Mousazadeh Milad, Kabdaşlı Işık, Khademi Sara, Sandoval Miguel Angel, Moussavi Seyedeh Parvin, Malekdar Fatemeh, Gilhotra Vishakha, Hashemi Marjan, Dehghani Mohammad Hadi
Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-Communicable Diseases, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Health, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
J Water Process Eng. 2022 Oct;49:103077. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.103077. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
The COVID-19 epidemic has put the risk of virus contamination in water bodies on the horizon of health authorities. Hence, finding effective ways to remove the virus, especially SARS-CoV-2, from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) has emerged as a hot issue in the last few years. Herein, this study first deals with the fate of SARS-CoV-2 genetic material in WWTPs, then critically reviews and compares different wastewater treatment methods for combatting COVID-19 as well as to increase the water quality. This critical review sheds light the efficiency of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) to inactivate virus, specially SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Although several physicochemical treatment processes (e.g. activated sludge) are commonly used to eliminate pathogens, AOPs are the most versatile and effective virus inactivation methods. For instance, TiO is the most known and widely studied photo-catalyst innocuously utilized to degrade pollutants as well as to photo-induce bacterial and virus disinfection due to its high chemical resistance and efficient photo-activity. When ozone is dissolved in water and wastewater, it generates a wide spectrum of the reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are responsible to degrade materials in virus membranes resulting in destroying the cell wall. Furthermore, electrochemical advanced oxidation processes act through direct oxidation when pathogens react at the anode surface or by indirect oxidation through oxidizing species produced in the bulk solution. Consequently, they represent a feasible choice for the inactivation of a wide range of pathogens. Nonetheless, there are some challenges with AOPs which should be addressed for application at industrial-scale.
新冠疫情使水体中病毒污染的风险进入了卫生当局的视野。因此,在过去几年中,找到从污水处理厂(WWTPs)中有效去除病毒,尤其是严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的方法已成为一个热门问题。在此,本研究首先探讨了SARS-CoV-2遗传物质在污水处理厂中的去向,然后批判性地回顾和比较了用于对抗新冠病毒以及提高水质的不同污水处理方法。这一批判性综述揭示了高级氧化工艺(AOPs)灭活病毒,特别是SARS-CoV-2 RNA的效率。尽管几种物理化学处理工艺(如活性污泥法)通常用于消除病原体,但高级氧化工艺是最通用且有效的病毒灭活方法。例如,二氧化钛(TiO)是最知名且研究广泛的光催化剂,由于其高化学抗性和高效的光活性,可无害地用于降解污染物以及光诱导细菌和病毒消毒。当臭氧溶解于水和废水中时,会产生多种活性氧物种(ROS),这些活性氧物种负责降解病毒膜中的物质,从而破坏细胞壁。此外,电化学高级氧化工艺通过病原体在阳极表面反应时的直接氧化或通过本体溶液中产生的氧化物种的间接氧化起作用。因此,它们是灭活多种病原体的可行选择。尽管如此,高级氧化工艺在工业规模应用中仍存在一些需要解决的挑战。