• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
In-Person or Online? The Effect of Delivery Mode on Team-Based Learning of Clinical Reasoning in a Family Medicine Clerkship.面授或在线?教学模式对家庭医学实习中基于团队的临床推理学习的影响。
Med Sci (Basel). 2022 Aug 8;10(3):41. doi: 10.3390/medsci10030041.
2
Modified Team-Based Learning in an Ophthalmology Clerkship in China.中国眼科学实习中的改良团队学习法。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0154250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154250. eCollection 2016.
3
Evaluation of the effectiveness of student learning and teacher instruction on team-based learning during quality control of diagnostic imaging.在诊断影像学质量控制中,基于团队学习的学生学习和教师教学效果评价。
Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1732159. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2020.1732159.
4
The effect of online and in-person team-based learning (TBL) on undergraduate endocrinology teaching during COVID-19 pandemic.在线和线下团队学习(TBL)对 COVID-19 大流行期间本科内分泌学教学的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Feb 22;22(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03173-5.
5
Application of Modified Team-Based Learning Approach for Enhancing Undergraduate Medical Educational Seminars.应用改良的基于团队的学习方法提升本科医学教育研讨会效果
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Jul 26;29(4):1163-1170. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00776-4. eCollection 2019 Dec.
6
The effectiveness of online team-based learning in introduction to medical ethics education for medical students at a medical college of Nepal: a pilot study.尼泊尔某医学院医学生医学伦理学导论在线团队学习的效果:一项试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Nov 8;22(1):766. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03813-w.
7
A meta-analysis of students' readiness assurance test performance with team-based learning.基于团队学习的学生准备度保证测试表现的荟萃分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jul 14;20(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02139-9.
8
Team-based learning replaces problem-based learning at a large medical school.以团队为基础的学习取代了一所大型医学院的以问题为基础的学习。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02362-4.
9
The effects of online Team-Based Learning on undergraduate nursing students' performance, attitudes and accountability during COVID-19 pandemic.在线团队学习对 COVID-19 大流行期间本科护理学生表现、态度和责任感的影响。
Acta Biomed. 2022 Dec 16;93(6):e2022346. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i6.13769.
10
Maternal-Fetal Physiology, Intrapartum Care, Postpartum Care: A Team-Based Learning Module for Normal Obstetrics.母胎生理学、分娩期护理、产后护理:正常产科学基于团队的学习模块
MedEdPORTAL. 2019 Nov 22;15:10856. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10856.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing clinical reasoning skills in medical students through team-based learning: a mixed-methods study.通过基于团队的学习提高医学生的临床推理能力:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 11;25(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06784-w.
2
A mixed methods, longitudinal study: characterizing the differences in engagement and perceived learning of medical students in online and in-person team-based learning classes.一项混合方法的纵向研究:刻画医学生在在线和面对面小组合作学习课程中的参与度和感知学习差异。
MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Feb 12;13:33. doi: 10.12688/mep.19535.2. eCollection 2023.
3
A comparative study on the effectiveness of online and in-class team-based learning on student performance and perceptions in virtual simulation experiments.在线与课堂团队学习在虚拟模拟实验中学生表现和认知效果的比较研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Feb 12;24(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05080-3.
4
Team-based learning (TBL) in clinical disciplines for undergraduate medical students-a scoping review.以团队为基础的学习(TBL)在临床医学本科生中的应用——范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jan 3;24(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04975-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Online Team-Based Learning Teaching Strategy for Developing Caring Competencies in Nursing Students under COVID-19 Pandemic Restrictions.新冠疫情限制下培养护生关怀能力的在线团队协作学习教学策略
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 5;9(11):1510. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9111510.
2
Online and In-class Team-Based Learning in Undergraduate Immunology: a Comparative Analysis.本科免疫学中基于团队的线上与线下学习:一项比较分析
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Sep 17;29(4):1193-1199. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00814-1. eCollection 2019 Dec.
3
Going virtual and going wide: comparing Team-Based Learning in-class online and across disciplines.走向虚拟与广泛应用:比较课堂内、在线及跨学科的基于团队的学习
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022;27(2):2311-2329. doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10683-0. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
4
A Randomized, Crossover Pilot Study of a Novel Web-Based/Mobile Platform for Collaborative Small Group Practice in Therapeutic Reasoning.一项关于新型基于网络/移动平台用于治疗推理协作小组实践的随机交叉试点研究。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020 Nov 26;7:2382120520977189. doi: 10.1177/2382120520977189. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
5
A meta-analysis of students' readiness assurance test performance with team-based learning.基于团队学习的学生准备度保证测试表现的荟萃分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jul 14;20(1):223. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02139-9.
6
Use of team-based learning pedagogy for predoctoral teaching and learning.基于团队的学习教学法在博士前教学中的应用。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2019 Feb;23(1):e32-e36. doi: 10.1111/eje.12396. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
7
Effectiveness of an interprofessional patient safety team-based learning simulation experience on healthcare professional trainees.基于跨专业医疗团队学习模拟体验对医疗专业实习生的效果。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Aug 8;18(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1301-4.
8
Pharmacy resident teaching and learning curriculum program outcomes: Student performance and quality assessment.药学住院医师教学课程计划成果:学生表现与质量评估。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Jun;10(6):680-686. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
9
Applying interprofessional Team-Based Learning in patient safety: a pilot evaluation study.跨专业团队学习在患者安全中的应用:一项试点评估研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1164-8.
10
Validity of Peer Evaluation for Team-Based Learning in a Dental School in Japan.日本一所牙科学校基于团队学习的同伴评价的有效性
J Dent Educ. 2017 Dec;81(12):1451-1456. doi: 10.21815/JDE.017.106.

面授或在线?教学模式对家庭医学实习中基于团队的临床推理学习的影响。

In-Person or Online? The Effect of Delivery Mode on Team-Based Learning of Clinical Reasoning in a Family Medicine Clerkship.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada.

出版信息

Med Sci (Basel). 2022 Aug 8;10(3):41. doi: 10.3390/medsci10030041.

DOI:10.3390/medsci10030041
PMID:35997333
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9397079/
Abstract

In health professions education, team-based learning (TBL) has been used to help learners develop clinical reasoning and decision-making skills. The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged institutions to move curriculum delivery from largely in-person to online. With the anticipated return to in-person instruction and arguments made in favor of online instruction in certain circumstances, evidence is needed to support decision making in curriculum planning. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of delivery mode (in-person vs. online) on student learning of clinical reasoning and clinical decision-making (CR/CDM) in the family medicine clerkship. Data from three cohorts of third-year medical students were included in the study: 2018/2019 cohort, in-person; 2019/2020 cohort, half of the cohort in-person, half of the cohort online; 2020/2021 cohort, online. Students' performance data-individual readiness assurance test (IRAT) and group readiness assurance test (GRAT) scores-were used. The Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) analysis was performed. As expected, students scored higher in GRAT than IRAT across the three cohorts. No significant IRAT-GRAT differences were observed between in-person and online delivery of TBL sessions. Student learning of CR/CDM in TBL is comparable between the two modes of delivery in the family medicine clerkship. Future research in other clerkships, years of medical education, and professional programs is needed to inform decision making regarding the TBL delivery mode.

摘要

在健康职业教育中,团队学习(TBL)已被用于帮助学习者发展临床推理和决策技能。COVID-19 大流行使各机构面临挑战,需要将课程教学从主要的面对面教学转变为在线教学。随着预计将恢复面对面教学,以及在某些情况下支持在线教学的论点,需要有证据来支持课程规划中的决策制定。本研究的目的是研究教学模式(面对面教学与在线教学)对家庭医学实习中临床推理和临床决策(CR/CDM)学生学习的影响。该研究纳入了三个三年级医学生队列的数据:2018/2019 队列,面对面教学;2019/2020 队列,一半的队列面对面教学,一半的队列在线教学;2020/2021 队列,在线教学。使用学生的表现数据——个人准备保证测试(IRAT)和小组准备保证测试(GRAT)分数——进行广义估计方程(GEE)分析。正如预期的那样,在三个队列中,学生在 GRAT 中的得分均高于 IRAT。在 TBL 课程的面对面和在线教学中,IRAT 和 GRAT 之间没有显著差异。在家庭医学实习中,TBL 中学生的 CR/CDM 学习在两种教学模式之间是可比的。需要在其他实习、医学教育年限和专业课程中进行进一步研究,为 TBL 教学模式的决策提供信息。