Barratt Ruth, Shaban Ramon Z, Gilbert Gwendolyn L
Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, 176 Hawkesbury Rd, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia; Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; The University of Sydney Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, NSW, Australia.
Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sydney. Camperdown. NSW, Australia; Directorate of Nursing, Midwifery and Clinical Governance, Western Sydney Local Health District, Westmead. NSW, Australia.
Infect Dis Health. 2020 Nov;25(4):253-261. doi: 10.1016/j.idh.2020.05.005. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
Using personal protective equipment (PPE) is one of several fundamental measures to prevent the transmission of infection and infectious diseases and is particularly pertinent in the current COVID-19 pandemic. Appropriate use of PPE by healthcare workers is, however, often suboptimal. Training and monitoring of PPE competency are essential components of an infection prevention and control program but there is a paucity of research and data on the content of such training programs across Australasia. This paper reports the results of a survey that characterised the nature of PPE training in Australian and New Zealand hospitals.
A population-based online survey was distributed to members of three major Australasian colleges representing infection prevention and control.
Results indicate that, although training is frequently provided at orientation, many healthcare workers do not receive regular updates. Training programmes combine online and classroom sessions, but over a third do not include a practical component. The frequency of monitoring PPE competency is variable with one third of respondents indicating that no auditing occurs. PPE items used for high-level training are variable, with use of powered air purifying respirators (PAPRs) uncommon.
The results of this study suggest that HCWs' confidence, competence and familiarity with PPE are a concern, which in the context of the current global COVID-19 pandemic is problematic. More research is needed into how PPE training programs could be better designed, to prepare HCWs for practice using PPE safely and confidently.
使用个人防护装备(PPE)是预防感染和传染病传播的几项基本措施之一,在当前的 COVID-19 大流行中尤为重要。然而,医护人员对 PPE 的正确使用往往并不理想。对 PPE 能力的培训和监测是感染预防与控制计划的重要组成部分,但在澳大拉西亚地区,关于此类培训计划内容的研究和数据却很匮乏。本文报告了一项调查结果,该调查对澳大利亚和新西兰医院中 PPE 培训的性质进行了描述。
向代表感染预防与控制领域的澳大拉西亚三所主要学院的成员开展了一项基于人群的在线调查。
结果表明,尽管在入职培训时经常会提供培训,但许多医护人员并未得到定期更新。培训计划结合了在线课程和课堂教学,但超过三分之一的培训计划不包括实践部分。对 PPE 能力的监测频率各不相同,三分之一的受访者表示没有进行审核。用于高级培训的 PPE 项目各不相同,动力空气净化呼吸器(PAPR)的使用并不常见。
本研究结果表明,医护人员对 PPE 的信心、能力和熟悉程度令人担忧,在当前全球 COVID-19 大流行的背景下,这是个问题。需要更多研究来探讨如何更好地设计 PPE 培训计划,以使医护人员能够安全、自信地使用 PPE 进行实践。