Center for Children and Families, Department of Psychology, Florida International University.
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2022 Sep-Oct;51(5):593-609. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2022.2109649. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
Treatment protocols for youth-internalizing disorders have been developed, however these protocols have yielded mixed findings in routine care settings. Despite increased recognition of the importance of flexibility when delivering evidence-based treatments (EBTs), little is known about the extent to which protocols offer guidance to providers in flexible EBT implementation. The current study examined the extent to which supported EBTs for youth internalizing disorders explicitly incorporate guidance for treatment modification.
Supported treatment protocols for youth internalizing disorders were identified (N = 44), from which 4,021 modification guidelines were extracted and coded using a structured coding system to classify modification strategies (i.e., the forms that recommended modifications take), and associated tailoring factors (i.e., the rationale for which modifications are recommended).
Across all EBTs, modification guidelines were quite common, with the average protocol including almost 91 text passages providing guidance for modification. The majority of modification guidelines functionally session or treatment length by recommending the addition or repetition of material, whereas less than 5% of modification guidelines provided strategies for condensing or streamlining care. Strikingly, less than 2% of modification guidelines in EBT protocols address patient cultural factors, and rarely address provider or setting issues that can challenge standard implementation.
Findings highlight critical gaps in the available guidance to modify EBTs for youth internalizing disorders, and suggest EBT protocols may not be optimally poised to flexibly address the broad diversity of children and adolescents across varied settings in need of mental health care.
针对青少年内化障碍的治疗方案已经制定,然而这些方案在常规护理环境中的效果参差不齐。尽管在提供基于证据的治疗(EBT)时,人们越来越认识到灵活性的重要性,但对于方案在灵活实施 EBT 方面提供指导的程度知之甚少。本研究考察了支持青少年内化障碍的 EBT 在多大程度上明确纳入了治疗修改的指导。
确定了支持青少年内化障碍的治疗方案(N=44),从中提取了 4021 条修改指南,并使用结构化编码系统对其进行编码,以对修改策略(即推荐修改的形式)和相关调整因素(即推荐修改的理由)进行分类。
在所有 EBT 中,修改指南非常常见,平均每个方案包括近 91 个提供修改指导的文本段落。大多数修改指南通过建议添加或重复材料来功能性地调整治疗时长,而不到 5%的修改指南提供了简化或精简护理的策略。引人注目的是,不到 2%的 EBT 方案中的修改指南涉及患者的文化因素,很少涉及可能对标准实施构成挑战的提供者或环境问题。
研究结果突出了修改青少年内化障碍 EBT 时现有指导的关键差距,并表明 EBT 方案可能无法灵活地应对需要心理健康护理的各种不同环境中广泛的儿童和青少年的多样化需求。