Pérez Vilma, Liu Yichen, Hengst Martha B, Weyrich Laura S
Australian Centre for Ancient DNA (ACAD), School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage (CABAH), School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Microorganisms. 2022 Aug 10;10(8):1623. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10081623.
High Throughput DNA Sequencing (HTS) revolutionized the field of paleomicrobiology, leading to an explosive growth of microbial ancient DNA (aDNA) studies, especially from environmental samples. However, aDNA studies that examine environmental microbes routinely fail to authenticate aDNA, examine laboratory and environmental contamination, and control for biases introduced during sample processing. Here, we surveyed the available literature for environmental aDNA projects—from sample collection to data analysis—and assessed previous methodologies and approaches used in the published microbial aDNA studies. We then integrated these concepts into a case study, using shotgun metagenomics to examine methodological, technical, and analytical biases during an environmental aDNA study of soil microbes. Specifically, we compared the impact of five DNA extraction methods and eight bioinformatic pipelines on the recovery of microbial aDNA information in soil cores from extreme environments. Our results show that silica-based methods optimized for aDNA research recovered significantly more damaged and shorter reads (<100 bp) than a commercial kit or a phenol−chloroform method. Additionally, we described a stringent pipeline for data preprocessing, efficiently decreasing the representation of low-complexity and duplicated reads in our datasets and downstream analyses, reducing analytical biases in taxonomic classification.
高通量DNA测序(HTS)彻底改变了古微生物学领域,导致微生物古代DNA(aDNA)研究呈爆发式增长,尤其是对环境样本的研究。然而,常规检测环境微生物的aDNA研究往往未能对aDNA进行鉴定,未检测实验室和环境污染情况,也未控制样本处理过程中引入的偏差。在此,我们查阅了有关环境aDNA项目的现有文献——从样本采集到数据分析——并评估了已发表的微生物aDNA研究中使用的先前方法和途径。然后,我们将这些概念整合到一个案例研究中,使用鸟枪法宏基因组学来研究土壤微生物环境aDNA研究过程中的方法学、技术和分析偏差。具体而言,我们比较了五种DNA提取方法和八种生物信息学流程对极端环境土壤核心中微生物aDNA信息恢复的影响。我们的结果表明,针对aDNA研究优化的基于硅胶的方法比商业试剂盒或酚-氯仿法能显著回收更多受损且较短的 reads(<100 bp)。此外,我们描述了一种严格的数据预处理流程,有效减少了数据集中低复杂性和重复 reads 在下游分析中的占比,降低了分类学分类中的分析偏差。