• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外培养离体根中早期盐胁迫响应蛋白的鉴定

Identification of Early Salt-Stress-Responsive Proteins in In Vitro Cultured Excised Roots.

作者信息

Sevilla Emma, Andreu Pilar, Fillat María F, Peleato M Luisa, Marín Juan A, Arbeloa Arancha

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Institute of Biocomputation, Physics of Complex Systems, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.

Pomology Department, Estación Experimental de Aula Dei CSIC, Av. Montañana 1005, 50059 Zaragoza, Spain.

出版信息

Plants (Basel). 2022 Aug 12;11(16):2101. doi: 10.3390/plants11162101.

DOI:10.3390/plants11162101
PMID:36015404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9416420/
Abstract

Fruit-tree rootstock selection is a challenge under a scenario of growing environmental stresses in which the soil and climate are greatly affected. Salinization is an increasing global process that severely affects soil fertility. The selection of rootstocks with the ability to tolerate salt stress is essential. Excised root cultures may be an excellent experimental approach to study stress physiology and a predictive tool to assess possible tolerance. In this study, we show how protein changes in response to salt stress evaluated in excised root cultures of (moderate salt-sensitive cultivar) could be representative of these changes in the roots of whole plants. The 2D electrophoresis of root extracts and subsequent spot identification by MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS show 16 relevant proteins differentially expressed in roots as a response to 60 mM NaCl. Cytoplasmic isozyme fructose 1,6-bisphosphate aldolase shows relevant changes in its relative presence of isoforms as a response to saline stress, while the total level of enzymes remains similar. Ferredoxin-NADP reductase increases as a response to salinity, even though the measured activity is not significantly different. The observed changes are congruent with previous proteomic studies on the roots of whole plants that are involved in protection mechanisms against salt stress.

摘要

在土壤和气候受到极大影响的环境压力不断增加的情况下,果树砧木的选择是一项挑战。盐渍化是一个日益全球化的过程,严重影响土壤肥力。选择具有耐盐胁迫能力的砧木至关重要。离体根培养可能是研究胁迫生理学的一种优秀实验方法,也是评估可能耐受性的一种预测工具。在本研究中,我们展示了在(中度盐敏感品种)的离体根培养中评估的响应盐胁迫的蛋白质变化如何能够代表整株植物根系中的这些变化。根提取物的二维电泳以及随后通过MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS进行的斑点鉴定显示,有16种相关蛋白质在根系中因60 mM NaCl而差异表达。细胞质同工酶果糖1,6-二磷酸醛缩酶在其同工型的相对存在方面表现出与盐胁迫相关的变化,而酶的总水平保持相似。铁氧还蛋白-NADP还原酶对盐度增加有响应,尽管测得的活性没有显著差异。观察到的变化与先前关于参与盐胁迫保护机制的整株植物根系的蛋白质组学研究一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5209/9416420/2c75ffab9eac/plants-11-02101-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5209/9416420/bed0f97dcd37/plants-11-02101-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5209/9416420/426987c99a7b/plants-11-02101-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5209/9416420/b86c7db288cb/plants-11-02101-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5209/9416420/2c75ffab9eac/plants-11-02101-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5209/9416420/bed0f97dcd37/plants-11-02101-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5209/9416420/426987c99a7b/plants-11-02101-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5209/9416420/b86c7db288cb/plants-11-02101-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5209/9416420/2c75ffab9eac/plants-11-02101-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Identification of Early Salt-Stress-Responsive Proteins in In Vitro Cultured Excised Roots.体外培养离体根中早期盐胁迫响应蛋白的鉴定
Plants (Basel). 2022 Aug 12;11(16):2101. doi: 10.3390/plants11162101.
2
Comparative proteomic analysis of salt-responsive proteins in canola roots by 2-DE and MALDI-TOF MS.利用 2-DE 和 MALDI-TOF MS 技术对油菜根中盐响应蛋白进行比较蛋白质组学分析。
Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom. 2019 Mar;1867(3):227-236. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2018.12.009. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
3
Distinct salinity-induced changes in wheat metabolic machinery in different root tissue types.不同根系组织类型中,盐分诱导小麦代谢机制发生的明显变化。
J Proteomics. 2022 Mar 30;256:104502. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2022.104502. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
4
Proteomic analysis of early salt stress responsive proteins in alfalfa roots and shoots.苜蓿根和茎中早期盐胁迫响应蛋白的蛋白质组学分析
Proteome Sci. 2017 Oct 30;15:19. doi: 10.1186/s12953-017-0127-z. eCollection 2017.
5
Protein profile analysis of salt-responsive proteins in leaves and roots in two cultivars of creeping bentgrass differing in salinity tolerance.两种耐盐性不同的匍匐翦股颖品种叶片和根系盐响应蛋白的蛋白质谱分析。
Plant Cell Rep. 2010 Jun;29(6):595-615. doi: 10.1007/s00299-010-0847-3. Epub 2010 Apr 2.
6
Comparative proteomic analysis of early salt stress-responsive proteins in roots of SnRK2 transgenic rice.盐胁迫响应蛋白的比较蛋白质组学分析在 SnRK2 转基因水稻根系中的早期表现。
Proteome Sci. 2012 Mar 31;10:25. doi: 10.1186/1477-5956-10-25.
7
Comparative 2D-DIGE analysis of salinity responsive microsomal proteins from leaves of salt-sensitive Arabidopsis thaliana and salt-tolerant Thellungiella salsuginea.盐敏感型拟南芥和耐盐型盐芥叶片中盐响应微粒体蛋白的二维差异凝胶电泳比较分析
J Proteomics. 2014 Dec 5;111:113-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.05.018. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
8
Investigation of Salt Tolerance Mechanisms Across a Root Developmental Gradient in Almond Rootstocks.杏仁砧木根系发育梯度上耐盐机制的研究
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jan 5;11:595055. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.595055. eCollection 2020.
9
Growth patterns and morphology of fine roots of size-controlling and invigorating peach rootstocks.调控与壮根型桃砧木细根的生长模式与形态
Tree Physiol. 2007 Feb;27(2):231-41. doi: 10.1093/treephys/27.2.231.
10
Identification of early salt stress responsive proteins in seedling roots of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) employing iTRAQ-based proteomic technique.利用基于iTRAQ的蛋白质组学技术鉴定陆地棉(Gossypium hirsutum L.)幼苗根系中早期盐胁迫响应蛋白
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Sep 11;6:732. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00732. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
Salinity responses and tolerance mechanisms in underground vegetable crops: an integrative review.地下蔬菜作物的盐度响应与耐受机制:综合评述。
Planta. 2022 Feb 15;255(3):68. doi: 10.1007/s00425-022-03845-y.
2
Morphological, physiological, biochemical, and transcriptome studies reveal the importance of transporters and stress signaling pathways during salinity stress in Prunus.形态学、生理学、生物化学和转录组学研究揭示了在盐分胁迫下,转运蛋白和应激信号通路在李属植物中的重要性。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 24;12(1):1274. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05202-1.
3
Root vacuolar sequestration and suberization are prominent responses of spp. rootstocks during salinity stress.
根液泡隔离和栓质化是[植物品种]砧木在盐分胁迫期间的显著反应。 (注:原文中“ spp.”表述有误,推测可能是某种植物品种的缩写,这里按常规翻译处理,实际应用中需根据准确信息完善)
Plant Direct. 2021 May 19;5(5):e00315. doi: 10.1002/pld3.315. eCollection 2021 May.
4
Prunus Hexokinase 3 genes alter primary C-metabolism and promote drought and salt stress tolerance in Arabidopsis transgenic plants.李属己糖激酶 3 基因改变原初 C 代谢并促进拟南芥转基因植物对干旱和盐胁迫的耐受性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 29;11(1):7098. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86535-1.
5
Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Two Species Leaves Under NaCl Stress.NaCl胁迫下两个物种叶片的比较蛋白质组学分析
Iran J Biotechnol. 2019 Sep 1;17(3):e2219. doi: 10.29252/ijb.2219. eCollection 2019 Sep.
6
Discovery of a Redox Thiol Switch: Implications for Cellular Energy Metabolism.氧化还原硫醇开关的发现:对细胞能量代谢的影响。
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2020 May;19(5):852-870. doi: 10.1074/mcp.RA119.001910. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
7
Root Proteomic Analysis of Two Grapevine Rootstock Genotypes Showing Different Susceptibility to Salt Stress.两种葡萄砧木基因型根系蛋白质组分析对盐胁迫的不同敏感性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 6;21(3):1076. doi: 10.3390/ijms21031076.
8
Protein and Proteome Atlas for Plants under Stresses: New Highlights and Ways for Integrated Omics in Post-Genomics Era.应激条件下植物的蛋白质组学和蛋白质图谱:后基因组时代整合组学的新亮点和途径。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Oct 21;20(20):5222. doi: 10.3390/ijms20205222.
9
Developmental Responses to Water and Salinity in Root Systems.根系对水和盐度的发育响应。
Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2019 Oct 6;35:239-257. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100617-062949. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
10
Selection of reliable reference genes for quantitative RT-PCR in garlic under salt stress.盐胁迫下大蒜定量逆转录聚合酶链反应可靠内参基因的筛选
PeerJ. 2019 Jul 16;7:e7319. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7319. eCollection 2019.