• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

婴儿喂养政策和监测系统:对欧洲国家的定性研究。

Infant feeding policies and monitoring systems: A qualitative study of European Countries.

机构信息

Lactation Consultants of Great Britain, Bath, United Kingdom.

University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.

出版信息

Matern Child Nutr. 2022 Oct;18(4):e13425. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13425. Epub 2022 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1111/mcn.13425
PMID:36017759
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9480958/
Abstract

Implementation of the Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding varies widely among countries. Policymakers would benefit from insights into obstacles and enablers. Our aim was to explore the processes behind the development and implementation of national infant and young child feeding policies and monitoring systems in Europe. A qualitative study design was employed to analyze open text responses from six European countries (Croatia, Germany, Lithuania, Spain, Turkey and Ukraine) using inductive thematic analysis. Countries were selected based on their World Breastfeeding Trends Initiative scores on national policy and monitoring systems. The 33-item online questionnaire was distributed to country representatives and completed by country teams. Key enablers and strengths included strong and continuous government commitment to infant and young child feeding, an operational national breastfeeding authority, a national and active monitoring and evaluation system, implementation of the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes in national legislation, the integration of skilled breastfeeding supporters, the implementation of the Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative, and positive cultural norms and traditions supporting optimal infant and young child feeding. In some countries, UNICEF played a key role in funding and designing policies and monitoring systems. Weak government leadership, the strong influence of the industry, lack of adequate national legislation on the International Code and cultural norms which devalued breastfeeding were particularly noted as obstacles. Government commitment, funding and protection of optimal infant and young child feeding are essential to the implementation of strong national policies and monitoring systems.

摘要

全球婴幼儿喂养战略的实施在各国之间存在很大差异。政策制定者需要深入了解障碍和促进因素。我们的目的是探讨欧洲国家婴幼儿喂养政策和监测系统制定和实施背后的过程。采用定性研究设计,使用归纳主题分析方法对来自六个欧洲国家(克罗地亚、德国、立陶宛、西班牙、土耳其和乌克兰)的 33 项在线问卷的开放文本回复进行分析。这些国家是根据其在国家政策和监测系统方面的世界母乳喂养趋势倡议得分选择的。该 33 项在线问卷分发给国家代表,并由国家团队完成。主要的促进因素和优势包括政府对婴幼儿喂养的持续坚定承诺、运作中的国家母乳喂养管理机构、国家和积极的监测和评估系统、国家立法中实施《国际母乳代用品销售守则》、熟练的母乳喂养支持者的融入、实施爱婴医院倡议,以及支持婴幼儿最佳喂养的积极文化规范和传统。在一些国家,儿基会在为政策和监测系统提供资金和设计方面发挥了关键作用。政府领导力薄弱、行业影响力大、缺乏关于《国际母乳代用品销售守则》的充分国家立法以及轻视母乳喂养的文化规范被特别视为障碍。政府对婴幼儿最佳喂养的承诺、资金支持和保护对于实施强有力的国家政策和监测系统至关重要。

相似文献

1
Infant feeding policies and monitoring systems: A qualitative study of European Countries.婴儿喂养政策和监测系统:对欧洲国家的定性研究。
Matern Child Nutr. 2022 Oct;18(4):e13425. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13425. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
2
Are our babies off to a healthy start? The state of implementation of the Global strategy for infant and young child feeding in Europe.我们的宝宝是否有一个健康的开端?欧洲实施全球婴幼儿喂养策略的状况。
Int Breastfeed J. 2020 Jun 4;15(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13006-020-00282-z.
3
Legislation, policies and guidelines related to breastfeeding and the Baby Friendly Health Initiative in Australia: a document analysis.澳大利亚与母乳喂养及爱婴医院倡议相关的立法、政策和指南:文献分析
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Feb;42(1):72-81. doi: 10.1071/AH16067.
4
Changes in the policy environment for infant and young child feeding in Vietnam, Bangladesh, and Ethiopia, and the role of targeted advocacy.越南、孟加拉国和埃塞俄比亚婴幼儿喂养政策环境的变化以及针对性宣传的作用。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 13;17(Suppl 2):492. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4343-3.
5
Breastfeeding practices and policies in WHO European Region Member States.世界卫生组织欧洲区域成员国的母乳喂养实践与政策。
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Mar;19(4):753-64. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015001767. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
6
Protecting breastfeeding in West and Central Africa: over 25 years of implementation of the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes.保护西非和中非地区的母乳喂养:《国际母乳代用品销售守则》实施25年以上
Food Nutr Bull. 2008 Sep;29(3):159-62. doi: 10.1177/156482650802900301.
7
Enforcing the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes for Better Promotion of Exclusive Breastfeeding: Can Lessons Be Learned?执行《国际母乳代用品销售守则》以更好地促进纯母乳喂养:能吸取哪些经验教训?
J Hum Lact. 2016 Feb;32(1):20-7. doi: 10.1177/0890334415607816. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
8
Baby-Friendly Community Initiative-From national guidelines to implementation: A multisectoral platform for improving infant and young child feeding practices and integrated health services.爱婴社区行动倡议——从国家指南到实施:改善婴幼儿喂养实践和综合卫生服务的多部门平台。
Matern Child Nutr. 2019 Jan;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e12747. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12747.
9
Breastfeeding, first-food systems and corporate power: a case study on the market and political practices of the transnational baby food industry and public health resistance in the Philippines.母乳喂养、初食系统与企业权力:以跨国婴儿食品行业的市场和政治实践与菲律宾的公共卫生抵制为例
Global Health. 2021 Oct 26;17(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00774-5.
10
How Does the United States Rank According to the World Breastfeeding Trends Initiative?根据世界母乳喂养趋势倡议组织的数据,美国的排名如何?
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2018 Apr/Jun;32(2):127-135. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0000000000000318.

引用本文的文献

1
[Poorer countries have more pro-breastfeeding actions than rich countries: ecological study of 98 countries].[较贫穷国家比富裕国家有更多支持母乳喂养的行动:对98个国家的生态学研究]
Cad Saude Publica. 2024 Nov 25;40(10):e00007024. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XPT007024. eCollection 2024.
2
Perceived influence of commercial milk formula labelling on mothers' feeding choices in Great Britain: a qualitative study.英国一项定性研究显示,商业配方奶粉标签对母亲喂养选择的感知影响。
Arch Dis Child. 2023 Dec;108(12):1008-1013. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325767. Epub 2023 Aug 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing the Becoming Breastfeeding Friendly initiative in Scotland.在苏格兰实施成为母乳喂养友好倡议。
Matern Child Nutr. 2023 Jan;19 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e13304. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13304. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
2
Globalization, first-foods systems transformations and corporate power: a synthesis of literature and data on the market and political practices of the transnational baby food industry.全球化、第一食品体系转型和企业权力:跨国婴儿食品行业市场和政治实践的文献和数据综述。
Global Health. 2021 May 21;17(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00708-1.
3
Effect of cesarean section on initiation of breast feeding: Findings from 2016 Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey.剖宫产对母乳喂养启动的影响:来自 2016 年埃塞俄比亚人口与健康调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 18;15(12):e0244229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244229. eCollection 2020.
4
Principles of Clinical Ethics and Their Application to Practice.临床伦理学原则及其在实践中的应用。
Med Princ Pract. 2021;30(1):17-28. doi: 10.1159/000509119. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
5
Are our babies off to a healthy start? The state of implementation of the Global strategy for infant and young child feeding in Europe.我们的宝宝是否有一个健康的开端?欧洲实施全球婴幼儿喂养策略的状况。
Int Breastfeed J. 2020 Jun 4;15(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13006-020-00282-z.
6
Sponsorship of national and regional professional paediatrics associations by companies that make breast-milk substitutes: evidence from a review of official websites.企业对国家和地区专业儿科协会的赞助:对官方网站审查结果的证据。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 10;9(8):e029035. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029035.
7
Conducting Online Surveys.在线调查。
J Hum Lact. 2019 Aug;35(3):413-417. doi: 10.1177/0890334419848734. Epub 2019 May 14.
8
The World Breastfeeding Trends Initiative: Implementation of the Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding in 84 countries.世界母乳喂养趋势倡议:84 个国家实施婴幼儿喂养全球战略。
J Public Health Policy. 2019 Mar;40(1):35-65. doi: 10.1057/s41271-018-0153-9.
9
Becoming Breastfeeding Friendly Index: Development and application for scaling-up breastfeeding programmes globally.成为母乳喂养友好指数:在全球范围内扩大母乳喂养计划的发展和应用。
Matern Child Nutr. 2018 Jul;14(3):e12596. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12596. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
10
Who Do We Think We Are? Disrupting Notions of Quality in Qualitative Research.我们以为自己是谁?颠覆定性研究中质量的观念。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Mar;28(4):673-680. doi: 10.1177/1049732317748896. Epub 2017 Dec 31.