State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resources Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200092, China; Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security, Shanghai 200092, China.
Southern Laboratory of Ocean Science and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Water Cycle and Water Security in Southern China of Guangdong Higher Education Institute, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510275, China.
Water Res. 2022 Sep 1;223:118987. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118987. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
In China, urea degradants are often used in combination with chlorine in swimming pool water to remove urea. Here we report the first study about the impacts of urea degradants on urea degradation, disinfection byproduct (DBP) formation and estimated DBP-associated cytotoxicity and genotoxicity. Firstly, four groups of typical DBPs from six real indoor swimming pools were analyzed. The concentration of DBPs in swimming pool waters was about 1-2 orders of magnitude higher than that source tap water. Notably, a rapid increase in DBPs was observed after urea degradant treatment. Simulated processes of urea removal using three commonly used urea degradants were therefore conducted in laboratory. Neither urea degradant nor chlorine alone removed urea effectively within 48 h. When applied in combination, urea degradant with sufficient chlorine rapidly removed urea by 100% within 3 h, and anti-chlorourea oligomer in urea degradants was the main contributor. Meanwhile, a remarkable increase in DBPs, especially brominated DBPs, was observed due to bromide introduction by urea degradants. For this reason, bromine incorporation factor (BIF) of DBPs dramatically increased. For instance, the BIF of dihaloacetic acids increased by 2665%-4025% after applying three urea degradants. As the highly toxic brominated DBPs were generated, attention should be paid into the potential DBP-related health risks from the use of urea degradants together with chlorine.
在中国,尿素降解剂常与泳池水中的氯联合使用以去除尿素。本研究首次报道了尿素降解剂对尿素降解、消毒副产物(DBP)形成以及潜在的 DBP 相关细胞毒性和遗传毒性的影响。首先,分析了来自六个实际室内游泳池的六组典型 DBP。泳池水中 DBP 的浓度比水源自来水高 1-2 个数量级。值得注意的是,在使用尿素降解剂处理后,DBP 的浓度迅速增加。因此,在实验室中模拟了三种常用的尿素降解剂去除尿素的过程。单独使用尿素降解剂或氯都不能在 48 小时内有效地去除尿素。当联合使用时,尿素降解剂与足够的氯在 3 小时内迅速将尿素去除 100%,并且尿素降解剂中的抗氯脲寡聚物是主要贡献者。同时,由于尿素降解剂引入了溴化物,DBP(特别是溴代 DBP)的含量显著增加。因此,DBP 的溴化系数(BIF)显著增加。例如,在使用三种尿素降解剂后,二卤乙酸的 BIF 增加了 2665%-4025%。由于生成了高毒性的溴代 DBP,因此应注意使用尿素降解剂与氯联合使用可能带来的与 DBP 相关的健康风险。