Effect of Sodium Hypochlorite in Dental Unit Waterline on Aerosolized Bacteria Generated from Endodontic Procedures.

INTRODUCTION

Aerosol generation in a dental setting is a critical concern, and approaches that aim at decreasing bacterial load in aerosols are of high priority for dental professionals. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the relative effect of various endodontic procedures on the generation and dissemination of aerosols and the effect of 0.1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) in dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) on the bacterial load in the generated aerosols in a clinical setting.

METHODS

The study was completed in 2 phases. The classic passive sampling technique using brain-heart infusion agar plates was used. Agar plates were strategically placed throughout the operatory at predefined locations. In phase 1, to evaluate the effect of different endodontic procedures on the generation and dissemination of aerosols, we collected a total of 38 samples. After baseline collection, test samples were collected during vital pulp therapy (VPT) full pulpotomy (n = 10), nonsurgical root canal therapy (NSRCT, n = 10), surgical root canal therapy (SRCT, n = 10), and incision and drainage (n = 8) procedures. Bacterial growth was expressed as colony-forming units at 48 hours after sample collection. Data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance with the Tukey multiple comparison post hoc test. In phase 2, to evaluate the effect of 0.1% NaOCl in the DUWL on the bacterial load in the generated aerosols, a total of 30 samples were collected. All procedures including VPT (n = 10), NSRCT (n = 10), and SRCT (n = 10) were performed with 0.1% NaOCl in the DUWL. Bacterial growth was expressed as colony-forming units at 48 hours after sample collection. Data were analyzed using 2-way analysis of variance with the Tukey multiple comparison post hoc test.

RESULTS

All endodontic procedures generated aerosols at all tested locations, except incision and drainage. Aerosols were disseminated as far as 3 m from the patient's head with no significant difference between various locations (P > .05). VPT procedures generated the maximum number of aerosols compared with NSRCT and SRCT. Adding 0.1% NaOCl to DUWLs significantly reduced the bacterial load in the generated aerosols in all treatment groups compared with groups treated with untreated waterlines (P < .05). No significant difference was noted in the bacterial load between all groups with treated waterlines (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

All tested endodontic procedures led to the generation and dissemination of contaminated aerosols, and the addition of 0.1% NaOCl as a biocide to the DUWL led to a statistically significant reduction in the bacterial load.