Karpodini Claire Chrysanthi, Dinas Petros C, Angelopoulou Efthalia, Wyon Matthew A, Haas Aline Nogueira, Bougiesi Maria, Papageorgiou Sokratis G, Koutedakis Yiannis
Sport and Physical Activity Research Centre, Faculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom.
Functional Architecture of Mammals in their Environment Laboratory, Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece.
Front Neurol. 2022 Aug 9;13:875178. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.875178. eCollection 2022.
The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize evidence associated with the functional and clinical effectiveness of rhythmic cueing, dance, or resistance training (RT) on motor and non-motor parameters in Parkinson's Disease patients, and to provide a comparative perspective not offered by existing systematic reviews.
Eligibility criteria for selecting studies retained no restrictions in methodological design and included interventions of rhythmic cueing, dance, RT, and measurements of motor and non-motor parameters. Animal studies, reviews, editorials, conferences, magazines, and gray literature articles were excluded. Two independent investigators searched Cochrane Library, Medline, PubMed, and SPORTDiscus from the date of their inception until 1 June 2021. The ROBINS-I tool was employed for the non-randomized controlled trials, and the updated for Risk of Bias 2 tool of Cochrane Library used for randomized controlled trials. For meta-analyses, the RevMan 5.4.13 software was used. For incompatible meta-analysis studies, a narrative data synthesis was conducted.
A total of 49 studies included in the systematic review involving 3767 PD participants. Meta-analyses revealed that rhythmic cueing training assists gait velocity ( = 0.01), stride length ( = 0.01), and motor symptoms ( = 0.03). Similarly, dance training benefits stride length ( = 0.05), lower extremity function-TUG ( = 0.01), and motor symptoms ( = 0.01), whilst RT improves lower extremity function-TUG ( = 0.01), quality of life ( = 0.01), knee flexion ( = 0.02), and leg press ( = 0.01). Subgroup analyses have shown non-significant differences in gait velocity ( = 0.26), stride length ( = 0.80), functional mobility-TUG ( = 0.74), motor symptoms-UPDRS-III ( = 0.46), and quality of life-PDQ39 ( = 0.44).
Rhythmic cueing, dance, or RT positively affect the examined outcomes, with rhythmic cueing to be associated with three outcomes (Gait, Stride, and UPDRS-III), dance with three outcomes (TUG, Stride, and UPDRS-III), and RT with two outcomes (TUG and PDQ-39). Subgroup analyses confirmed the beneficial effects of these forms of exercise. Clinicians should entertain the idea of more holistic exercise protocols aiming at improving PD manifestations.International Prospective Register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) (registration number: CRD42020212380).
本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是综合与帕金森病患者运动和非运动参数的节奏提示、舞蹈或阻力训练(RT)的功能和临床效果相关的证据,并提供现有系统评价未提供的比较视角。
选择研究的纳入标准在方法设计上没有限制,包括节奏提示、舞蹈、RT干预以及运动和非运动参数的测量。动物研究、综述、社论、会议、杂志和灰色文献文章被排除。两名独立研究人员从Cochrane图书馆、Medline、PubMed和SPORTDiscus创建之日起至2021年6月1日进行检索。ROBINS-I工具用于非随机对照试验,Cochrane图书馆更新的偏倚风险2工具用于随机对照试验。对于荟萃分析,使用RevMan 5.4.13软件。对于不兼容的荟萃分析研究,进行叙述性数据综合。
系统评价共纳入49项研究,涉及3767名帕金森病参与者。荟萃分析显示,节奏提示训练有助于提高步速( = 0.01)、步幅( = 0.01)和运动症状( = 0.03)。同样,舞蹈训练有益于步幅( = 0.05)、下肢功能-定时起立行走测试(TUG)( = 0.01)和运动症状( = 0.01),而RT可改善下肢功能-TUG( = 0.01)、生活质量( = 0.01)、膝关节屈曲( = 0.02)和腿部推举( = 0.01)。亚组分析显示,步速( = 0.26)、步幅( = 0.80)、功能活动能力-TUG( = 0.74)、运动症状-统一帕金森病评定量表第三部分(UPDRS-III)( = 0.46)和生活质量-PDQ39( = 0.44)方面无显著差异。
节奏提示、舞蹈或RT对所检查的结果有积极影响,节奏提示与三个结果相关(步态、步幅和UPDRS-III),舞蹈与三个结果相关(TUG、步幅和UPDRS-III),RT与两个结果相关(TUG和PDQ-39)。亚组分析证实了这些运动形式的有益效果。临床医生应考虑采用更全面的运动方案来改善帕金森病的表现。国际系统评价前瞻性注册库(PROSPERO)(注册号:CRD42020212380)。