Suppr超能文献

用于评估运动员水合状态的尿液颜色L*a*b*值验证

Validation of urine colour L*a*b* for assessing hydration amongst athletes.

作者信息

Feng Yiwei, Fang Guoliang, Qu Chaoyi, Cui Shuqiang, Geng Xue, Gao Derun, Qin Fei, Zhao Jiexiu

机构信息

Exercise Biological Center, China Institute of Sport Science, Beijing, China.

Department of Exercise Physiology, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Nutr. 2022 Aug 10;9:997189. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.997189. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Existing studies have confirmed that urine colour through a urine colour chart is one of the effective indicators for assessing hydration. In recent years, the Lab* colour space has been widely used in the objective quantitative analysis of colour. The L*, a* and b* values represent the luminance change from black to white, the chromaticity change from green to red and the chromaticity change from blue to yellow, respectively. This study aimed to examine the validity of the urine colour Lab* parameters for assessing the level of hydration amongst athletes.

METHODS

The study included a total of 474 young elite athletes (251 males and 223 females, age: 24.59 ± 4.86 years). A total of 803 urine samples were collected from the subjects in various stages of hydration, including morning urine and spot urine sample during rehydration. Lab* parameters were measured by spectrophotometer. Hydration status was assessed via urine osmolality and urine specific gravity.

RESULTS

Urine colour b* value has a high correlation with urine specific gravity and urine osmolality (r = 0.811, 0.741, both < 0.01); L* value has a moderate correlation with urine specific gravity and urine osmolality (r = -0.508, -0.471, both < 0.01); there was no significant correlation between a* value and urine specific gravity, urine osmolality ( > 0.05). Whether the diagnosis of hypohydration is based on Usg ≥ 1.020 or Uosm ≥ 700 mmol/kg: The AUC of b* values were all above 0.9 and the specificity and sensitivity of b* values were high (both greater than 80%). The AUC of both L* and a* values were less than 0.5. Whether the diagnosis of hyperhydration is based on Usg ≤ 1.010 or Uosm ≤ 500 mmol/kg: The AUC of b* values were all above 0.9 and the specificity and sensitivity of b* value were high (both greater than 90%). The AUC of both L* and a* values were less than 0.5.

CONCLUSION

These results suggested that the validity of urine colour b* value for assessing hydration amongst athletes was high, however, the validity of urine colour L* and a* values were low.

摘要

目的

现有研究已证实,通过尿色图表判断尿液颜色是评估水合状态的有效指标之一。近年来,Lab颜色空间已广泛用于颜色的客观定量分析。L、a和b值分别代表从黑色到白色的亮度变化、从绿色到红色的色度变化以及从蓝色到黄色的色度变化。本研究旨在检验尿液颜色Lab*参数评估运动员水合水平的有效性。

方法

该研究共纳入474名年轻优秀运动员(男性251名,女性223名,年龄:24.59±4.86岁)。在水合的各个阶段从受试者收集了总共803份尿液样本,包括晨尿和补液期间的随机尿样。Lab*参数用分光光度计测量。通过尿渗透压和尿比重评估水合状态。

结果

尿液颜色b值与尿比重和尿渗透压高度相关(r = 0.811,0.741,均<0.01);L值与尿比重和尿渗透压中度相关(r = -0.508,-0.471,均<0.01);a值与尿比重、尿渗透压之间无显著相关性(>0.05)。无论根据尿比重(Usg)≥1.020或尿渗透压(Uosm)≥700 mmol/kg诊断低水合:b值的曲线下面积(AUC)均高于0.9,b值的特异性和敏感性均较高(均大于80%)。L和a值的AUC均小于0.5。无论根据尿比重(Usg)≤1.010或尿渗透压(Uosm)≤500 mmol/kg诊断高水合:b值的AUC均高于0.9,b值的特异性和敏感性均较高(均大于90%)。L和a*值的AUC均小于0.5。

结论

这些结果表明,尿液颜色b值评估运动员水合状态的有效性较高,然而,尿液颜色L和a*值的有效性较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79e5/9399725/b00944aca2fc/fnut-09-997189-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验