• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尿色(LUC)图表法可用于识别活跃人群中的脱水状况。

A lavatory urine color (LUC) chart method can identify hypohydration in a physically active population.

机构信息

College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Herberger Institute for Design and the Arts, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Nutr. 2021 Aug;60(5):2795-2805. doi: 10.1007/s00394-020-02460-5. Epub 2021 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00394-020-02460-5
PMID:33416980
Abstract

PURPOSE

To provide a new and efficient at-the-toilet-bowl method of self-assessing urine concentration via urine color (Uc) to identify hypohydration.

METHODS

A large athletic population (n = 189) delivered a urine sample, then chose a color panel that was displayed on the back wall of the lavatory stall. Selection was based on duration of urine voiding time, so that for a short-duration, the lighter panel was selected; for a mid-duration, the mid color panel; and for a longer-void-duration, the darker panel was selected. Then, subjects noted if their urine was lighter than, similar to, or darker than the selected color panel. Trained investigators also rated subjects' urine samples. To assess validity of Uc classification, the outcome was compared with a urine concentration (urine specific gravity, USG, and urine osmolality) threshold indicating hypohydration.

RESULTS

Urine color was scored similarly by subjects and investigators (P = 0.99). Based on receiver operating curves (ROC), the method scored fair, i.e., the area under the curve ranging 0.73-0.82, with an accuracy of participants and investigators correctly classifying 72% and 75% urine samples compared to a USG threshold of 1.020, respectively, and 62% and 70% compared to a urine osmolality threshold of 836 mmol·kg, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This new lavatory urine color (LUC) method of scoring Uc levels to assess potential hypohydration gives results similar to those of traditional urine color charts, but it has the advantage of an immediate assessment of hydration status based on scoring urine color directly from the toilet bowl.

摘要

目的

提供一种新的、高效的在马桶上通过尿液颜色(Uc)自我评估尿液浓缩情况的方法,以识别脱水。

方法

大量运动员(n=189)提供尿液样本,然后从厕所隔间后墙上显示的颜色面板中选择一个。选择基于尿液排空时间的长短,因此短时间排空时选择浅色面板;中等时间排空时选择中间色面板;长时间排空时选择深色面板。然后,受试者记录他们的尿液比所选颜色面板更浅、相似还是更深。经过培训的研究人员也对受试者的尿液样本进行了评估。为了评估 Uc 分类的有效性,将结果与尿液浓度(尿比重、尿渗透压)阈值进行比较,以指示脱水。

结果

受试者和研究人员对尿液颜色的评分相似(P=0.99)。根据受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),该方法的评分中等,即曲线下面积在 0.73-0.82 之间,参与者和研究人员的准确率分别为 72%和 75%,正确分类的尿液样本比例分别为 72%和 75%,而 USG 阈值为 1.020,尿渗透压阈值为 836mmol·kg 时,准确率分别为 62%和 70%。

结论

这种新的马桶尿液颜色(LUC)评分方法评估潜在脱水时,Uc 水平的结果与传统尿液颜色图表相似,但它具有基于从马桶直接评分尿液颜色即时评估水合状态的优势。

相似文献

1
A lavatory urine color (LUC) chart method can identify hypohydration in a physically active population.尿色(LUC)图表法可用于识别活跃人群中的脱水状况。
Eur J Nutr. 2021 Aug;60(5):2795-2805. doi: 10.1007/s00394-020-02460-5. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
2
Athletes' Self-Assessment of Urine Color Using Two Color Charts to Determine Urine Concentration.运动员使用两种色卡对尿液颜色进行自我评估以确定尿液浓度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 13;18(8):4126. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084126.
3
Clinical utility of urine specific gravity, electrical conductivity, and color as on-farm methods for evaluating urine concentration in dairy cattle.尿比重、电导率和颜色作为评估奶牛尿液浓缩程度的农场方法的临床实用性。
J Vet Intern Med. 2019 May;33(3):1530-1539. doi: 10.1111/jvim.15502. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
4
Validation of a urine color scale for assessment of urine osmolality in healthy children.用于评估健康儿童尿渗透压的尿液颜色量表的验证
Eur J Nutr. 2016 Apr;55(3):907-15. doi: 10.1007/s00394-015-0905-2. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
5
Validity of Urine Color Scoring Using Different Light Conditions and Scoring Techniques to Assess Urine Concentration.不同光照条件和评分技术下的尿液颜色评分评估尿液浓度的有效性。
J Athl Train. 2022 Feb 1;57(2):191-198. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0389.21.
6
Water-loss (intracellular) dehydration assessed using urinary tests: how well do they work? Diagnostic accuracy in older people.尿检测评估细胞内失水(脱水):它们的效果如何?老年人的诊断准确性。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Jul;104(1):121-31. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.119925. Epub 2016 May 25.
7
Storing urine samples with moisture preserves urine hydration marker stability up to 21 days.将尿液样本与水分一起储存可使尿液水合标志物稳定性保持长达21天。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2023 Jun;55(6):1413-1419. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03581-6. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
8
Urine Reagent Strips Are Inaccurate for Assessing Hypohydration: A Brief Report.尿液试剂条在评估脱水方面并不准确:简要报告。
Clin J Sport Med. 2019 Nov;29(6):506-508. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000555.
9
Combining urine color and void number to assess hydration in adults and children.结合尿色和排尿次数评估成人和儿童的液体摄入情况。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2021 Aug;75(8):1262-1266. doi: 10.1038/s41430-020-00834-w. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
10
The Validity of Urine Color as a Hydration Biomarker within the General Adult Population and Athletes: A Systematic Review.尿液颜色作为一般成年人群和运动员水合生物标志物的有效性:一项系统评价。
J Am Coll Nutr. 2021 Feb;40(2):172-179. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2020.1750073. Epub 2020 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity of combined hydration self-assessment measurements to estimate a low vs. high urine concentration in a small sample of (tactical) athletes.在一小部分(战术)运动员样本中,联合水化自我评估测量用于估计低尿浓度与高尿浓度的有效性。
Eur J Nutr. 2024 Feb;63(1):185-193. doi: 10.1007/s00394-023-03254-1. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
2
Validation of urine colour L*a*b* for assessing hydration amongst athletes.用于评估运动员水合状态的尿液颜色L*a*b*值验证
Front Nutr. 2022 Aug 10;9:997189. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.997189. eCollection 2022.
3
Validity of Urine Color Scoring Using Different Light Conditions and Scoring Techniques to Assess Urine Concentration.

本文引用的文献

1
National Athletic Trainers' Association Position Statement: Fluid Replacement for the Physically Active.美国国家运动训练师协会立场声明:针对体育活动者的液体补充
J Athl Train. 2017 Sep;52(9):877-895. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-52.9.02.
2
Criterion values for urine-specific gravity and urine color representing adequate water intake in healthy adults.代表健康成年人充足水摄入量的尿比重和尿色的标准值。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2017 Apr;71(4):561-563. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.269. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
3
The Effect of Storing Temperature and Duration on Urinary Hydration Markers.
不同光照条件和评分技术下的尿液颜色评分评估尿液浓度的有效性。
J Athl Train. 2022 Feb 1;57(2):191-198. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0389.21.
4
Analysis of the Distribution of Urine Color and Its Relationship With Urine Dry Chemical Parameters Among College Students in Beijing, China - A Cross-Sectional Study.中国北京大学生尿液颜色分布及其与尿液干化学参数关系的分析——一项横断面研究
Front Nutr. 2021 Oct 4;8:719260. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.719260. eCollection 2021.
5
Estimates of fluid intake, urine output and hydration-levels in women from Somaliland: a cross-sectional study.索马里兰女性液体摄入量、尿量和水合水平的估计:一项横断面研究。
J Nutr Sci. 2021 Aug 20;10:e66. doi: 10.1017/jns.2021.54. eCollection 2021.
6
Athletes' Self-Assessment of Urine Color Using Two Color Charts to Determine Urine Concentration.运动员使用两种色卡对尿液颜色进行自我评估以确定尿液浓度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 13;18(8):4126. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084126.
储存温度和时长对尿水化标志物的影响。
Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2017 Feb;27(1):18-24. doi: 10.1123/ijsnem.2016-0098. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
4
Validity of Urine Specific Gravity When Compared With Plasma Osmolality as a Measure of Hydration Status in Male and Female NCAA Collegiate Athletes.与血浆渗透压相比,尿比重作为衡量美国大学体育协会(NCAA)男女大学生运动员水合状态指标的有效性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2016 Aug;30(8):2219-25. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001313.
5
Urine color as an indicator of urine concentration in pregnant and lactating women.尿液颜色作为孕妇和哺乳期妇女尿液浓缩程度的指标。
Eur J Nutr. 2017 Feb;56(1):355-362. doi: 10.1007/s00394-015-1085-9. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
6
An empirical method to determine inadequacy of dietary water.一种确定膳食水分不足的实证方法。
Nutrition. 2016 Jan;32(1):79-82. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2015.07.013. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
7
Validation of a urine color scale for assessment of urine osmolality in healthy children.用于评估健康儿童尿渗透压的尿液颜色量表的验证
Eur J Nutr. 2016 Apr;55(3):907-15. doi: 10.1007/s00394-015-0905-2. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
8
Assessment of hydration status in a large population.对大量人群的水合状态评估。
Br J Nutr. 2015 Jan 14;113(1):147-58. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514003213. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
9
Drinking to thirst versus drinking ad libitum during road cycling.公路自行车骑行过程中口渴时饮水与随意饮水的对比
J Athl Train. 2014 Sep-Oct;49(5):624-31. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.3.85. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
10
Biological variation and diagnostic accuracy of dehydration assessment markers.脱水评估标志物的生物学变异和诊断准确性。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Sep;92(3):565-73. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29490. Epub 2010 Jul 14.