Regus Maksimus, Tapung Marianus, Jelahut Marianus S
Universitas Katolik Indonesia Santu Paulus Ruteng, Manggarai, Indonesia.
J Hum Rights Soc Work. 2022;7(3):277-284. doi: 10.1007/s41134-022-00215-2. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
This article argues that the right to have and express freedom can be restricted for several reasons, including a public safety emergency. In line with this idea, this article discusses government regulations in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which had a crucial impact on the discourse on the right to freedom in Indonesia. Methodologically, this study uses critical qualitative analysis to overview the focus issue of this research in academic work and mainstream media coverage. At this point, this study uses relevant and recently published information regarding the intersection between Indonesian government regulations related to COVID-19 and the manifestation of the right to freedom, especially freedom of religion. This article provides an essential finding that restrictions on the right to have freedom are justified in consideration of public health due to the COVID-19 pandemic. International human rights conventions explain this mechanism. This article is a timely and contextual academic review with two contributions. First, this article theoretically adds information to academic discussions around the intersection between human rights, religion, and state regulation. Second, this study will help the state and religion build a constructive response to the COVID-19 pandemic and future crises. This contribution can be elaborated more profound and comprehensive in future research.
本文认为,拥有和表达自由的权利可能会因多种原因受到限制,包括公共安全紧急情况。基于这一观点,本文讨论了政府针对新冠疫情的相关规定,这些规定对印度尼西亚关于自由权利的讨论产生了至关重要的影响。从方法论上讲,本研究采用批判性定性分析方法,以概述该研究在学术著作和主流媒体报道中的核心问题。就此而言,本研究使用了与印度尼西亚新冠疫情相关政府规定和自由权利表现形式(尤其是宗教自由)之间交叉点有关的最新相关信息。本文得出一项重要结论,即鉴于新冠疫情,出于公共卫生考虑,对拥有自由权利的限制是合理的。国际人权公约对此机制进行了解释。本文是一篇及时且结合具体背景的学术综述,有两点贡献。第一,本文在理论上为围绕人权、宗教和国家监管交叉点的学术讨论增添了信息。第二,本研究将有助于国家和宗教对新冠疫情及未来危机做出建设性回应。这一贡献可在未来研究中得到更深入和全面的阐述。