• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Predicting Treatment Response in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy.深度学习模型在预测新发癫痫患者治疗反应中的开发与验证
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Oct 1;79(10):986-996. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2514.
2
Development and validation of machine learning models for prediction of seizure outcome after pediatric epilepsy surgery.机器学习模型在儿童癫痫手术后癫痫发作结果预测中的开发和验证。
Epilepsia. 2022 Aug;63(8):1956-1969. doi: 10.1111/epi.17320. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
3
Tolerability of Antiseizure Medications in Individuals With Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy.新发癫痫患者的抗癫痫药物耐受性。
JAMA Neurol. 2020 May 1;77(5):574-581. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.0032.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Markov modelling of treatment response in a 30-year cohort study of newly diagnosed epilepsy.30 年新诊断癫痫队列研究中治疗反应的马尔可夫模型。
Brain. 2022 May 24;145(4):1326-1337. doi: 10.1093/brain/awab401.
6
Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy Treated With Established and New Antiepileptic Drugs: A 30-Year Longitudinal Cohort Study.新诊断癫痫患者使用现有和新型抗癫痫药物治疗的治疗结局:一项长达 30 年的纵向队列研究。
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Mar 1;75(3):279-286. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3949.
7
Response to subsequent antiseizure medications after first antiseizure medication failure in newly diagnosed epilepsy.新诊断癫痫患者首次抗癫痫药物治疗失败后对后续抗癫痫药物的反应。
Front Neurol. 2022 Nov 10;13:1042168. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1042168. eCollection 2022.
8
Characteristics and treatment outcomes of newly diagnosed epilepsy in older people: A 30-year longitudinal cohort study.老年人新诊断癫痫的特征和治疗结果:一项 30 年的纵向队列研究。
Epilepsia. 2020 Dec;61(12):2720-2728. doi: 10.1111/epi.16721. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
9
The evolution of antiseizure medication therapy selection in adults: Is artificial intelligence -assisted antiseizure medication selection ready for prime time?成人抗癫痫药物治疗选择的演变:人工智能辅助的抗癫痫药物选择准备好进入黄金时代了吗?
J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2023 Oct 18;15:11795735231209209. doi: 10.1177/11795735231209209. eCollection 2023.
10
Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Tool to Rule Out COVID-19 Among Adults in the Emergency Department Using Routine Blood Tests: A Large, Multicenter, Real-World Study.利用常规血液检测排除急诊科成人COVID-19的机器学习工具的开发与外部验证:一项大型、多中心、真实世界研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 2;22(12):e24048. doi: 10.2196/24048.

引用本文的文献

1
An interpretable machine learning approach for predicting drug-resistant epilepsy in children with tuberous sclerosis complex.一种用于预测结节性硬化症患儿耐药性癫痫的可解释机器学习方法。
Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 4;16:1623212. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1623212. eCollection 2025.
2
Harnessing artificial intelligence for brain disease: advances in diagnosis, drug discovery, and closed-loop therapeutics.利用人工智能应对脑部疾病:诊断、药物研发及闭环治疗方面的进展
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 28;16:1615523. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1615523. eCollection 2025.
3
Multi-omics: a bridge connecting genotype and phenotype for epilepsy?多组学:连接癫痫的基因型和表型的桥梁?
Biomark Res. 2025 Jun 18;13(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s40364-025-00798-8.
4
Multi-dimensional feature extraction of EEG signal and its application in stroke classification.脑电信号的多维特征提取及其在中风分类中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 4;15(1):19589. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04756-0.
5
Topographic differences in EEG microstates: distinguishing juvenile myoclonic epilepsy from frontal lobe epilepsy.脑电图微状态的地形差异:区分青少年肌阵挛癫痫与额叶癫痫。
Cogn Neurodyn. 2025 Dec;19(1):72. doi: 10.1007/s11571-025-10255-9. Epub 2025 May 10.
6
Personalised selection of medication for newly diagnosed adult epilepsy: study protocol of a first-in-class, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.新诊断成年癫痫患者的个性化药物选择:一项同类首创的双盲随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 5;15(4):e086607. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086607.
7
Towards precision MRI biomarkers in epilepsy with normative modelling.基于规范建模的癫痫精准MRI生物标志物研究
Brain. 2025 Jul 7;148(7):2247-2261. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaf090.
8
Machine learning for identification of short-term all-cause and cardiovascular deaths among patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis.用于识别接受腹膜透析患者短期全因死亡和心血管死亡的机器学习
Clin Kidney J. 2024 Aug 29;17(9):sfae242. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae242. eCollection 2024 Sep.
9
Machine learning-based pan-cancer study of classification and mechanism of BRAF inhibitor resistance.基于机器学习的BRAF抑制剂耐药性分类及机制的泛癌研究
Transl Cancer Res. 2024 Dec 31;13(12):6645-6660. doi: 10.21037/tcr-24-961. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
10
Artificial Intelligence: Fundamentals and Breakthrough Applications in Epilepsy.人工智能:癫痫领域的基础与突破性应用
Epilepsy Curr. 2024 Mar 31:15357597241238526. doi: 10.1177/15357597241238526.

深度学习模型在预测新发癫痫患者治疗反应中的开发与验证

Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Model for Predicting Treatment Response in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Department of Neurology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

JAMA Neurol. 2022 Oct 1;79(10):986-996. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2514.

DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2514
PMID:36036923
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9425285/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Selection of antiseizure medications (ASMs) for epilepsy remains largely a trial-and-error approach. Under this approach, many patients have to endure sequential trials of ineffective treatments until the "right drugs" are prescribed.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a deep learning model using readily available clinical information to predict treatment success with the first ASM for individual patients.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study developed and validated a prognostic model. Patients were treated between 1982 and 2020. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year or until failure of the first ASM. A total of 2404 adults with epilepsy newly treated at specialist clinics in Scotland, Malaysia, Australia, and China between 1982 and 2020 were considered for inclusion, of whom 606 (25.2%) were excluded from the final cohort because of missing information in 1 or more variables.

EXPOSURES

One of 7 antiseizure medications.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

With the use of the transformer model architecture on 16 clinical factors and ASM information, this cohort study first pooled all cohorts for model training and testing. The model was trained again using the largest cohort and externally validated on the other 4 cohorts. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), weighted balanced accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the model were all assessed for predicting treatment success based on the optimal probability cutoff. Treatment success was defined as complete seizure freedom for the first year of treatment while taking the first ASM. Performance of the transformer model was compared with other machine learning models.

RESULTS

The final pooled cohort included 1798 adults (54.5% female; median age, 34 years [IQR, 24-50 years]). The transformer model that was trained using the pooled cohort had an AUROC of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.63-0.67) and a weighted balanced accuracy of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.60-0.64) on the test set. The model that was trained using the largest cohort only had AUROCs ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 and a weighted balanced accuracy ranging from 0.51 to 0.62 in the external validation cohorts. Number of pretreatment seizures, presence of psychiatric disorders, electroencephalography, and brain imaging findings were the most important clinical variables for predicted outcomes in both models. The transformer model that was developed using the pooled cohort outperformed 2 of the 5 other models tested in terms of AUROC.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, a deep learning model showed the feasibility of personalized prediction of response to ASMs based on clinical information. With improvement of performance, such as by incorporating genetic and imaging data, this model may potentially assist clinicians in selecting the right drug at the first trial.

摘要

重要性

抗癫痫药物(ASM)的选择对于癫痫仍然主要是一种尝试和错误的方法。在这种方法下,许多患者不得不忍受无效治疗的连续试验,直到开出“正确的药物”。

目的

开发和验证一种使用现成临床信息预测个体患者使用第一种 ASM 治疗成功的深度学习模型。

设计、地点和参与者:这项队列研究开发并验证了一种预测模型。患者于 1982 年至 2020 年之间接受治疗。所有患者均随访至少 1 年或直至第一种 ASM 治疗失败。共纳入 1982 年至 2020 年期间在苏格兰、马来西亚、澳大利亚和中国的专家诊所接受新治疗的 2404 名成年癫痫患者,其中 606 名(25.2%)因一个或多个变量的信息缺失而被排除在最终队列之外。

暴露

7 种抗癫痫药物之一。

主要结果和测量

使用转换器模型架构和 16 个临床因素和 ASM 信息,本队列研究首先对所有队列进行模型训练和测试。然后使用最大队列再次训练模型,并在其他 4 个队列上进行外部验证。使用最佳概率截止值,评估模型在预测治疗成功方面的曲线下面积(AUROC)、加权平衡准确性、敏感性和特异性。治疗成功定义为在服用第一种 ASM 的第一年完全无癫痫发作。比较了转换器模型与其他机器学习模型的性能。

结果

最终汇总队列包括 1798 名成年人(54.5%为女性;中位年龄为 34 岁[IQR,24-50 岁])。使用汇总队列训练的转换器模型在测试集中的 AUROC 为 0.65(95%CI,0.63-0.67),加权平衡准确性为 0.62(95%CI,0.60-0.64)。仅使用最大队列训练的模型在外部验证队列中的 AUROC 范围为 0.52 至 0.60,加权平衡准确性范围为 0.51 至 0.62。在两个模型中,治疗前癫痫发作次数、存在精神疾病、脑电图和脑成像发现都是预测结果的最重要临床变量。在使用汇总队列开发的转换器模型中,在 AUROC 方面优于测试的 5 个其他模型中的 2 个。

结论和相关性

在这项队列研究中,深度学习模型展示了基于临床信息预测 ASM 反应的个性化的可行性。通过提高性能,例如纳入遗传和成像数据,该模型可能有助于临床医生在首次尝试时选择正确的药物。