Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Neurology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
JAMA Neurol. 2022 Oct 1;79(10):986-996. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.2514.
Selection of antiseizure medications (ASMs) for epilepsy remains largely a trial-and-error approach. Under this approach, many patients have to endure sequential trials of ineffective treatments until the "right drugs" are prescribed.
To develop and validate a deep learning model using readily available clinical information to predict treatment success with the first ASM for individual patients.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study developed and validated a prognostic model. Patients were treated between 1982 and 2020. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 1 year or until failure of the first ASM. A total of 2404 adults with epilepsy newly treated at specialist clinics in Scotland, Malaysia, Australia, and China between 1982 and 2020 were considered for inclusion, of whom 606 (25.2%) were excluded from the final cohort because of missing information in 1 or more variables.
One of 7 antiseizure medications.
With the use of the transformer model architecture on 16 clinical factors and ASM information, this cohort study first pooled all cohorts for model training and testing. The model was trained again using the largest cohort and externally validated on the other 4 cohorts. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), weighted balanced accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the model were all assessed for predicting treatment success based on the optimal probability cutoff. Treatment success was defined as complete seizure freedom for the first year of treatment while taking the first ASM. Performance of the transformer model was compared with other machine learning models.
The final pooled cohort included 1798 adults (54.5% female; median age, 34 years [IQR, 24-50 years]). The transformer model that was trained using the pooled cohort had an AUROC of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.63-0.67) and a weighted balanced accuracy of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.60-0.64) on the test set. The model that was trained using the largest cohort only had AUROCs ranging from 0.52 to 0.60 and a weighted balanced accuracy ranging from 0.51 to 0.62 in the external validation cohorts. Number of pretreatment seizures, presence of psychiatric disorders, electroencephalography, and brain imaging findings were the most important clinical variables for predicted outcomes in both models. The transformer model that was developed using the pooled cohort outperformed 2 of the 5 other models tested in terms of AUROC.
In this cohort study, a deep learning model showed the feasibility of personalized prediction of response to ASMs based on clinical information. With improvement of performance, such as by incorporating genetic and imaging data, this model may potentially assist clinicians in selecting the right drug at the first trial.
抗癫痫药物(ASM)的选择对于癫痫仍然主要是一种尝试和错误的方法。在这种方法下,许多患者不得不忍受无效治疗的连续试验,直到开出“正确的药物”。
开发和验证一种使用现成临床信息预测个体患者使用第一种 ASM 治疗成功的深度学习模型。
设计、地点和参与者:这项队列研究开发并验证了一种预测模型。患者于 1982 年至 2020 年之间接受治疗。所有患者均随访至少 1 年或直至第一种 ASM 治疗失败。共纳入 1982 年至 2020 年期间在苏格兰、马来西亚、澳大利亚和中国的专家诊所接受新治疗的 2404 名成年癫痫患者,其中 606 名(25.2%)因一个或多个变量的信息缺失而被排除在最终队列之外。
7 种抗癫痫药物之一。
使用转换器模型架构和 16 个临床因素和 ASM 信息,本队列研究首先对所有队列进行模型训练和测试。然后使用最大队列再次训练模型,并在其他 4 个队列上进行外部验证。使用最佳概率截止值,评估模型在预测治疗成功方面的曲线下面积(AUROC)、加权平衡准确性、敏感性和特异性。治疗成功定义为在服用第一种 ASM 的第一年完全无癫痫发作。比较了转换器模型与其他机器学习模型的性能。
最终汇总队列包括 1798 名成年人(54.5%为女性;中位年龄为 34 岁[IQR,24-50 岁])。使用汇总队列训练的转换器模型在测试集中的 AUROC 为 0.65(95%CI,0.63-0.67),加权平衡准确性为 0.62(95%CI,0.60-0.64)。仅使用最大队列训练的模型在外部验证队列中的 AUROC 范围为 0.52 至 0.60,加权平衡准确性范围为 0.51 至 0.62。在两个模型中,治疗前癫痫发作次数、存在精神疾病、脑电图和脑成像发现都是预测结果的最重要临床变量。在使用汇总队列开发的转换器模型中,在 AUROC 方面优于测试的 5 个其他模型中的 2 个。
在这项队列研究中,深度学习模型展示了基于临床信息预测 ASM 反应的个性化的可行性。通过提高性能,例如纳入遗传和成像数据,该模型可能有助于临床医生在首次尝试时选择正确的药物。