• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性背痛患者预防和治疗抑郁症的数字干预中辍学的预测因素:两项随机对照试验的二次分析。

Predictors of Dropout in a Digital Intervention for the Prevention and Treatment of Depression in Patients With Chronic Back Pain: Secondary Analysis of Two Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Logopedics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 30;24(8):e38261. doi: 10.2196/38261.

DOI:10.2196/38261
PMID:36040780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9472049/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Depression is a common comorbid condition in individuals with chronic back pain (CBP), leading to poorer treatment outcomes and increased medical complications. Digital interventions have demonstrated efficacy in the prevention and treatment of depression; however, high dropout rates are a major challenge, particularly in clinical settings.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to identify the predictors of dropout in a digital intervention for the treatment and prevention of depression in patients with comorbid CBP. We assessed which participant characteristics may be associated with dropout and whether intervention usage data could help improve the identification of individuals at risk of dropout early on in treatment.

METHODS

Data were collected from 2 large-scale randomized controlled trials in which 253 patients with a diagnosis of CBP and major depressive disorder or subclinical depressive symptoms received a digital intervention for depression. In the first analysis, participants' baseline characteristics were examined as potential predictors of dropout. In the second analysis, we assessed the extent to which dropout could be predicted from a combination of participants' baseline characteristics and intervention usage variables following the completion of the first module. Dropout was defined as completing <6 modules. Analyses were conducted using logistic regression.

RESULTS

From participants' baseline characteristics, lower level of education (odds ratio [OR] 3.33, 95% CI 1.51-7.32) and both lower and higher age (a quadratic effect; age: OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47-0.82, and age: OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.18-2.04) were significantly associated with a higher risk of dropout. In the analysis that aimed to predict dropout following completion of the first module, lower and higher age (age: OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.42-0.85; age: OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.13-2.23), medium versus high social support (OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.25-7.33), and a higher number of days to module completion (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08) predicted a higher risk of dropout, whereas a self-reported negative event in the previous week was associated with a lower risk of dropout (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.08-0.69). A model that combined baseline characteristics and intervention usage data generated the most accurate predictions (area under the receiver operating curve [AUC]=0.72) and was significantly more accurate than models based on baseline characteristics only (AUC=0.70) or intervention usage data only (AUC=0.61). We found no significant influence of pain, disability, or depression severity on dropout.

CONCLUSIONS

Dropout can be predicted by participant baseline variables, and the inclusion of intervention usage variables may improve the prediction of dropout early on in treatment. Being able to identify individuals at high risk of dropout from digital health interventions could provide intervention developers and supporting clinicians with the ability to intervene early and prevent dropout from occurring.

摘要

背景

抑郁症是慢性背痛(CBP)患者常见的合并症,导致治疗效果较差和增加医疗并发症。数字干预措施已被证明在预防和治疗抑郁症方面有效;然而,高辍学率是一个主要挑战,尤其是在临床环境中。

目的

本研究旨在确定针对 CBP 合并症患者治疗和预防抑郁症的数字干预措施中辍学的预测因素。我们评估了哪些参与者特征可能与辍学有关,以及干预使用数据是否可以帮助在治疗早期更早地识别有辍学风险的个体。

方法

数据来自两项大型随机对照试验,其中 253 名患有 CBP 和重度抑郁症或亚临床抑郁症状的患者接受了抑郁症的数字干预。在第一次分析中,检查了参与者的基线特征,作为辍学的潜在预测因素。在第二次分析中,我们评估了从参与者的基线特征和干预使用变量的组合中,可以从多大程度上预测在完成第一个模块后的辍学。辍学被定义为完成<6 个模块。分析使用逻辑回归进行。

结果

从参与者的基线特征来看,较低的教育水平(优势比[OR]3.33,95%置信区间[CI]1.51-7.32)和较低及较高的年龄(二次效应;年龄:OR 0.62,95%CI 0.47-0.82,年龄:OR 1.55,95%CI 1.18-2.04)与较高的辍学风险显著相关。在旨在预测完成第一个模块后的辍学的分析中,较低和较高的年龄(年龄:OR 0.60,95%CI 0.42-0.85;年龄:OR 1.59,95%CI 1.13-2.23)、中等与较高的社会支持(OR 3.03,95%CI 1.25-7.33)和完成模块的天数较多(OR 1.05,95%CI 1.02-1.08)预测辍学风险较高,而在前一周报告的负面事件与较低的辍学风险相关(OR 0.24,95%CI 0.08-0.69)。结合基线特征和干预使用数据的模型产生了最准确的预测(接受者操作特征曲线下面积[AUC]为 0.72),并且明显优于仅基于基线特征(AUC=0.70)或仅基于干预使用数据(AUC=0.61)的模型。我们没有发现疼痛、残疾或抑郁严重程度对辍学有显著影响。

结论

可以通过参与者的基线变量预测辍学,并且包含干预使用变量可能会提高治疗早期辍学的预测能力。能够从数字健康干预措施中识别出高辍学风险的个体,可以为干预措施的开发者和支持临床医生提供早期干预的能力,从而防止辍学的发生。

相似文献

1
Predictors of Dropout in a Digital Intervention for the Prevention and Treatment of Depression in Patients With Chronic Back Pain: Secondary Analysis of Two Randomized Controlled Trials.慢性背痛患者预防和治疗抑郁症的数字干预中辍学的预测因素:两项随机对照试验的二次分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 30;24(8):e38261. doi: 10.2196/38261.
2
Can a Single Variable Predict Early Dropout From Digital Health Interventions? Comparison of Predictive Models From Two Large Randomized Trials.单一变量能否预测数字健康干预的早期辍学?来自两项大型随机试验的预测模型比较。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 20;25:e43629. doi: 10.2196/43629.
3
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a guided Internet- and mobile-based intervention for the indicated prevention of major depression in patients with chronic back pain-study protocol of the PROD-BP multicenter pragmatic RCT.一项基于互联网和移动设备的指导性干预措施对慢性背痛患者预防重度抑郁症的有效性和成本效益——PROD-BP多中心实用随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jan 21;17(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1193-6.
4
Effectiveness of a Guided Web-Based Self-help Intervention to Prevent Depression in Patients With Persistent Back Pain: The PROD-BP Randomized Clinical Trial.基于网络的有指导的自助干预预防持续性背痛患者抑郁的效果:PROD-BP 随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 1;77(10):1001-1011. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.1021.
5
A Web- and Mobile-Based Intervention for Comorbid, Recurrent Depression in Patients With Chronic Back Pain on Sick Leave (Get.Back): Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial on Feasibility, User Satisfaction, and Effectiveness.一项针对病假中的慢性背痛患者合并复发性抑郁症的基于网络和移动设备的干预措施(Get.Back):关于可行性、用户满意度和有效性的试点随机对照试验
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Apr 15;7(4):e16398. doi: 10.2196/16398.
6
Predictors of adherence to an internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy program for individuals with chronic pain and comorbid psychological distress.预测慢性疼痛和共病心理困扰个体对基于互联网的认知行为疗法项目的依从性。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Oct 12;9(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00663-x.
7
Dropout Rate in Digital Health Interventions for the Prevention of Skin Cancer: Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Metaregression.数字健康干预措施预防皮肤癌的辍学率:系统评价、荟萃分析和元回归。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Dec 9;24(12):e42397. doi: 10.2196/42397.
8
Exploring the Relationship Between Usage and Outcomes of an Internet-Based Intervention for Individuals With Depressive Symptoms: Secondary Analysis of Data From a Randomized Controlled Trial.探索基于互联网的抑郁症症状个体干预措施的使用情况与效果之间的关系:一项随机对照试验数据的二次分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 1;21(8):e12775. doi: 10.2196/12775.
9
Effectiveness of a Guided Internet- and Mobile-Based Intervention for Patients with Chronic Back Pain and Depression (WARD-BP): A Multicenter, Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.一项针对慢性背痛和抑郁症患者的基于互联网和移动设备的引导式干预措施(WARD - BP)的有效性:一项多中心实用随机对照试验。
Psychother Psychosom. 2021;90(4):255-268. doi: 10.1159/000511881. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
10
Dropout from exercise randomized controlled trials among people with depression: A meta-analysis and meta regression.抑郁症患者运动随机对照试验中的脱落情况:一项荟萃分析与元回归分析
J Affect Disord. 2016 Jan 15;190:457-466. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.10.019. Epub 2015 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Web-Based Video Intervention and Associated Factors for the Uptake of the Catch-Up Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in Japan: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于网络的视频干预及日本补种人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种率的相关因素:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 15;27:e67778. doi: 10.2196/67778.
2
Exploring dropout in internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia: A secondary analysis of prevalence, self-reported reasons, and baseline and intervention data as predictors.探索互联网认知行为疗法治疗失眠中的脱落情况:患病率、自我报告原因以及作为预测因素的基线和干预数据的二次分析
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2025 Jul-Sep;25(3):100598. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2025.100598. Epub 2025 Jun 28.
3
Predictors of dropout in cognitive behavior and interpersonal online brief psychotherapies for essential professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间针对一线专业人员的认知行为与人际在线简短心理治疗中退出治疗的预测因素
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 5;14(1):30316. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81327-9.
4
Meeting people where they are: Crowdsourcing goal-specific personalized wellness practices.在人们所处的地方与他们相遇:众包特定目标的个性化健康实践。
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 Nov 19;3(11):e0000650. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000650. eCollection 2024 Nov.
5
Reinforcement Learning Interventions on Boundedly Rational Human Agents in Frictionful Tasks.摩擦任务中对有限理性人类智能体的强化学习干预
Proc Int Joint Conf Auton Agents Multiagent Syst. 2024 May;2024:1482-1491. Epub 2024 May 6.
6
Internet-based self-administered intervention to reduce anxiety and depression symptomatology and improve well-being in 7 countries: protocol of a randomized control trial.基于互联网的自我管理干预措施以减轻7个国家的焦虑和抑郁症状并改善幸福感:一项随机对照试验方案
Front Psychol. 2024 May 7;15:1279847. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1279847. eCollection 2024.
7
Dataset size versus homogeneity: A machine learning study on pooling intervention data in e-mental health dropout predictions.数据集规模与同质性:一项关于在电子心理健康辍学预测中合并干预数据的机器学习研究。
Digit Health. 2024 May 15;10:20552076241248920. doi: 10.1177/20552076241248920. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
8
Persuasive technologies design for mental and behavioral health platforms: A scoping literature review.针对心理和行为健康平台的劝导技术设计:一项范围界定文献综述
PLOS Digit Health. 2024 May 16;3(5):e0000498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000498. eCollection 2024 May.
9
Effective Communication Supported by an App for Pregnant Women: Quantitative Longitudinal Study.应用程序支持下的孕妇有效沟通:定量纵向研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Apr 26;11:e48218. doi: 10.2196/48218.
10
The Effects of a Digital, Transdiagnostic, Clinically and Peer-Moderated Treatment Platform for Young People With Emerging Mental Health Complaints: Repeated Measures Within-Subjects Study.数字化、跨诊断、临床和同行监督的治疗平台对有早期心理健康问题的年轻人的影响:基于重复测量的被试内研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Dec 13;11:e50636. doi: 10.2196/50636.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital interventions for the treatment of depression: A meta-analytic review.数字干预措施治疗抑郁症的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2021 Aug;147(8):749-786. doi: 10.1037/bul0000334.
2
Impact of guidance on intervention adherence in computerised interventions for mental health problems: a meta-analysis.计算机化干预措施治疗心理健康问题时,指导对干预依从性的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2022 Jan;52(2):229-240. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721004621. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
3
Dropout From an Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Intervention for Adults With Depression and Anxiety: Qualitative Study.针对患有抑郁症和焦虑症的成年人的互联网认知行为疗法干预中的退出情况:定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Nov 12;5(11):e26221. doi: 10.2196/26221.
4
The growing field of digital psychiatry: current evidence and the future of apps, social media, chatbots, and virtual reality.数字精神病学的发展领域:当前证据以及应用程序、社交媒体、聊天机器人和虚拟现实的未来。
World Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;20(3):318-335. doi: 10.1002/wps.20883.
5
Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Network Meta-analysis.基于互联网的抑郁症认知行为疗法:系统评价和个体患者数据网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 1;78(4):361-371. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4364.
6
Effectiveness of a Guided Internet- and Mobile-Based Intervention for Patients with Chronic Back Pain and Depression (WARD-BP): A Multicenter, Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.一项针对慢性背痛和抑郁症患者的基于互联网和移动设备的引导式干预措施(WARD - BP)的有效性:一项多中心实用随机对照试验。
Psychother Psychosom. 2021;90(4):255-268. doi: 10.1159/000511881. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
7
Developing a Process for the Analysis of User Journeys and the Prediction of Dropout in Digital Health Interventions: Machine Learning Approach.开发一种用于分析用户旅程和预测数字健康干预措施中辍学的方法:机器学习方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 28;22(10):e17738. doi: 10.2196/17738.
8
Predictors of Dropout in Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression.基于互联网的抑郁症认知行为疗法中脱落的预测因素
Cognit Ther Res. 2019 Jun;43(3):620-630. doi: 10.1007/s10608-018-9979-5. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
9
A Machine Learning Approach to Understanding Patterns of Engagement With Internet-Delivered Mental Health Interventions.一种理解与互联网心理健康干预措施互动模式的机器学习方法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2010791. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10791.
10
A pragmatic randomized waitlist-controlled effectiveness and cost-effectiveness trial of digital interventions for depression and anxiety.一项针对抑郁症和焦虑症的数字干预措施的实用随机候补名单对照有效性和成本效益试验。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Jun 15;3:85. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0293-8. eCollection 2020.