Soucy Joelle N, Hadjistavropoulos Heather D, Karin Eyal, Dear Blake F, Titov Nickolai
Department of Psychology, University of Regina, Regina, Canada.
eCentreClinic, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Internet Interv. 2021 Apr 20;25:100394. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100394. eCollection 2021 Sep.
While the efficacy of therapist-guided internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (iCBT) for anxiety and depression is well-established, a significant proportion of clients show little to no improvement with this approach. Given that motivational interviewing (MI) is found to enhance face-to-face treatment of anxiety, the current trial examined potential benefits of a brief online MI intervention prior to therapist-guided iCBT. Clients applying to transdiagnostic therapist-guided iCBT in routine care were randomly assigned to receive iCBT with ( = 231) or without ( = 249) the online MI pre-treatment. Clients rated motivation at screening and pre-iCBT and anxiety and depression at pre- and post-treatment and at 13- and 25-week follow-up after enrollment. Clients in the MI plus iCBT group made more motivational statements in their emails and were enrolled in the course for a greater number of days compared to clients who received iCBT only, but did not demonstrate higher motivation after completing the MI intervention or have higher course completion. Clients in both groups, at screening and pre-iCBT, reported high levels of motivation. No statistically significant group differences were found in the rate of primary symptom change over time, with both groups reporting large reductions in anxiety and depression pre- to post-treatment (Hedges' range = 0.96-1.11). During follow-up, clients in the iCBT only group reported additional small reductions in anxiety, whereas clients in the MI plus iCBT group did not. The MI plus iCBT group also showed small increases in depression during follow-up, whereas improvement was sustained for the iCBT only group. It is concluded that online MI does not appear to enhance client outcomes when motivation at pre-treatment is high.
虽然治疗师指导的互联网认知行为疗法(iCBT)治疗焦虑症和抑郁症的疗效已得到充分证实,但相当一部分患者采用这种方法几乎没有改善。鉴于动机性访谈(MI)被发现可增强焦虑症的面对面治疗效果,当前试验研究了在治疗师指导的iCBT之前进行简短在线MI干预的潜在益处。申请常规护理中跨诊断治疗师指导的iCBT的患者被随机分配接受有( = 231)或无( = 249)在线MI预处理的iCBT。患者在筛查时和iCBT前对动机进行评分,并在治疗前和治疗后以及入组后13周和25周随访时对焦虑和抑郁进行评分。与仅接受iCBT的患者相比,MI加iCBT组的患者在电子邮件中做出了更多动机性陈述,并且参加课程的天数更多,但在完成MI干预后没有表现出更高的动机,课程完成率也没有更高。两组患者在筛查时和iCBT前均报告有较高的动机水平。随着时间的推移,两组在主要症状变化率方面未发现统计学上的显著差异,两组均报告治疗前至治疗后焦虑和抑郁大幅减轻(Hedges'范围 = 0.96 - 1.11)。在随访期间,仅接受iCBT组的患者报告焦虑进一步小幅减轻,而MI加iCBT组的患者则没有。MI加iCBT组在随访期间抑郁也略有增加,而仅接受iCBT组的改善得以持续。结论是,当治疗前动机较高时,在线MI似乎不会改善患者的治疗效果。