Schar School of Policy and Government, George Mason University, Arlington, VA, 22201 USA.
Schar School of Policy and Government, George Mason University, Arlington, VA, 22201 USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Oct;310:115308. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115308. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
During the pre-vaccine period, the success of containing the spread of COVID-19 depends upon how communities respond to non-pharmaceutical mitigation policies such as social distancing, wearing of masks, retail and dining constraints, crowd limitation, and shelter-in-place orders. Of these policies, shelter-in-place and social distancing are of central importance. By using county-level mobility data as a measure of a community's voluntary compliance with social distancing policies, this study found that counties who received strong state social distancing policy directives and who had a high pro-social character showed lower mobility on retail and recreation mobility and grocery and pharmacy mobility (better social distancing) after states reopened from shelter-in-place orders. Counties that experienced a longer duration of shelter-in-place orders showed higher mobility (less social distancing), implying that the duration of the shelter-in-place order deteriorated social distancing response after reopening. This may be because reopening sent a "safe" signal to these counties or resulted in a response to the pent-up demand inducing higher mobility. The results indicate that implementing shelter-in-place and social distancing policies to slow down the transmission of COVID-19 were not necessarily effective in motivating a county to reduce mobility voluntarily. A county's pro-social character and the duration of shelter-in-place order should be considered when designing COVID-19 mitigation policies.
在疫苗接种前时期,控制 COVID-19 传播的成功取决于社区如何应对非药物缓解政策,如社交距离、戴口罩、零售和餐饮限制、人群限制和就地庇护令。在这些政策中,就地庇护和社交距离至关重要。本研究通过使用县级流动数据作为衡量社区自愿遵守社交距离政策的指标,发现那些收到州政府强有力的社交距离政策指令且具有高度亲社会特征的县,在州政府解除就地庇护令后,其零售和娱乐活动以及杂货店和药店活动的流动性(更好的社交距离)较低。经历更长时间就地庇护令的县表现出更高的流动性(更少的社交距离),这意味着解除就地庇护令后,隔离令的持续时间恶化了社交距离的反应。这可能是因为重新开放向这些县发出了“安全”信号,或者导致了对积压需求的反应,从而导致更高的流动性。研究结果表明,实施就地庇护和社交距离政策以减缓 COVID-19 的传播,并不一定能有效地促使一个县自愿减少流动性。在制定 COVID-19 缓解政策时,应考虑县的亲社会特征和就地庇护令的持续时间。