Shin Lilian J, Margolis Seth M, Walsh Lisa C, Kwok Sylvia Y C L, Yue Xiaodong, Chan Chi-Keung, Siu Nicolson Yat-Fan, Sheldon Kennon M, Lyubomirsky Sonja
Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA USA.
Department of Health Disparities Research, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler Street, Unit 1440, Houston, TX 77030 USA.
Affect Sci. 2021 Mar 23;2(1):80-90. doi: 10.1007/s42761-020-00029-3. eCollection 2021 Mar.
Recent theory suggests that members of interdependent (collectivist) cultures prioritize in-group happiness, whereas members of independent (individualist) cultures prioritize personal happiness (Uchida et al. , (3), 223-239 Uchida et al., 2004). Thus, the well-being of friends and family may contribute more to the emotional experience of individuals with collectivist rather than individualist identities. We tested this hypothesis by asking participants to recall a kind act they had done to benefit either close others (e.g., family members) or distant others (e.g., strangers). Study 1 primed collectivist and individualist cultural identities by asking bicultural undergraduates ( = 357) from Hong Kong to recall kindnesses towards close versus distant others in both English and Chinese, while Study 2 compared university students in the USA ( = 106) and Hong Kong ( = 93). In Study 1, after being primed with the Chinese language (but not after being primed with English), participants reported significantly improved affect valence after recalling kind acts towards friends and family than after recalling kind acts towards strangers. Extending this result, in Study 2, respondents from Hong Kong (but not the USA) who recalled kind acts towards friends and family showed higher positive affect than those who recalled kind acts towards strangers. These findings suggest that people with collectivist cultural identities may have relatively more positive and less negative emotional experiences when they focus on prosocial interactions with close rather than weak ties.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42761-020-00029-3.
近期理论表明,相互依存(集体主义)文化的成员将群体内的幸福置于优先地位,而独立(个人主义)文化的成员则将个人幸福置于优先地位(内田等人,(3),223 - 239;内田等人,2004年)。因此,朋友和家人的幸福对具有集体主义而非个人主义身份的个体的情感体验可能贡献更大。我们通过要求参与者回忆他们为亲近他人(如家庭成员)或疏远他人(如陌生人)做过的一件善事来检验这一假设。研究1通过要求来自香港的双文化本科生(n = 357)用英语和中文回忆对亲近与疏远他人的善举来启动集体主义和个人主义文化身份,而研究2比较了美国(n = 106)和香港(n = 93)的大学生。在研究1中,在用中文启动(而非用英文启动)后,参与者报告称,回忆对朋友和家人的善举后,其情感效价比回忆对陌生人的善举后显著提高。扩展这一结果,在研究2中,回忆对朋友和家人的善举的香港受访者(而非美国受访者)表现出比回忆对陌生人的善举的受访者更高的积极情绪。这些发现表明,具有集体主义文化身份的人在关注与亲密而非薄弱关系的亲社会互动时,可能会有相对更积极且消极情绪更少的情感体验。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s42761 - 020 - 00029 - 3获取的补充材料。