Suppr超能文献

一项评估美国成年人恢复性睡眠的全国代表性调查。

A Nationally Representative Survey Assessing Restorative Sleep in US Adults.

作者信息

Robbins Rebecca, Quan Stuart F, Buysse Daniel, Weaver Matthew D, Walker Matthew P, Drake Christopher L, Monten Kristen, Barger Laura K, Rajaratnam Shantha M W, Roth Thomas, Czeisler Charles A

机构信息

Division of Sleep and Circadian Disorders, Department of Medicine; Brigham & Women's Hospital; Boston, MA, USA.

Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Front Sleep. 2022;1. doi: 10.3389/frsle.2022.935228. Epub 2022 Jul 21.

Abstract

Restorative sleep is a commonly used term but a poorly defined construct. Few studies have assessed restorative sleep in nationally representative samples. We convened a panel of 7 expert physicians and researchers to evaluate and enhance available measures of restorative sleep. We then developed the revised Restorative Sleep Questionnaire (REST-Q), which comprises 9 items assessing feelings resulting from the prior sleep episode, each with 5-point Likert response scales. Finally, we assessed the prevalence of high, somewhat, and low REST-Q scores in a nationally representative sample of US adults (n= 1,055) and examined the relationship of REST-Q scores with other sleep and demographic characteristics. Pairwise correlations were performed between the REST-Q scores and other self-reported sleep measures. Weighted logistic regression analyses were conducted to compare scores on the REST-Q with demographic variables. The prevalence of higher REST-Q scores (4 or 5 on the Likert scale) was 28.1% in the nationally representative sample. REST-Q scores positively correlated with sleep quality (r=0.61) and sleep duration (r=0.32), and negatively correlated with both difficulty falling asleep (r=-0.40) and falling back asleep after waking (r=-0.41). Higher restorative sleep scores (indicating more feelings of restoration upon waking) were more common among those who were: ≥60 years of age (OR=4.20, 95%CI: 1.92-9.17); widowed (OR=2.35, 95%CI:1.01-5.42), and retired (OR=2.02, 95%CI:1.30-3.14). Higher restorative sleep scores were less frequent among those who were not working (OR=0.36, 95%CI: 0.10-1.00) and living in a household with two or more persons (OR=0.51,95%CI:0.29-0.87). Our findings suggest that the REST-Q may be useful for assessing restorative sleep.

摘要

恢复性睡眠是一个常用术语,但却是一个定义模糊的概念。很少有研究在全国代表性样本中评估恢复性睡眠。我们召集了一个由7名专家医生和研究人员组成的小组,以评估和改进现有的恢复性睡眠测量方法。然后,我们开发了修订版的恢复性睡眠问卷(REST-Q),它包含9个项目,用于评估前一晚睡眠后的感受,每个项目都有5点李克特量表。最后,我们在美国成年人的全国代表性样本(n = 1055)中评估了REST-Q高分、中等分数和低分的患病率,并研究了REST-Q分数与其他睡眠和人口统计学特征之间的关系。对REST-Q分数与其他自我报告的睡眠测量方法进行了成对相关性分析。进行加权逻辑回归分析,以比较REST-Q分数与人口统计学变量。在全国代表性样本中,REST-Q高分(李克特量表上为4或5)的患病率为28.1%。REST-Q分数与睡眠质量(r = 0.61)和睡眠时间(r = 0.32)呈正相关,与入睡困难(r = -0.40)和醒来后再次入睡困难(r = -0.41)呈负相关。较高的恢复性睡眠分数(表明醒来后恢复感更强)在以下人群中更为常见:年龄≥60岁(OR = 4.20,95%CI:1.92 - 9.17);丧偶(OR = 2.35,95%CI:1.01 - 5.42),以及退休(OR = 2.02,95%CI:1.30 - 3.14)。在没有工作的人群(OR = 0.36,95%CI:0.10 - 1.00)和与两个或更多人同住的家庭中的人群(OR = 0.51,95%CI:0.29 - 0.87)中,较高的恢复性睡眠分数不太常见。我们的研究结果表明,REST-Q可能有助于评估恢复性睡眠。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a36/12713963/6ae689ee48f4/frsle-01-935228-g0001.jpg

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验