Suppr超能文献

嚼槟榔者和对照组的种植体周围临床放射学状况。

Peri-implant clinicoradiographic status among betel-quid chewers and controls.

机构信息

Department of Periodontics and Community Dentistry, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, RiyadhSaudi Arabia.

出版信息

Braz Dent J. 2022 Jul-Aug;33(4):87-96. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202204676.

Abstract

The aim of the present case-control observational study was to evaluate the peri-implant clinicoradiographic status among betel-quid chewers and controls. Self-reported betel-quid chewers and controls were included. Participants were categorized into 3 groups: Group-1: Individuals chewing betel-quid with tobacco; Group-2: Individuals chewing betel-quid without tobacco; and Group-3: Controls (individuals not using tobacco in any form). Demographic data was collected using a questionnaire. Periodontal and peri-implant clinicoradiologic parameters (plaque and gingival indices [PI and GI], probing depth [PD] and crestal bone loss/marginal bone loss [CBL/MBL]) were assessed. Clinical attachment loss (AL) around teeth was also assessed. Group comparisons were done using the one-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni Post-hoc adjustment tests. Correlation of periodontal and peri-implant inflammatory parameters with the duration of betel-quid chewing habit and duration of placement in the mouth were assessed using logistic regression analysis. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Thirty, 30 and 30 patients were included in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Full-mouth PI (P<0.01), GI (P<0.01), clinical AL (P<0.01), PD (P<0.01) and mesial and distal MBL (P<0.01) were higher in groups 1 and 2 than Group-3. Peri-implant mPI (P<0.01), mGI (P<0.01), PD (P<0.01) and MBL/CBL (P<0.01) were significantly higher in groups 1 and 2 than Group-3 with no significant difference in groups 1 and 2. Betel-quid chewing habit either with or without tobacco is a risk-factor of peri-implant soft-tissue inflammation and CBL.

摘要

本病例对照观察研究的目的是评估嚼槟榔者与对照组的种植体周围临床影像学状况。包括自我报告的嚼槟榔者和对照组。参与者分为 3 组:组 1:嚼含烟草的槟榔者;组 2:嚼不含烟草的槟榔者;组 3:对照组(任何形式均不使用烟草者)。使用问卷收集人口统计学数据。评估牙周和种植体周围临床影像学参数(菌斑和牙龈指数[PI 和 GI]、探诊深度[PD]和牙槽骨丧失/边缘骨丧失[CBL/MBL])。还评估了牙齿周围的临床附着丧失(AL)。使用单因素方差分析和 Bonferroni 事后调整检验进行组间比较。使用逻辑回归分析评估牙周和种植体周围炎症参数与嚼槟榔习惯持续时间和植入口腔内的持续时间的相关性。P<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。分别有 30 名、30 名和 30 名患者纳入组 1、组 2 和组 3。组 1 和组 2 的全口 PI(P<0.01)、GI(P<0.01)、临床 AL(P<0.01)、PD(P<0.01)和近远中 MBL(P<0.01)均高于组 3。组 1 和组 2 的种植体周围 mPI(P<0.01)、mGI(P<0.01)、PD(P<0.01)和 MBL/CBL(P<0.01)均高于组 3,但组 1 和组 2 之间无显著差异。无论是否含烟草,嚼槟榔习惯都是种植体周围软组织炎症和 CBL 的危险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a71/9645182/b30c0594aeb6/1806-4760-bdj-33-04-87-gf1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验