Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopedic Sciences, Section of Forensic.
a:1:{s:5:"en_US";s:66:"School of Law, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy";}.
Acta Biomed. 2022 Aug 31;93(4):e2022279. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i4.13477.
The Italian Supreme Court ruling no. 18901 of May 13, 2021 has determined that doctors who are opposed to abortion can refuse to perform it on grounds of conscience, but such a refusal does not exempt them from providing assistance to the woman before and after the procedure itself. The legalization of abortion should be considered within a broader strategy to put an end to underground and unsafe abortions, to raise awareness and enhance reproductive education and accessibility to contraceptive methods. The authors have set out to briefly analyze the legal and ethical complexities inherent in the effort to reconcile women's reproductive autonomy and freedom of choice with conscience-based refusal on the part of numerous healthcare professionals. Such an apparent conflict highlights the need for an ethically tenable solution that takes into account the dignity of unborn children, based on the conviction of many healthcare professionals primarily based on moral and religious tenets, that life begins at conception as well as the reproductive freedom and autonomy of women.
2021 年 5 月 13 日,意大利最高法院的第 18901 号裁决规定,反对堕胎的医生可以基于良心拒绝进行堕胎手术,但这种拒绝并不免除他们在手术前后为妇女提供协助的义务。应将堕胎合法化纳入更广泛的策略,以终止地下和不安全的堕胎,提高认识,加强生殖教育,并使避孕方法更易获得。作者旨在简要分析在努力协调妇女的生殖自主权和选择自由与众多医疗保健专业人员基于良心的拒绝之间所固有的法律和伦理复杂性。这种明显的冲突凸显了一种基于许多医疗保健专业人员的信念,即生命从受孕开始,同时考虑到未出生儿童的尊严以及妇女的生殖自由和自主权,需要找到一种在伦理上站得住脚的解决方案。