Department of Nursing, Nambu University, Gwangju, South Korea.
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 31;17(8):e0273737. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273737. eCollection 2022.
Patient safety error reporting education is instrumental in promoting a culture of safety where health-care providers learn from errors and prevent such problems from being repeated. The proposed scoping review aims to establish a comprehensive understanding of how patient error reporting education has been implemented in undergraduate nursing education and present a direction for developing a future patient safety reporting program. The proposed scoping review protocol will be conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework, following the Joanna Briggs Institute's methodology for scoping reviews. It will be reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols (PRISMA-P), and a full scoping review will be reported according to PRISMA extension for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR). In the scoping review, studies published in any language and where the participants were undergraduate nursing students were included. In addition, the search period will not be limited, and the following databases will be used to search for relevant studies: MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Excerpta Medica databases (EMBASE). Moreover, this scoping review does not include unpublished studies or gray literature. Two reviewers will independently review titles and abstracts to evaluate inclusion and exclusion criteria, and primary literature will be selected. Two reviewers will independently assess the full text of selected primary literature in detail against the study criteria.
患者安全错误报告教育对于促进安全文化至关重要,在这种文化中,医疗保健提供者可以从错误中吸取教训,并防止此类问题再次发生。本研究旨在全面了解患者错误报告教育在本科护理教育中的实施情况,并为未来的患者安全报告计划提供方向。本研究将采用 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的方法学框架进行,遵循 Joanna Briggs 研究所的范围综述方法。它将根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)进行报告,并根据范围综述扩展(PRISMA-ScR)进行全面范围综述。在范围综述中,纳入了发表在任何语言的研究,以及参与者为本科护理学生的研究。此外,检索期限将不受限制,将使用以下数据库搜索相关研究:MEDLINE、CINAHL 和 Excerpta Medica 数据库(EMBASE)。此外,本范围综述不包括未发表的研究或灰色文献。两名评审员将独立审查标题和摘要,以评估纳入和排除标准,并选择主要文献。两名评审员将独立详细评估选定的主要文献的全文,以确定其是否符合研究标准。