Suppr超能文献

消费者对远程医疗的偏好、体验和态度:来自澳大利亚的定性证据。

Consumer preferences, experiences, and attitudes towards telehealth: Qualitative evidence from Australia.

机构信息

School of Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

Consumers Health Forum of Australia, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Aug 31;17(8):e0273935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273935. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

In Australia, telehealth is not new, with several telehealth specialist services being available for those living in rural and remote communities. However, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth was not routinely available for primary care or urban specialist appointments. There has been an increased focus in the use of telehealth within primary care, and particularly general practice, but overall, there has been limited research to date to guide telehealth best-practice based on consumer experiences and preferences within these settings. We aimed to capture the consumer experience of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic, through a novel Kitchen Table Discussion (KTD) method. This increases access to a broader community consumer cohort, with consumer hosts leading discussions in a safe environment. The KTDs were conducted in May 2021, with 10 community members each hosting a group of up to 10 participants. A total of 90 participants took part from across Australia, with the majority living in major cities, although a significant proportion lived in inner and outer regional areas of Australia, or had experience living in rural, regional or remote areas. Seventy percent of participants reported using telehealth in the past. Data were analysed sequentially using thematic analysis and identified key themes: modality, convenience, access, wait time, existing relationship, communication, connectivity, cost, and privacy. Overall, the future of telehealth looks hopeful from the perspective of the consumer, but significant improvements are required to improve consumer engagement and experience. It is evident that 'one size does not fit all', with results suggesting consumers value the availability of telehealth and having choice and flexibility to use telehealth when appropriate, but do not want to see telehealth replacing face-to-face delivery. Participants tended to agree that telehealth was not a preferred method when physical examination was required but would suit certain points of the patient journey.

摘要

在澳大利亚,远程医疗并不新鲜,为居住在农村和偏远社区的人们提供了几种远程医疗专家服务。然而,在 COVID-19 大流行之前,远程医疗通常不适用于初级保健或城市专家预约。在初级保健中,特别是在全科医生中,远程医疗的使用得到了更多的关注,但迄今为止,基于消费者在这些环境中的体验和偏好,指导远程医疗最佳实践的研究有限。我们旨在通过一种新颖的 Kitchen Table Discussion (KTD) 方法来捕捉 COVID-19 大流行期间的消费者远程医疗体验。这增加了更广泛社区消费者群体的访问机会,让消费者主持人在安全的环境中主持讨论。KTD 于 2021 年 5 月进行,共有 10 名社区成员每人主持一组最多 10 名参与者。来自澳大利亚各地的 90 名参与者参加了会议,大多数参与者居住在主要城市,但也有相当一部分参与者居住在澳大利亚的内城和外城地区,或有在农村、地区或偏远地区生活的经验。70%的参与者报告过去曾使用过远程医疗。数据使用主题分析进行顺序分析,并确定了关键主题:模式、便利性、可及性、等待时间、现有关系、沟通、连接、成本和隐私。总体而言,从消费者的角度来看,远程医疗的未来看起来充满希望,但需要进行重大改进,以提高消费者的参与度和体验。显然,“一刀切”并不适合所有人,结果表明消费者重视远程医疗的可用性,并希望在适当的时候拥有选择和灵活使用远程医疗的机会,但不想看到远程医疗取代面对面的服务。参与者倾向于同意,当需要进行身体检查时,远程医疗不是首选方法,但它适合患者旅程中的某些点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/da26/9432716/033dd87d6a63/pone.0273935.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验