J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2022 Aug;70(4):613-636. doi: 10.1177/00030651221116376.
In "On Arrogance," Wilfred Bion made a remarkable claim: "the analyst who is treating an apparently neurotic patient regard a negative therapeutic response together with the appearance of scattered, unrelated references to curiosity, arrogance, and stupidity as evidence that he is in the presence of a psychological catastrophe with which he will have to deal." However Bion came to believe this, he sought grounds for it in a reading of that seriously distorts that tragedy. Since the clinical outcome in "On Arrogance" appears to be impasse, perhaps even iatrogenic injury, the text's value is perhaps best consolidated by historicizing its construction through a psychoanalytic lens. Thus, while "On Arrogance" has been canonized as prescriptive for the treatment of difficult patients, it can instead be read as the illuminating trace of a grievously difficult intrapsychic struggle, a personal reckoning that resulted in Bion's 1958 return to the battlefield at Amiens where he had "died" in the hell of combat forty years earlier. "On Arrogance" thus reflects a prodigious episode of sublimation that proved essential to Bion's lifelong development as a psychoanalytic writer and thinker.
在《论傲慢》一文中,威尔弗雷德·比昂(Wilfred Bion)提出了一个惊人的主张:“治疗明显神经症患者的分析师,应将治疗的负面反应以及患者表现出的分散的、不相关的好奇心、傲慢和愚蠢的提及,视为他正在面对的心理灾难的证据,他必须应对这一灾难。”无论比昂为何会有这样的信念,他都是从对《哈姆雷特》的一种严重扭曲的解读中找到依据的。由于《论傲慢》中的临床结果似乎是僵局,甚至可能是医源性损伤,因此,通过精神分析的视角将其构建的历史化,或许可以更好地巩固该文本的价值。因此,虽然《论傲慢》被奉为治疗困难患者的规范,但它也可以被解读为一场严重的内心挣扎的启示性痕迹,这是一种个人的清算,导致比昂在 1958 年重返亚眠的战场,他在四十年前的战斗地狱中“死亡”。因此,《论傲慢》反映了一个非凡的升华阶段,这对比昂作为精神分析作家和思想家的终身发展至关重要。