• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索个体差异作为双重N-back训练中表现变化的预测因素

Exploring Individual Differences as Predictors of Performance Change During Dual-N-Back Training.

作者信息

Ørskov Per T, Norup Anne, Beatty Erin L, Jaeggi Susanne M

机构信息

Department of Language and Communication, Faculty of Humanities, University of Southern Denmark, Slagelse, Denmark.

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

J Cogn Enhanc. 2021 Dec;5(4):480-498. doi: 10.1007/s41465-021-00216-5. Epub 2021 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1007/s41465-021-00216-5
PMID:36051628
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9431390/
Abstract

In working memory training studies, individual trajectories are known to vary considerably between participants. A better understanding of how individual differences affect training outcomes is important because it might inform the development of more effective training interventions. This study explored how measures of working memory, intelligence, sustained attention, training motivation, mindset, psychological well-being, perceived stress, and sleep quality affect initial training performance and rate of change. A total of 217 upper secondary students completed 12 weeks of adaptive dual-n-back in a classroom setting. We analyzed their self-reported training data using latent growth curve modeling. We found that working memory and intelligence predicted both, initial training performance and rate of performance change. Sustained attention and sleep quality predicted initial performance, but not the rate of change. Furthermore, we observed that participants who completed the intervention scored significantly higher on measures of working memory and intelligence and reported lower levels of perceived stress and higher levels of sleep quality at baseline compared to dropouts. In general, our study supports the magnification account with higher ability individuals starting out at a higher performance level and showing a higher rate of performance change, and moreover, being more likely to adhere to the training protocol.

摘要

在工作记忆训练研究中,已知个体轨迹在参与者之间差异很大。更好地理解个体差异如何影响训练结果很重要,因为这可能为更有效的训练干预措施的开发提供信息。本研究探讨了工作记忆、智力、持续注意力、训练动机、思维模式、心理健康、感知压力和睡眠质量等指标如何影响初始训练表现和变化率。共有217名高中生在课堂环境中完成了12周的适应性双n-back训练。我们使用潜在增长曲线模型分析了他们自我报告的训练数据。我们发现工作记忆和智力既能预测初始训练表现,也能预测表现变化率。持续注意力和睡眠质量能预测初始表现,但不能预测变化率。此外,我们观察到,与退出者相比,完成干预的参与者在工作记忆和智力指标上得分显著更高,并且在基线时报告的感知压力水平更低,睡眠质量更高。总体而言,我们的研究支持放大效应理论,即能力较高的个体从更高的表现水平开始,表现出更高的表现变化率,而且更有可能坚持训练方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c5/9431390/c92274752e62/nihms-1822636-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c5/9431390/6ea46701c88c/nihms-1822636-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c5/9431390/94daaf48aa21/nihms-1822636-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c5/9431390/350873dd0237/nihms-1822636-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c5/9431390/d6666884e0a7/nihms-1822636-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c5/9431390/c92274752e62/nihms-1822636-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c5/9431390/6ea46701c88c/nihms-1822636-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c5/9431390/94daaf48aa21/nihms-1822636-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c5/9431390/350873dd0237/nihms-1822636-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c5/9431390/d6666884e0a7/nihms-1822636-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9c5/9431390/c92274752e62/nihms-1822636-f0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring Individual Differences as Predictors of Performance Change During Dual-N-Back Training.探索个体差异作为双重N-back训练中表现变化的预测因素
J Cogn Enhanc. 2021 Dec;5(4):480-498. doi: 10.1007/s41465-021-00216-5. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
2
Predicting Working Memory Training Responsiveness in Parkinson's Disease: Both "System Hardware" and Room for Improvement Are Needed.预测帕金森病工作记忆训练的反应性:既需要“系统硬件”,也需要改进的空间。
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021 Feb;35(2):117-130. doi: 10.1177/1545968320981956.
3
Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment.老年参与者的工作记忆训练:对照组训练方案及初始智力功能评估
J Vis Exp. 2020 Sep 20(163). doi: 10.3791/60804.
4
Distributed Patterns of Functional Connectivity Predict Working Memory Performance in Novel Healthy and Memory-impaired Individuals.分布式功能连接模式可预测新健康个体和记忆障碍个体的工作记忆表现。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Feb;32(2):241-255. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01487. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
5
Transfer of working memory training to the inhibitory control of auditory distraction.工作记忆训练向听觉分心抑制控制的转移。
Psychol Res. 2021 Nov;85(8):3152-3166. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01468-0. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
6
The Mindset of Intelligence Is Not a Contributor of Placebo Effects in Working Memory Training.智力思维模式并非工作记忆训练中安慰剂效应的促成因素。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 4;12:712309. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712309. eCollection 2021.
7
A Systematic Review on Predictors of Working Memory Training Responsiveness in Healthy Older Adults: Methodological Challenges and Future Directions.健康老年人工作记忆训练反应性预测因素的系统评价:方法学挑战与未来方向
Front Aging Neurosci. 2020 Oct 14;12:575804. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.575804. eCollection 2020.
8
Exploring Working Memory Capacity and Efficiency Processes to Understand Working Memory Training Outcomes in Primary School Children.探索工作记忆容量和效率过程以理解小学生的工作记忆训练结果。
J Cogn. 2024 Feb 8;7(1):23. doi: 10.5334/joc.348. eCollection 2024.
9
No evidence of intelligence improvement after working memory training: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.工作记忆训练后无智力提高的证据:一项随机、安慰剂对照研究。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 May;142(2):359-79. doi: 10.1037/a0029082. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
10
Rethinking cognitive training: The moderating roles of emotional vulnerability and perceived cognitive impact of training in high worriers.重新思考认知训练:情绪脆弱性和训练对认知影响的感知在高焦虑者中的调节作用。
Behav Res Ther. 2021 Sep;144:103926. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2021.103926. Epub 2021 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
An experimental study on the effect of symptom expectations on mental fatigue and motivation in people with primary biliary cholangitis.症状预期对原发性胆汁性胆管炎患者心理疲劳和动机影响的实验研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 26;15(1):31464. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16191-2.
2
Log File Times as Indicators of Structured Figural Matrix Processing.作为结构化图形矩阵处理指标的日志文件时间
J Intell. 2025 May 28;13(6):63. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence13060063.
3
EngAge - A metacognitive intervention to supplement working memory training: A feasibility study in older adults.

本文引用的文献

1
Divergent Research Methods Limit Understanding of Working Memory Training.不同的研究方法限制了对工作记忆训练的理解。
J Cogn Enhanc. 2020 Mar;4(1):100-120. doi: 10.1007/s41465-019-00134-7. Epub 2019 May 9.
2
Predicting Late Adolescent Anxiety From Early Adolescent Environmental Stress Exposure: Cognitive Control as Mediator.从青少年早期环境压力暴露预测青少年晚期焦虑:认知控制作为中介因素
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 11;11:1838. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01838. eCollection 2020.
3
The Hype Cycle of Working Memory Training.工作记忆训练的技术成熟度曲线
EngAge——一种补充工作记忆训练的元认知干预措施:针对老年人的可行性研究。
Aging Brain. 2023 Jul 7;4:100083. doi: 10.1016/j.nbas.2023.100083. eCollection 2023.
4
Unicorn, Hare, or Tortoise? Using Machine Learning to Predict Working Memory Training Performance.独角兽、野兔还是乌龟?利用机器学习预测工作记忆训练表现。
J Cogn. 2023 Sep 4;6(1):53. doi: 10.5334/joc.319. eCollection 2023.
5
Investigating the Role of Individual Differences in Adherence to Cognitive Training.探究个体差异在认知训练依从性中的作用。
J Cogn. 2023 Aug 22;6(1):48. doi: 10.5334/joc.315. eCollection 2023.
6
Cognitive training enhances growth mindset in children through plasticity of cortico-striatal circuits.认知训练通过皮质-纹状体回路的可塑性增强儿童的成长型思维模式。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2022 Nov 12;7(1):30. doi: 10.1038/s41539-022-00146-7.
7
The effect of working memory training on situation awareness in a flight simulator.工作记忆训练对飞行模拟器中态势感知的影响。
Cogn Technol Work. 2022;24(4):667-674. doi: 10.1007/s10111-022-00707-1. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
8
Editorial: Five Years of Journal of Cognitive Enhancement.社论:《认知增强杂志》创刊五周年
J Cogn Enhanc. 2022;6(1):1-2. doi: 10.1007/s41465-022-00239-6. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2019 Oct;28(5):423-429. doi: 10.1177/0963721419848668. Epub 2019 May 16.
4
The Influence of Individual Differences in Cognitive Ability on Working Memory Training Gains.认知能力个体差异对工作记忆训练效果的影响。
J Cogn Enhanc. 2019 Jun;3(2):174-185. doi: 10.1007/s41465-018-0111-2. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
5
Investigating the Effects of Spacing on Working Memory Training Outcome: A Randomized, Controlled, Multisite Trial in Older Adults.探究间隔对工作记忆训练效果的影响:一项针对老年人的随机、对照、多中心试验。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Jun 2;75(6):1181-1192. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbz090.
6
Working memory training involves learning new skills.工作记忆训练涉及学习新技能。
J Mem Lang. 2016 Sep 12;105:19-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
7
Working Memory Capacity as a Predictor of Cognitive Training Efficacy in the Elderly Population.工作记忆容量作为老年人群认知训练效果的预测指标
Front Aging Neurosci. 2019 May 31;11:126. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00126. eCollection 2019.
8
Poor Sleep Quality and Compromised Visual Working Memory Capacity.睡眠质量差与视觉工作记忆容量受损。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2019 Jul;25(6):583-594. doi: 10.1017/S1355617719000183. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
9
Cumulative mild partial sleep deprivation negatively impacts working memory capacity but not sustained attention, response inhibition, or decision making: a randomized controlled trial.累积性轻度部分睡眠剥夺会对工作记忆容量产生负面影响,但不会影响持续注意力、反应抑制或决策制定:一项随机对照试验。
Sleep Health. 2019 Feb;5(1):101-108. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
10
Stress and executive control: Mechanisms, moderators, and malleability.压力与执行控制:机制、调节因素和可塑化。
Brain Cogn. 2019 Jul;133:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Nov 2.