Suppr超能文献

社区动员干预措施以提高南非艾滋病毒检测、治疗关联和治疗保留率的研究:一项整群随机对照试验。

A community mobilisation intervention to improve engagement in HIV testing, linkage to care, and retention in care in South Africa: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA USA; MRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

MRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Lancet HIV. 2022 Sep;9(9):e617-e626. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(22)00192-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Community mobilisation, engaging communities in a process to collectively enact change, could improve HIV testing and care engagement. In South Africa, current rates fall below those needed for epidemic control. We assessed whether community mobilisation increased HIV testing, linkage to care, and retention in care over time in intervention relative to control communities.

METHODS

We conducted a cluster-randomised controlled trial in villages in the Agincourt sub-district of the rural Mpumalanga Province in South Africa. 15 villages were randomly assigned to either a community mobilisation intervention engaging residents to address social barriers to HIV testing and treatment (intervention arm) or to a control arm using balanced randomisation. Villages were eligible if they had been fully enumerated in 2014, had not been included in previous mobilisation activities, and included over 500 permanent adult residents aged 18-49 years. Primary outcomes included quarterly rates of HIV testing, linkage to care, and retention in care documented from health facility records among residents of the intervention and control communities over the 3-year study period. Intention-to-treat analyses employed generalised estimating equations stratified by sex. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02197793.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 1, 2015, and July 31, 2018, residents in eight intervention communities (n=20 544 residents) and seven control communities (n=17 848) contributed data; 92 residents contributed to both arms. Among men, HIV testing increased quarterly by 12·1% (relative change [RC] 1·121, 95% CI 1·099 to 1·143, p<0·0001) in the intervention communities and 9·5% (1·095, 1·075 to 1·114, p=0·011) in the control communities; although increases in testing were greater in the intervention villages, differences did not reach significance (exponentiated interaction coefficient 1·024, 95% CI 0·997 to 1·052, p=0·078). Among women, HIV testing increased quarterly by 10·6% (RC 1·106, 95% CI 1·097 to 1·114, p<0·0001) in the intervention communities and 9·3% (1·093, 1·084 to 1·102, p=0·053) in the control communities; increases were greater in intervention communities (exponentiated interaction coefficient 1·012, 95% CI 1·001 to 1·023, p=0·043). Quarterly linkage increased significantly among women in the intervention communities (RC 1·013, 95% CI 1·002 to 1·023, p=0·018) only. Quarterly linkage fell among men in both arms, but decreased significantly among men in the control communities (0·977, 0·954 to 1·002, p=0·043). Quarterly retention fell among women in both arms; however, reductions were tempered among women in the intervention communities (exponentiated interaction coefficient 1·003, 95% CI <1·000 to 1·006, p=0·062). Retention fell significantly among men in both arms with difference in rates of decline.

INTERPRETATION

Community mobilisation was associated with modest improvements in select trial outcomes. The sum of these incremental, quarterly improvements achieved by addressing social barriers to HIV care engagement can impact epidemic control. However, achieving optimal impacts will probably require integrated efforts addressing both social barriers through community mobilisation and provision of improved service delivery.

FUNDING

US National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health, and United States President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief through Right to Care and Project SOAR.

摘要

背景

社区动员是让社区参与集体变革的过程,它可以提高艾滋病毒检测和护理的参与度。在南非,目前的检测率低于控制疫情所需的水平。我们评估了社区动员是否能随着时间的推移,在干预组相对于对照组中增加艾滋病毒检测、与护理的联系和护理的保留率。

方法

我们在南非姆普马兰加省农村地区的阿格因库尔区的村庄进行了一项集群随机对照试验。15 个村庄被随机分配到社区动员干预组(参与居民解决艾滋病毒检测和治疗的社会障碍)或对照组(使用平衡随机化)。有资格参与的村庄必须在 2014 年被全面统计,以前没有参与过动员活动,并且包括 500 名以上 18-49 岁的常住成年居民。主要结果包括从干预和对照组居民的健康设施记录中记录的每季度艾滋病毒检测、与护理的联系和护理保留率,研究期间为 3 年。意向治疗分析采用性别分层的广义估计方程。这项试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT02197793。

结果

2015 年 8 月 1 日至 2018 年 7 月 31 日期间,8 个干预社区(n=20544 名居民)和 7 个对照社区(n=17848 名居民)的居民提供了数据;92 名居民同时参与了两个组。在男性中,干预组的艾滋病毒检测每季度增加 12.1%(相对变化 [RC] 1.121,95%CI 1.099 至 1.143,p<0.0001),对照组增加 9.5%(1.095,1.075 至 1.114,p=0.011);尽管干预组的检测增加幅度更大,但差异没有达到显著水平(指数化交互系数 1.024,95%CI 0.997 至 1.052,p=0.078)。在女性中,干预组的艾滋病毒检测每季度增加 10.6%(RC 1.106,95%CI 1.097 至 1.114,p<0.0001),对照组增加 9.3%(1.093,1.084 至 1.102,p=0.053);干预组的增幅更大(指数化交互系数 1.012,95%CI 1.001 至 1.023,p=0.043)。只有女性在干预组中的季度联系显著增加(RC 1.013,95%CI 1.002 至 1.023,p=0.018)。男性在两个组中的季度联系都有所下降,但对照组的男性下降更为显著(0.977,0.954 至 1.002,p=0.043)。女性在两个组中的季度保留率都有所下降;然而,在干预组中,这一比例有所缓和(指数化交互系数 1.003,95%CI <1.000 至 1.006,p=0.062)。男性在两个组中的保留率都有所下降,而且下降幅度不同。

解释

社区动员与某些试验结果的适度改善有关。通过解决艾滋病毒护理参与的社会障碍而实现的这些增量、季度改善的总和可以影响疫情的控制。然而,要达到最佳效果,可能需要综合努力,通过社区动员解决社会障碍,并提供改进的服务交付。

资金

美国国立卫生研究院、美国国立心理健康研究所和美国总统艾滋病紧急救援计划通过正确关爱和 SOAR 项目提供资金。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验