Rainford Louise, Santos Joana, Alves Francisco, Figueiredo João Paulo, Hoeschen Christoph, Damilakis John, Frija Guy, Andersson Jonas, McNulty Jonathan, Foley Shane, Bacher Klaus, Nestle Ursula, Hierath Monika, Paulo Graciano
Radiography and Diagnostic Imaging, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Room A201, UCD Health Science Centre, Belfield Campus, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra, ESTESC - Coimbra Health School, Medical Imaging and Radiotherapy, Coimbra, Portugal.
Insights Imaging. 2022 Sep 4;13(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01271-y.
A Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis was performed to understand the status quo of education and training in radiation protection (RP) and to develop a coordinated European approach to RP training needs based on stakeholder consensus and existing activities in the field. Fourteen team members represented six European professional societies, one European voluntary organisation, two international healthcare organisations and five professions, namely: Medical Physicists; Nuclear Medicine Physicians; Radiologists; Radiation Oncologists and Radiographers. Four subgroups analysed the "Strengths", "Weaknesses", "Opportunities" and "Threats" related to E&T in RP developed under previous European Union (EU) programmes and on the Guidelines on Radiation Protection Education and Training of Medical Professionals in the EU.
Consensus agreement identified four themes for strengths and opportunities, namely: (1) existing structures and training recommendations; (2) RP training needs assessment and education & training (E&T) model(s) development; (3) E&T dissemination, harmonisation, and accreditation; (4) financial supports. Weaknesses and Threats analysis identified two themes: (1) awareness and prioritisation at a national/global level and (2) awareness and prioritisation by healthcare professional groups and researchers.
A lack of effective implementation of RP principles in daily practice was identified. EuRnR strategic planning needs to consider processes at European, national and local levels. Success is dependent upon efficient governance structures and expert leadership. Financial support is required to allow the stakeholder professional agencies to have sufficient resources to achieve a pan European radiation protection training network which is sustainable and accredited across multiple national domains.
开展了优势、劣势、机会和威胁分析,以了解辐射防护(RP)教育与培训的现状,并基于利益相关者的共识和该领域的现有活动,制定欧洲协调一致的RP培训需求方法。14名团队成员代表了6个欧洲专业协会、1个欧洲志愿组织、2个国际医疗保健组织以及5个专业,即:医学物理学家;核医学医师;放射科医生;放射肿瘤学家和放射技师。四个子小组分析了与先前欧盟计划下制定的RP教育与培训以及欧盟医学专业人员辐射防护教育与培训指南相关的“优势”“劣势”“机会”和“威胁”。
共识确定了优势和机会的四个主题,即:(1)现有结构和培训建议;(2)RP培训需求评估和教育与培训(E&T)模式;(3)E&T传播、协调和认证;(4)财政支持。劣势和威胁分析确定了两个主题:(1)国家/全球层面的意识和优先级;(2)医疗保健专业团体和研究人员的意识和优先级。
发现在日常实践中缺乏对RP原则的有效实施。欧洲辐射防护网络(EuRnR)的战略规划需要考虑欧洲、国家和地方层面的流程。成功取决于有效的治理结构和专家领导。需要财政支持,以使利益相关者专业机构有足够资源建立一个泛欧洲辐射防护培训网络,该网络在多个国家领域具有可持续性并获得认证。