Suppr超能文献

简单有效?在自我指导写作练习中,聚焦解决方案与聚焦问题的指导问题的不同效果。

Simply effective? The differential effects of solution-focused and problem-focused coaching questions in a self-coaching writing exercise.

作者信息

Solms Lara, Koen Jessie, van Vianen Annelies E M, Theeboom Tim, Beersma Bianca, de Pagter Anne P J, de Hoog Matthijs

机构信息

Department of Work and Organizational Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Pediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 18;13:895439. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.895439. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Coaching is a systematic and goal-oriented one-on-one intervention by a coach aimed to guide clients in their professional and personal development. Previous research on coaching has demonstrated effects on a number of positive outcomes, including well-being and performance, yet little is known about the processes that underlie these outcomes, such as the type of questions coaches use. Here, we focus on three different types of coaching questions, and aim to uncover their immediate and sustained effects for affect, self-efficacy, and goal-directed outcomes, using a between-subjects experiment. One hundred and eighty-three medical residents and PhD students from various medical centers and healthcare organizations in the Netherlands were recruited to participate in a self-coaching writing exercise, where they followed written instructions rather than interacting with a real coach. All participants were randomly allocated to one of three conditions: either one of two solution-focused coaching conditions (i.e., the success or miracle condition) or a problem-focused coaching condition. Self-report questionnaires were used to measure key outcomes of coaching, that is positive and negative affect, self-efficacy, goal orientation, action planning (i.e., quantity and quality) and goal attainment. Two follow-up measurements assessed if the effects of the self-coaching exercise led to problem-solving actions within an initial follow-up period of 14 days and a subsequent follow-up period of 10 days. Findings showed that participants experienced more positive affect, less negative affect, and higher approach goal orientation after the solution-focused coaching exercise compared to the problem-focused coaching exercise. In all conditions, goal attainment increased as a consequence of the self-coaching intervention. We discuss the implications of our findings for the science and practice of contemporary coaching.

摘要

教练辅导是教练进行的一种系统的、目标导向的一对一干预,旨在指导客户在其职业和个人发展方面取得进步。先前关于教练辅导的研究已经证明了其对一系列积极成果的影响,包括幸福感和绩效,但对于这些成果背后的过程,比如教练所使用问题的类型,我们却知之甚少。在此,我们聚焦于三种不同类型的教练辅导问题,并旨在通过一项被试间实验揭示它们对情感、自我效能感以及目标导向成果的即时和持续影响。我们招募了来自荷兰各医疗中心和医疗保健组织的183名住院医生和博士生参与一项自我教练写作练习,在该练习中他们遵循书面指导,而非与真正的教练互动。所有参与者被随机分配到三种条件之一:两种聚焦解决方案的教练辅导条件之一(即成功条件或奇迹条件)或一种聚焦问题的教练辅导条件。我们使用自我报告问卷来测量教练辅导的关键成果,即积极和消极情绪、自我效能感、目标导向、行动计划(即数量和质量)以及目标达成情况。两项后续测量评估了自我教练练习的效果是否在最初14天的随访期和随后10天的随访期内导致了解决问题的行动。研究结果表明,与聚焦问题的教练辅导练习相比,聚焦解决方案的教练辅导练习后,参与者体验到了更多的积极情绪、更少的消极情绪以及更高的趋近目标导向。在所有条件下,自我教练干预都使目标达成情况有所增加。我们讨论了我们的研究结果对当代教练辅导科学与实践的启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0388/9435469/3a925c6be682/fpsyg-13-895439-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验