Yang Yi, Li Xiang
Business School, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 28;12:613871. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.613871. eCollection 2021.
Although the relationship between stressors and thriving at work has been established, the linkage between them is still in the early stages of theory development. This study proposed a two-path model, based on Lepine's stressors-performance model, to analyze the effects of the stressors on the thriving at work. Two complementary mediating paths were proposed, i.e., affective strain (positive affect) and motivation (self-efficacy), which were explained using affective events theory and expectancy theory, respectively. Based on the empirical data from 233 employees, the results show that challenge stressors could enhance employees' positive affect and self-efficacy, thus leading to thriving at work; on the contrary, hindrance stressors would result in negative influences. In addition, it is also found that the effect of affective path tend to be greater than that of motivation path, which could provide a practical guide for organizations to effectively apply stress management and to promote employees thriving at work.
尽管压力源与工作中的蓬勃发展之间的关系已经确立,但它们之间的联系仍处于理论发展的早期阶段。本研究基于勒平的压力源-绩效模型提出了一个双路径模型,以分析压力源对工作中蓬勃发展的影响。提出了两条互补的中介路径,即情感应激(积极情感)和动机(自我效能感),分别用情感事件理论和期望理论进行解释。基于233名员工的实证数据,结果表明,挑战性压力源可以增强员工的积极情感和自我效能感,从而导致工作中的蓬勃发展;相反,阻碍性压力源会产生负面影响。此外,还发现情感路径的影响往往大于动机路径,这可以为组织有效应用压力管理和促进员工在工作中蓬勃发展提供实践指导。