Wang Yidan, Yang Qiuxing, Liu Jia, Shen Xiying, Tai Guomei, Gu Hongmei
Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong University, Nantong, China.
Cancer Research Center Nantong, Nantong Tumor Hospital, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China.
J Oncol. 2022 Aug 25;2022:4033863. doi: 10.1155/2022/4033863. eCollection 2022.
The number of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors is gradually increasing; this study aimed to comprehensively and systematically evaluate the impact of PD-1 inhibitors as second-line therapy for terminal or metastatic esophageal cancer (EC) on patient survival and the occurrence of adverse events. Suitable randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Moreover, we searched for conference abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) to compare the comprehensive curative effects of PD-1 inhibitors or single-agent therapy in terminal or metastatic EC. The primary outcome indicators were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were the secondary outcome indicators. We compared the previously mentioned indicators of the two treatment modalities using Stata software (version 12.0). We compared the long-term survival rates of both treatment groups and analyzed the possible factors affecting OS. We selected five RCTs with 2197 patients as study subjects. Compared with conventional single-agent chemotherapy, PD-1 inhibitors greatly improved the patients' OS (HR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.70-0.85, < 0.001), but PFS (HR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.77-1.12, =0.431) and DCR (RR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.71-1.22, =0.609) were not greatly improved. Moreover, PD-1 inhibitors improved ORR (RR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.16-2.89, =0.009) and decreased TRAEs (RR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.61-0.95, < 0.001) and serious TRAEs (RR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.32-0.49, < 0.001). Further analysis demonstrated that OS was affected by age, sex, region, smoking history, and the number of organ and lymph node metastases. Compared with the traditional single chemotherapy drugs, PD-1 inhibitors can achieve higher OS and ORR, fewer and more serious TRAEs, and better efficacy and safety for second-line therapy of terminal or metastatic EC.
程序性细胞死亡蛋白1(PD-1)抑制剂的数量正在逐渐增加;本研究旨在全面、系统地评估PD-1抑制剂作为晚期或转移性食管癌(EC)二线治疗对患者生存及不良事件发生情况的影响。从PubMed、Web of Science、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库中检索合适的随机对照试验(RCT)。此外,我们还检索了美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)和欧洲医学肿瘤学会(ESMO)的会议摘要,以比较PD-1抑制剂或单药治疗在晚期或转移性EC中的综合疗效。主要结局指标为总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)。治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)为次要结局指标。我们使用Stata软件(版本12.0)比较两种治疗方式的上述指标。我们比较了两个治疗组的长期生存率,并分析了影响OS的可能因素。我们选择了5项RCT,共2197例患者作为研究对象。与传统单药化疗相比,PD-1抑制剂显著改善了患者的OS(HR = 0.77,95%CI 0.70 - 0.85,P < 0.001),但PFS(HR = 0.93,95%CI 0.77 - 1.12,P = 0.431)和DCR(RR = 0.93,95%CI 0.71 - 1.22,P = 0.609)改善不明显。此外,PD-1抑制剂提高了ORR(RR = 1.83,95%CI 1.16 - 2.89,P = 0.009),并降低了TRAEs(RR = 0.76,95%CI 0.61 - 0.95,P < 0.001)和严重TRAEs(RR = 0.40,95%CI 0.32 - 0.49,P < 0.001)。进一步分析表明,OS受年龄、性别、地区、吸烟史以及器官和淋巴结转移数量的影响。与传统单化疗药物相比,PD-1抑制剂在晚期或转移性EC的二线治疗中可实现更高的OS和ORR,更少及更轻的TRAEs,疗效和安全性更佳。