van der Zee Ivar T, Vreman Rick A, Liberti Lawrence, Garza Mario Alanis
Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Temple University School of Pharmacy Philadelphia United States of America Temple University School of Pharmacy, Philadelphia, United States of America.
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2022 Aug 30;46:e115. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2022.115. eCollection 2022.
To map the timing and nature of regulatory reliance pathways used to authorize COVID-19 vaccines in Latin America.
An observational study was conducted assessing the characteristics of all COVID-19 vaccine authorizations in Latin America. For every authorization it was determined whether reliance was used in the authorization process. Subgroups of reference national regulatory authorities (NRAs) and non-reference NRAs were compared.
56 authorizations of 10 different COVID-19 vaccines were identified in 18 countries, of which 25 (44.6%) used reliance and 12 (21.4%) did not. For the remaining 19 (33.0%) it was not possible to determine whether reliance was used. Reference agencies used reliance less often (40% of authorizations with a known pathway) compared to non-reference agencies (100%). The median review time was just 15 days and does not meaningfully differ between reliance and non-reliance authorizations.
This study demonstrated that for these vaccines, despite reliance pathways being associated with numerous rapid authorizations, independent authorization review times were not considerably longer than reliance reviews; reliance pathways were not a prerequisite for rapid authorization. Nevertheless, reliance pathways provided rapid authorizations in response to the COVID-19 emergency.
梳理拉丁美洲批准新冠疫苗所采用的监管依赖途径的时间和性质。
开展一项观察性研究,评估拉丁美洲所有新冠疫苗批准的特征。对于每一项批准,确定在批准过程中是否采用了依赖途径。对参考国家监管机构(NRA)和非参考NRA的亚组进行了比较。
在18个国家确定了10种不同新冠疫苗的56项批准,其中25项(44.6%)采用了依赖途径,12项(21.4%)未采用。其余19项(33.0%)无法确定是否采用了依赖途径。与非参考机构(100%)相比,参考机构较少使用依赖途径(已知途径的批准中有40%)。中位审查时间仅为15天,采用依赖途径和未采用依赖途径的批准之间没有显著差异。
本研究表明,对于这些疫苗,尽管依赖途径与众多快速批准相关,但独立批准审查时间并不比依赖审查长得多;依赖途径不是快速批准的先决条件。然而,依赖途径为应对新冠疫情紧急情况提供了快速批准。