• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于接受血液透析患者死亡风险评估的机器学习方法

Machine learning approaches for the mortality risk assessment of patients undergoing hemodialysis.

作者信息

Yang Cheng-Hong, Chen Yin-Syuan, Moi Sin-Hua, Chen Jin-Bor, Wang Lin, Chuang Li-Yeh

机构信息

Department of Information Management, Tainan University of Technology, Tainan.

Department of Electronic Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, Kaohsiung.

出版信息

Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2022 Aug 30;13:20406223221119617. doi: 10.1177/20406223221119617. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1177/20406223221119617
PMID:36062293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9434675/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Mortality is a major primary endpoint for long-term hemodialysis (HD) patients. The clinical status of HD patients generally relies on longitudinal clinical observations such as monthly laboratory examinations and physical examinations.

METHODS

A total of 829 HD patients who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. All patients were tracked from January 2009 to December 2013. Taken together, this study performed full-adjusted-Cox proportional hazards (CoxPH), stepwise-CoxPH, random survival forest (RSF)-CoxPH, and whale optimization algorithm (WOA)-CoxPH model for the all-cause mortality risk assessment in HD patients. The model performance between proposed selections of CoxPH models were evaluated using concordance index.

RESULTS

The WOA-CoxPH model obtained the highest concordance index compared with RSF-CoxPH and typical selection CoxPH model. The eight significant parameters obtained from the WOA-CoxPH model, including age, diabetes mellitus (DM), hemoglobin (Hb), albumin, creatinine (Cr), potassium (K), Kt/V, and cardiothoracic ratio, have also showed significant survival difference between low- and high-risk characteristics in single-factor analysis. By integrating the risk characteristics of each single factor, patients who obtained seven or more risk characteristics of eight selected parameters were dichotomized as high-risk subgroup, and remaining is considered as low-risk subgroup. The integrated low- and high-risk subgroup showed greater discrepancy compared with each single risk factor selected by WOA-CoxPH model.

CONCLUSION

The study findings revealed WOA-CoxPH model could provide better risk assessment performance compared with RSF-CoxPH and typical selection CoxPH model in the HD patients. In summary, patients who had seven or more risk characteristics of eight selected parameters were at potentially increased risk of all-cause mortality in HD population.

摘要

引言

死亡率是长期血液透析(HD)患者的主要主要终点。HD患者的临床状况通常依赖于纵向临床观察,如每月的实验室检查和体格检查。

方法

对829例符合纳入标准的HD患者进行分析。所有患者从2009年1月至2013年12月进行跟踪。本研究共进行了全调整Cox比例风险(CoxPH)、逐步CoxPH、随机生存森林(RSF)-CoxPH和鲸鱼优化算法(WOA)-CoxPH模型,用于评估HD患者的全因死亡风险。使用一致性指数评估所提出的CoxPH模型选择之间的模型性能。

结果

与RSF-CoxPH和典型选择的CoxPH模型相比,WOA-CoxPH模型获得了最高的一致性指数。从WOA-CoxPH模型获得的八个显著参数,包括年龄、糖尿病(DM)、血红蛋白(Hb)、白蛋白、肌酐(Cr)、钾(K)、Kt/V和心胸比,在单因素分析中也显示出低风险和高风险特征之间的显著生存差异。通过整合每个单因素的风险特征,将获得八个选定参数中七个或更多风险特征的患者分为高风险亚组,其余患者视为低风险亚组。与WOA-CoxPH模型选择的每个单一风险因素相比,整合后的低风险和高风险亚组显示出更大的差异。

结论

研究结果表明,与RSF-CoxPH和典型选择的CoxPH模型相比,WOA-CoxPH模型在HD患者中可以提供更好的风险评估性能。总之,在HD人群中,具有八个选定参数中七个或更多风险特征的患者全因死亡风险可能增加。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c758/9434675/cec72b7c4cf7/10.1177_20406223221119617-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c758/9434675/cec72b7c4cf7/10.1177_20406223221119617-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c758/9434675/cec72b7c4cf7/10.1177_20406223221119617-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine learning approaches for the mortality risk assessment of patients undergoing hemodialysis.用于接受血液透析患者死亡风险评估的机器学习方法
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2022 Aug 30;13:20406223221119617. doi: 10.1177/20406223221119617. eCollection 2022.
2
Improved nonparametric survival prediction using CoxPH, Random Survival Forest & DeepHit Neural Network.基于 CoxPH、随机生存森林和 DeepHit 神经网络的改进非参数生存预测。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 May 7;24(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02525-z.
3
Overall mortality risk analysis for rectal cancer using deep learning-based fuzzy systems.基于深度学习的模糊系统分析直肠癌总体死亡率。
Comput Biol Med. 2023 May;157:106706. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106706. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
4
Application of deep learning to predict the low serum albumin in new hemodialysis patients.深度学习在预测新血液透析患者低血清白蛋白中的应用。
Nutr Metab (Lond). 2023 Apr 24;20(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12986-023-00746-z.
5
The role of deep learning-based survival model in improving survival prediction of patients with glioblastoma.深度学习生存模型在提高胶质母细胞瘤患者生存预测中的作用。
Cancer Med. 2021 Oct;10(20):7048-7059. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4230. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
6
Deep neural survival networks for cardiovascular risk prediction: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).深度学习生存网络在心血管风险预测中的应用:动脉粥样硬化多民族研究(MESA)。
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Dec;139:104983. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104983. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
7
Comparison of deep learning-based recurrence-free survival with random survival forest and Cox proportional hazard models in Stage-I NSCLC patients.基于深度学习的无复发生存率与随机生存森林和Cox比例风险模型在I期非小细胞肺癌患者中的比较。
Cancer Med. 2023 Sep;12(18):19272-19278. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6479. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
8
Risk factors associated with major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events following percutaneous coronary intervention: a 10-year follow-up comparing random survival forest and Cox proportional-hazards model.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后主要不良心脑血管事件的相关危险因素:一项比较随机生存森林模型和Cox比例风险模型的10年随访研究
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Jan 18;21(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01834-1.
9
Interdialytic weight gain and survival in hemodialysis patients: effects of duration of ESRD and diabetes mellitus.血液透析患者透析间期体重增加与生存情况:终末期肾病病程及糖尿病的影响
Kidney Int. 2000 Mar;57(3):1141-51. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00941.x.
10
Charlson Comorbidity Index is a predictor of outcomes in incident hemodialysis patients and correlates with phase angle and hospitalization.查尔森合并症指数是新发血液透析患者预后的一个预测指标,且与相位角和住院情况相关。
Int J Artif Organs. 2004 Apr;27(4):330-6. doi: 10.1177/039139880402700409.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in Nephrology: Clinical Applications and Challenges.肾脏病学中的人工智能:临床应用与挑战
Kidney Med. 2024 Nov 12;7(1):100927. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100927. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Predicting early mortality in hemodialysis patients: a deep learning approach using a nationwide prospective cohort in South Korea.利用韩国全国前瞻性队列研究对血液透析患者进行早期死亡预测:深度学习方法。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 29;14(1):29658. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80900-6.
3
Data-driven, two-stage machine learning algorithm-based prediction scheme for assessing 1-year and 3-year mortality risk in chronic hemodialysis patients.

本文引用的文献

1
The Nitty-Gritties of Kt/V Calculations in Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis.血液透析和腹膜透析中Kt/V计算的细节
Indian J Nephrol. 2021 Mar-Apr;31(2):97-110. doi: 10.4103/ijn.IJN_245_19. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
2
Predicting mortality in hemodialysis patients using machine learning analysis.使用机器学习分析预测血液透析患者的死亡率。
Clin Kidney J. 2020 Aug 11;14(5):1388-1395. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa126. eCollection 2021 May.
3
Machine learning approach in mortality rate prediction for hemodialysis patients.机器学习在血液透析患者死亡率预测中的应用。
基于数据驱动的两阶段机器学习算法的预测方案,用于评估慢性血液透析患者的 1 年和 3 年死亡率风险。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 5;13(1):21453. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-48905-9.
4
Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting prognosis and guiding individualized postoperative chemotherapy: A real-world study of distal cholangiocarcinoma.用于预测预后和指导个体化术后化疗的机器学习模型的开发与验证:一项远端胆管癌的真实世界研究
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 15;13:1106029. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1106029. eCollection 2023.
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2022 Jan;25(1):111-122. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2021.1937611. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
4
Potassium Trajectories prior to Dialysis and Mortality following Dialysis Initiation in Patients with Advanced CKD.晚期慢性肾脏病患者透析前的钾轨迹与透析启动后的死亡率。
Nephron. 2021;145(3):265-274. doi: 10.1159/000514294. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
5
A Comparison Study of Machine Learning (Random Survival Forest) and Classic Statistic (Cox Proportional Hazards) for Predicting Progression in High-Grade Glioma after Proton and Carbon Ion Radiotherapy.机器学习(随机生存森林)与经典统计学(Cox比例风险模型)预测质子和碳离子放疗后高级别胶质瘤进展的比较研究
Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 30;10:551420. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.551420. eCollection 2020.
6
Predictors of mortality among hemodialysis patients in Hamadan province using random survival forests.随机生存森林法预测伊朗哈马丹省血液透析患者的死亡率。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2020 Oct 6;61(3):E482-E488. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2020.61.3.1421. eCollection 2020 Sep.
7
Mutual Interaction of Clinical Factors and Specific microRNAs to Predict Mild Cognitive Impairment in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis.临床因素与特定 microRNAs 的相互作用可预测接受血液透析患者的轻度认知障碍。
Cells. 2020 Oct 15;9(10):2303. doi: 10.3390/cells9102303.
8
Higher-order clinical risk factor interaction analysis for overall mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients.维持性血液透析患者全因死亡率的高阶临床危险因素交互作用分析
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2020 Sep 29;11:2040622320949060. doi: 10.1177/2040622320949060. eCollection 2020.
9
Comparison of the Tree-Based Machine Learning Algorithms to Cox Regression in Predicting the Survival of Oral and Pharyngeal Cancers: Analyses Based on SEER Database.基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库分析:基于树的机器学习算法与Cox回归在预测口腔和咽癌生存率方面的比较
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Sep 29;12(10):2802. doi: 10.3390/cancers12102802.
10
Patient-Centred Outcomes in Anaemia and Renal Disease: A Systematic Review.贫血与肾脏疾病中的以患者为中心的结局:一项系统综述。
Kidney Dis (Basel). 2020 Mar;6(2):74-84. doi: 10.1159/000502208. Epub 2019 Nov 19.