Kim Jong Ho, Kim Haewon, Yoo Kookhyun, Hwang Sung Mi, Lim So Young, Lee Jae Jun, Kwon Young Suk
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hallym University Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, 77 Sakju-ro, Chuncheon, 24253, South Korea.
Institute of New Frontier Research Team, Hallym University, Chuncheon, South Korea.
Perioper Med (Lond). 2022 Sep 6;11(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13741-022-00264-1.
The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System is commonly used for preoperative assessment. Patient physical status before surgery can play an important role in postoperative nausea and vomiting. However, the relationship between the physical status classification and postoperative nausea and vomiting has not been well defined.
Adults aged ≥ 18 years who underwent procedures under anesthesia between 2015 and 2020 were included in the study. We analyzed the relationship of postoperative nausea and vomiting with physical status classification score using propensity score matching and Cox hazard regression. Differences in intraoperative use of vasopressor and inotropes and invasive monitoring were investigated according to the classification.
A total of 163,500 patients were included in the study. After matching, classification 1 versus 2 included 43,400 patients; 1 versus ≤ 3, 13,287 patients; 2 versus ≤ 3, 23,530 patients (absolute standardized difference, 0-0.06). Patients with physical status classification ≤ 3 had a significantly lower postoperative nausea and vomiting risk than those with classification 1-2 (physical status classification 1 vs. ≤ 3, hazard ratio 0.76 [0.71-0.82], P < 0.001; 2 versus ≤ 3, hazard ratio 0.86 [0.82-0.91], P < 0.001). Intraoperative use of vasopressor or inotrope and invasive monitoring were noted more in the high physical status classification than the low physical status classification (absolute standardized difference [0.19-1.25]).
There were differences in intraoperative invasive monitoring and use of vasopressor or inotrope among the classifications, and a score of 3 or higher reduced the risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting more than a score of 1-2.
美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分类系统常用于术前评估。手术前患者的身体状况对术后恶心呕吐可能起重要作用。然而,身体状况分类与术后恶心呕吐之间的关系尚未明确界定。
纳入2015年至2020年间接受麻醉手术的18岁及以上成年人。我们使用倾向评分匹配和Cox风险回归分析术后恶心呕吐与身体状况分类评分之间的关系。根据分类调查术中血管升压药和正性肌力药物的使用以及侵入性监测的差异。
共纳入163,500例患者。匹配后,1级与2级包括43,400例患者;1级与≤3级,13,287例患者;2级与≤3级,23,530例患者(绝对标准化差异,0 - 0.06)。身体状况分类≤3级的患者术后恶心呕吐风险明显低于1 - 2级患者(身体状况分类1级与≤3级,风险比0.76 [0.71 - 0.82],P < 0.001;2级与≤3级,风险比0.86 [0.82 - 0.91],P < 0.001)。身体状况分类高的患者术中血管升压药或正性肌力药物的使用以及侵入性监测比身体状况分类低的患者更多(绝对标准化差异[0.19 - 1.25])。
各分类之间术中侵入性监测以及血管升压药或正性肌力药物的使用存在差异,3分及以上比分1 - 2分更能降低术后恶心呕吐的风险。