Suppr超能文献

T细胞免疫是大流行终局的关键:如何测量和监测它。

T cell immunity is key to the pandemic endgame: How to measure and monitor it.

作者信息

Schwarz Megan, Mzoughi Slim, Lozano-Ojalvo Daniel, Tan Anthony T, Bertoletti Antonio, Guccione Ernesto

机构信息

Department of Oncological Sciences, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, USA.

Center for Therapeutics Discovery, Department of Oncological Sciences and Pharmacological Sciences, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.

出版信息

Curr Res Immunol. 2022;3:215-221. doi: 10.1016/j.crimmu.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Sep 1.

Abstract

As vaccine deployment improves the healthcare emergency status caused by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, we need reliable tools to evaluate the duration of protective immunity at a global scale. Seminal studies have demonstrated that while neutralizing antibodies can protect us from viral infection, T cell-mediated cellular immunity provides long-term protection from severe COVID-19, even in the case of emerging new variants of concern (VOC). Indeed, the emergence of VOCs, able to substantially escape antibodies generated by current vaccines, has made the analysis of correlates of humoral protection against infection obsolete. The focus should now shift towards immunological correlates of protection from disease based on quantification of cellular immunity. Despite this evidence, an assessment of T cell responses is still overlooked. This is largely due to technical challenges and lack of validated diagnostic tests. Here, we review the current state of the art of available tests to distinguish between SARS-CoV-2 antigen-specific Tcells and non-antigen specific T-cells. These assays range from the analysis of the T cell-receptor (TCR) diversity (i.e. Immunoseq and MHC tetramer staining) to the detection of functional T cell activation (i.e. ICS, AIM, Elispot, ELLA, dqTACT, etc.) either from purified Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMCs) or whole blood. We discuss advantages and disadvantages of each assay, proposing their ideal use for different scopes. Finally, we argue how it is paramount to deploy cheap, standardized, and scalable assays to measure T cell functionality to fill this critical diagnostic gap and manage these next years of the pandemic.

摘要

随着疫苗的推广改善了由SARS-CoV-2大流行引起的医疗紧急状况,我们需要可靠的工具来在全球范围内评估保护性免疫的持续时间。开创性研究表明,虽然中和抗体可以保护我们免受病毒感染,但T细胞介导的细胞免疫能为我们提供针对重症COVID-19的长期保护,即使在出现新的关注变异株(VOC)的情况下也是如此。事实上,能够大量逃避当前疫苗所产生抗体的VOC的出现,使得对针对感染的体液保护相关因素的分析变得过时。现在应将重点转向基于细胞免疫量化的疾病保护免疫相关因素。尽管有这些证据,但对T细胞反应的评估仍然被忽视。这主要是由于技术挑战以及缺乏经过验证的诊断测试。在这里,我们回顾了区分SARS-CoV-2抗原特异性T细胞和非抗原特异性T细胞的现有测试的当前技术水平。这些检测方法从T细胞受体(TCR)多样性分析(即免疫测序和MHC四聚体染色)到从纯化的外周血单核细胞(PBMC)或全血中检测功能性T细胞激活(即ICS、AIM、Elispot、ELLA、dqTACT等)。我们讨论了每种检测方法的优缺点,提出了它们在不同范围内的理想用途。最后,我们认为部署廉价、标准化且可扩展的检测方法来测量T细胞功能以填补这一关键诊断空白并应对大流行的未来几年至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac69/9445894/cdfe20fe9431/ga1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验