• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

密歇根州高危成年人自杀预防同伴支持干预:一项随机临床试验

Peer Support Intervention for Suicide Prevention Among High-Risk Adults in Michigan: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Pfeiffer Paul N, Abraham Kristen M, Lapidos Adrienne, Vega Eduardo, Jagusch Jennifer, Garlick James, Pasiak Sara, Ganoczy Dara, Kim H Myra, Ahmedani Brian, Ilgen Mark, King Cheryl

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.

VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2510808. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.10808.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.10808
PMID:40434775
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12120652/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Innovative approaches to address interpersonal risk factors for suicide attempts and suicidal ideation may help reduce persistently elevated suicide rates in the US.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether Peers for Valued Living (PREVAIL), a posthospital peer support intervention, reduces suicide attempts and suicidal ideation among adults psychiatrically hospitalized for suicide risk.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This single-masked, randomized clinical trial recruited adult psychiatric inpatients aged 18 years or older from 3 Michigan-based facilities between June 22, 2018, and December 30, 2022. The study compared 3 months of the PREVAIL intervention plus enhanced usual care with enhanced usual care only, with 3 months of postintervention follow-up.

INTERVENTION

One-on-one support from a peer specialist initiated during hospital admission and continued 3 months after discharge.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Suicide attempts were measured using the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale, and suicidal ideation was measured using the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation at 3 and 6 months after randomization.

RESULTS

Of 5310 patients screened, 455 were randomized using a minimization algorithm. A total of 229 participants were randomized to the PREVAIL peer mentorship arm (mean [SD] age, 32.4 [14.0] years, 134 women [58.5%]), and 226 were randomized to the enhanced usual care arm (mean [SD] age, 31.6 [13.5] years; 139 women [61.5%]). In the intention-to-treat sample with nonmissing data, the percentage of participants with any suicide attempt over 6 months (including participants who only completed 3-month follow-up assessments) was 17.2% (28 of 163) for enhanced usual care and 14.9% (24 of 161 with 2 deaths by suicide) for PREVAIL. Mean (SD) suicidal ideation scores were 4.3 (95% CI, 3.2-5.3) for enhanced usual care and 4.9 (95% CI, 3.7-6.1) for PREVAIL at 6 months. There were no statistically significant effects of the intervention for either outcome in the primary analyses. In post hoc analyses, the interaction between study arm and the COVID-19 pandemic was statistically significant. The enhanced usual care arm had a mean (SD) 6-month suicidal ideation score of 3.5 (6.1) before and 6.1 (7.4) after the pandemic vs the PREVAIL arm (mean [SD] scores, 5.0 [7.7] and 4.5 [6.6], respectively). There were 2 study-related adverse events, with 1 resulting in participant withdrawal from the intervention arm.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this randomized clinical trial, the peer-delivered PREVAIL intervention up to 3 months after discharge did not significantly differ from enhanced usual care in terms of reducing subsequent suicide attempts or suicidal ideation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03373916.

摘要

重要性

采用创新方法应对自杀未遂和自杀意念的人际风险因素,可能有助于降低美国持续居高不下的自杀率。

目的

确定出院后同伴支持干预项目“珍视生命同伴支持”(PREVAIL)是否能降低因自杀风险而接受精神科住院治疗的成年人的自杀未遂和自杀意念发生率。

设计、背景和参与者:这项单盲随机临床试验于2018年6月22日至2022年12月30日期间,从密歇根州的3家医疗机构招募了18岁及以上的成年精神科住院患者。该研究将3个月的PREVAIL干预加强化常规护理与仅强化常规护理进行比较,并进行3个月的干预后随访。

干预措施

在住院期间由同伴专家提供一对一支持,并在出院后持续3个月。

主要结局和测量指标

采用哥伦比亚自杀严重程度评定量表测量自杀未遂情况,在随机分组后3个月和6个月时,采用贝克自杀意念量表测量自杀意念。

结果

在筛查的5310名患者中,455名通过最小化算法进行随机分组。共有229名参与者被随机分配到PREVAIL同伴指导组(平均[标准差]年龄为32.4[14.0]岁,134名女性[58.5%]),226名被随机分配到强化常规护理组(平均[标准差]年龄为31.6[13.5]岁;139名女性[61.5%])。在意向性分析样本中,强化常规护理组在6个月内有任何自杀未遂的参与者比例(包括仅完成3个月随访评估的参与者)为17.2%(163名中的28名),PREVAIL组为14.9%(161名中的24名,其中2人自杀死亡)。强化常规护理组在6个月时的平均(标准差)自杀意念得分为4.3(95%置信区间,3.2 - 5.3),PREVAIL组为4.9(95%置信区间,3.7 - 6.1)。在主要分析中,该干预措施对这两个结局均无统计学显著影响。在事后分析中,研究组与新冠疫情之间的交互作用具有统计学显著性。强化常规护理组在疫情前6个月的平均(标准差)自杀意念得分为3.5(6.1),疫情后为6.1(7.4),而PREVAIL组(平均[标准差]得分分别为5.0[7.7]和4.5[6.6])。有2起与研究相关的不良事件,其中1起导致参与者退出干预组。

结论与意义

在这项随机临床试验中,出院后长达3个月的同伴提供的PREVAIL干预在减少后续自杀未遂或自杀意念方面与强化常规护理没有显著差异。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03373916。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78f/12120652/d77b0be3a578/jamanetwopen-e2510808-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78f/12120652/7f31bc109aef/jamanetwopen-e2510808-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78f/12120652/d77b0be3a578/jamanetwopen-e2510808-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78f/12120652/7f31bc109aef/jamanetwopen-e2510808-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a78f/12120652/d77b0be3a578/jamanetwopen-e2510808-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Peer Support Intervention for Suicide Prevention Among High-Risk Adults in Michigan: A Randomized Clinical Trial.密歇根州高危成年人自杀预防同伴支持干预:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2510808. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.10808.
2
A Digital Therapeutic Intervention for Inpatients With Elevated Suicide Risk: A Randomized Clinical Trial.一项针对自杀风险升高的住院患者的数字治疗干预:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2525809. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.25809.
3
Telehealth Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Suicide Prevention: A Randomized Clinical Trial.远程医疗预防自杀的简短认知行为疗法:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2445913. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45913.
4
Prevention of self-harm and suicide in young people up to the age of 25 in education settings.在教育环境中预防25岁及以下年轻人的自我伤害和自杀行为。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;12(12):CD013844. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013844.pub2.
5
Risk Model-Guided Clinical Decision Support for Suicide Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial.风险模型指导的自杀筛查临床决策支持:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2452371. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52371.
6
A Recovery-Oriented Suicide Prevention Program Led by Peer Specialists for Veterans With Serious Mental Illness: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.由同伴专家主导的针对患有严重精神疾病退伍军人的以康复为导向的自杀预防项目:一项试点随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 20;14:e66182. doi: 10.2196/66182.
7
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
8
Lithium Treatment in the Prevention of Repeat Suicide-Related Outcomes in Veterans With Major Depression or Bipolar Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.锂盐治疗对预防有重度抑郁症或双相情感障碍的退伍军人重复自杀相关结局的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 1;79(1):24-32. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.3170.
9
Interventions for primary prevention of suicide in university and other post-secondary educational settings.针对大学及其他高等教育环境中自杀初级预防的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 29;2014(10):CD009439. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009439.pub2.
10
Psychological therapies versus antidepressant medication, alone and in combination for depression in children and adolescents.心理疗法与抗抑郁药物单独及联合使用治疗儿童和青少年抑郁症的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 30;2014(11):CD008324. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008324.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
The effectiveness, implementation, and experiences of peer support approaches for mental health: a systematic umbrella review.同伴支持方法在心理健康方面的效果、实施和经验:系统的伞式综述。
BMC Med. 2024 Feb 29;22(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03260-y.
2
The effectiveness of peer support for individuals with mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis.同伴支持对精神疾病患者的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2023 Aug;53(11):5332-5341. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722002422. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
3
Stigma and Peer-Led Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
污名与同伴主导干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 5;13:915617. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.915617. eCollection 2022.
4
An Update of Peer Support/Peer Provided Services Underlying Processes, Benefits, and Critical Ingredients.同伴支持/同伴提供服务的更新:潜在过程、益处和关键要素。
Psychiatr Q. 2022 Jun;93(2):571-586. doi: 10.1007/s11126-022-09971-w. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
5
Effectiveness of Family- and Individual-Led Peer Support for People With Serious Mental Illness: A Meta-Analysis.家庭和个体主导的同伴支持对严重精神疾病患者的有效性:一项荟萃分析。
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2022 Feb;60(2):20-26. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20210818-01. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
6
A systematic review and meta-analysis of group peer support interventions for people experiencing mental health conditions.系统评价和荟萃分析团体同伴支持干预对心理健康状况人群的影响。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 23;21(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03321-z.
7
Peer-based interventions targeting suicide prevention: A scoping review.基于同伴的自杀预防干预措施:范围综述。
Am J Community Psychol. 2021 Sep;68(1-2):232-248. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12510. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
8
The effectiveness of one-to-one peer support in mental health services: a systematic review and meta-analysis.一对一同伴支持在精神卫生服务中的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 11;20(1):534. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02923-3.
9
The impact of mental health recovery narratives on recipients experiencing mental health problems: Qualitative analysis and change model.心理健康康复叙事对经历心理健康问题的接受者的影响:定性分析和变化模型。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 13;14(12):e0226201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226201. eCollection 2019.
10
Peer mentorship to reduce suicide attempts among high-risk adults (PREVAIL): Rationale and design of a randomized controlled effectiveness-implementation trial.同辈导师制降低高危成年人自杀企图(PREVAIL):一项随机对照有效性实施试验的原理和设计。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Dec;87:105850. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.105850. Epub 2019 Sep 13.