Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情期间数字监控技术的公平设计和使用:规范和关切。

Equitable Design and Use of Digital Surveillance Technologies During COVID-19: Norms and Concerns.

机构信息

Queensland Bioethics Centre, 95359Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia.

School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Dec;17(5):573-586. doi: 10.1177/15562646221118127. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

Abstract

Given the unprecedented scale of digital surveillance in the COVID-19 pandemic, designing and implementing digital technologies in ways that are equitable is critical now and in future epidemics and pandemics. Yet to date there has been very limited consideration about what is necessary to promote their equitable design and implementation. In this study, literature relating to the use of digital surveillance technologies during epidemics and pandemics was collected and thematically analyzed for ethical norms and concerns related to equity and social justice. Eleven norms are reported, including procedural fairness and inclusive approaches to design and implementation, designing to rectify or avoid exacerbating inequities, and fair access. Identified concerns relate to digital divides, stigma and discrimination, disparate risk of harm, and unfair design processes. We conclude by considering what dimensions of social justice the norms promote and whether identified concerns can be addressed by building the identified norms into technology design and implementation practice.

摘要

鉴于 COVID-19 大流行期间前所未有的数字监控规模,现在和未来的传染病和大流行中,以公平的方式设计和实施数字技术至关重要。然而,迄今为止,对于促进其公平设计和实施所需的条件,考虑得非常有限。在这项研究中,收集了与传染病和大流行期间使用数字监控技术有关的文献,并对与公平和社会正义相关的伦理规范和问题进行了主题分析。报告了 11 项规范,包括程序公平和设计与实施的包容性方法、设计以纠正或避免加剧不平等以及公平获取。确定的问题涉及数字鸿沟、污名化和歧视、不同的伤害风险以及不公平的设计流程。最后,我们考虑了规范所促进的社会正义的哪些方面,以及通过将确定的规范纳入技术设计和实施实践,是否可以解决确定的问题。

相似文献

1
Equitable Design and Use of Digital Surveillance Technologies During COVID-19: Norms and Concerns.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Dec;17(5):573-586. doi: 10.1177/15562646221118127. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
2
Equitable data sharing in epidemics and pandemics.
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Oct 6;22(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00701-8.
3
Pandemic Surveillance and Racialized Subpopulations: Mitigating Vulnerabilities in COVID-19 Apps.
J Bioeth Inq. 2020 Dec;17(4):829-834. doi: 10.1007/s11673-020-10034-7. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
8
Applications of digital technology in COVID-19 pandemic planning and response.
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Aug;2(8):e435-e440. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30142-4. Epub 2020 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Lessons Learned from the Launch and Implementation of the COVID-19 Contact Tracing Program in New York City: a Qualitative Study.
J Urban Health. 2024 Oct;101(5):888-897. doi: 10.1007/s11524-024-00898-0. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
2
Emerging advances in biosecurity to underpin human, animal, plant, and ecosystem health.
iScience. 2023 Jul 31;26(9):107462. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107462. eCollection 2023 Sep 15.
3
Use of digital technologies for public health surveillance during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review.
Digit Health. 2023 May 17;9:20552076231173220. doi: 10.1177/20552076231173220. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
4
The German COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing App: A Socioeconomic Evaluation.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 2;19(21):14318. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114318.

本文引用的文献

1
Equitable data sharing in epidemics and pandemics.
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Oct 6;22(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00701-8.
2
The epidemiological impact of the NHS COVID-19 app.
Nature. 2021 Jun;594(7863):408-412. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03606-z. Epub 2021 May 12.
3
Pandemic precarity: COVID-19 is exposing and exacerbating inequalities in the American heartland.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 23;118(8). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2020685118.
4
Covid-19 pandemic and the social determinants of health.
BMJ. 2021 Jan 28;372:n129. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n129.
5
COVID-19-break the cycle of inequality.
Lancet Public Health. 2021 Feb;6(2):e82. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00011-6. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
6
Digital contact tracing and exposure notification: ethical guidance for trustworthy pandemic management.
Ethics Inf Technol. 2021;23(3):285-294. doi: 10.1007/s10676-020-09566-8. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
7
Mind the App-Considerations on the Ethical Risks of COVID-19 Apps.
Philos Technol. 2020;33(2):167-172. doi: 10.1007/s13347-020-00408-5. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
8
The Perfect Moral Storm: Diverse Ethical Considerations in the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2020 May 28;12(2):65-83. doi: 10.1007/s41649-020-00125-3. eCollection 2020 Jun.
9
Digital tools against COVID-19: taxonomy, ethical challenges, and navigation aid.
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Aug;2(8):e425-e434. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30137-0. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
10
Using Digital Data to Protect and Promote the Most Vulnerable in the Fight Against COVID-19.
Front Public Health. 2020 Jun 12;8:296. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00296. eCollection 2020.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验