• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

NHS COVID-19 应用程序的流行病学影响。

The epidemiological impact of the NHS COVID-19 app.

机构信息

Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Zühlke Engineering Ltd, London, UK.

出版信息

Nature. 2021 Jun;594(7863):408-412. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03606-z. Epub 2021 May 12.

DOI:10.1038/s41586-021-03606-z
PMID:33979832
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has seen the emergence of digital contact tracing to help to prevent the spread of the disease. A mobile phone app records proximity events between app users, and when a user tests positive for COVID-19, their recent contacts can be notified instantly. Theoretical evidence has supported this new public health intervention, but its epidemiological impact has remained uncertain. Here we investigate the impact of the National Health Service (NHS) COVID-19 app for England and Wales, from its launch on 24 September 2020 to the end of December 2020. It was used regularly by approximately 16.5 million users (28% of the total population), and sent approximately 1.7 million exposure notifications: 4.2 per index case consenting to contact tracing. We estimated that the fraction of individuals notified by the app who subsequently showed symptoms and tested positive (the secondary attack rate (SAR)) was 6%, similar to the SAR for manually traced close contacts. We estimated the number of cases averted by the app using two complementary approaches: modelling based on the notifications and SAR gave an estimate of 284,000 (central 95% range of sensitivity analyses 108,000-450,000), and statistical comparison of matched neighbouring local authorities gave an estimate of 594,000 (95% confidence interval 317,000-914,000). Approximately one case was averted for each case consenting to notification of their contacts. We estimated that for every percentage point increase in app uptake, the number of cases could be reduced by 0.8% (using modelling) or 2.3% (using statistical analysis). These findings support the continued development and deployment of such apps in populations that are awaiting full protection from vaccines.

摘要

新冠疫情期间出现了数字接触者追踪,以帮助防止疾病传播。一款手机应用程序记录应用程序用户之间的接近事件,当用户 COVID-19 检测呈阳性时,他们最近的接触者会立即收到通知。理论证据支持这种新的公共卫生干预措施,但它的流行病学影响仍然不确定。在这里,我们研究了英格兰和威尔士国民保健服务(NHS) COVID-19 应用程序从 2020 年 9 月 24 日推出到 2020 年 12 月底的影响。它被大约 1650 万用户(总人口的 28%)定期使用,并发送了大约 170 万条暴露通知:每例同意接触追踪的索引病例通知 4.2 例。我们估计,应用程序通知的人随后出现症状并检测呈阳性的比例(继发感染率(SAR))为 6%,与手动追踪密切接触者的 SAR 相似。我们使用两种互补方法估计应用程序避免的病例数:基于通知和 SAR 的建模给出了 284000 例(敏感性分析的中心 95%范围为 108000-450000)的估计值,以及对匹配的相邻地方当局的统计比较给出了 594000 例(95%置信区间 317000-914000)的估计值。大约每例同意通知其接触者的病例就可避免一例。我们估计,应用程序使用率每增加一个百分点,病例数就可以减少 0.8%(使用建模)或 2.3%(使用统计分析)。这些发现支持在等待疫苗全面保护的人群中继续开发和部署此类应用程序。

相似文献

1
The epidemiological impact of the NHS COVID-19 app.NHS COVID-19 应用程序的流行病学影响。
Nature. 2021 Jun;594(7863):408-412. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03606-z. Epub 2021 May 12.
2
Digital contact tracing technologies in epidemics: a rapid review.数字接触追踪技术在传染病疫情中的应用:快速综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Aug 18;8(8):CD013699. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013699.
3
A Data-Driven Simulation of the Exposure Notification Cascade for Digital Contact Tracing of SARS-CoV-2 in Zurich, Switzerland.基于数据的瑞士苏黎世 SARS-CoV-2 数字接触者追踪中暴露通知级联的仿真。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e218184. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.8184.
4
Effectiveness evaluation of digital contact tracing for COVID-19 in New South Wales, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州数字接触者追踪在 COVID-19 中的效果评估。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Mar;7(3):e250-e258. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00010-X. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
5
Epidemiological impacts of the NHS COVID-19 app in England and Wales throughout its first year.英格兰和威尔士全民保健制度 COVID-19 应用程序在其第一年的流行病学影响。
Nat Commun. 2023 Feb 22;14(1):858. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36495-z.
6
Adherence and Association of Digital Proximity Tracing App Notifications With Earlier Time to Quarantine: Results From the Zurich SARS-CoV-2 Cohort Study.数字接触者追踪应用通知的遵从性及其与更早隔离时间的关联:来自苏黎世 SARS-CoV-2 队列研究的结果。
Int J Public Health. 2021 Aug 16;66:1603992. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2021.1603992. eCollection 2021.
7
Using Venn Diagrams to Evaluate Digital Contact Tracing: Panel Survey Analysis.使用文氏图评估数字接触者追踪:面板调查分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Dec 6;7(12):e30004. doi: 10.2196/30004.
8
Performance of the Swiss Digital Contact-Tracing App Over Various SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic Waves: Repeated Cross-sectional Analyses.瑞士数字化接触者追踪应用在不同 SARS-CoV-2 大流行波次中的表现:重复横断面分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Nov 11;8(11):e41004. doi: 10.2196/41004.
9
Quality and Adoption of COVID-19 Tracing Apps and Recommendations for Development: Systematic Interdisciplinary Review of European Apps.**COVID-19 追踪应用的质量和采用情况,以及开发建议:对欧洲应用的系统跨学科审查。**
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 2;23(6):e27989. doi: 10.2196/27989.
10
Digital measurement of SARS-CoV-2 transmission risk from 7 million contacts.从 700 万接触者中数字测量 SARS-CoV-2 的传播风险。
Nature. 2024 Feb;626(7997):145-150. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06952-2. Epub 2023 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
A policy roadmap for sustainable mass-testing.可持续大规模检测的政策路线图。
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Jul 29;3(8):qxaf151. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf151. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Addressing survey fatigue bias in longitudinal social contact studies to improve pandemic preparedness.解决纵向社会接触研究中的调查疲劳偏差以改善大流行防范能力。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 23;15(1):17935. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02235-0.
3
Artificial intelligence for modelling infectious disease epidemics.用于传染病流行建模的人工智能

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England.评估 SARS-CoV-2 谱系 B.1.1.7 在英国的传播能力。
Nature. 2021 May;593(7858):266-269. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03470-x. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
2
Modeling the effect of exposure notification and non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 transmission in Washington state.模拟暴露通知和非药物干预措施对华盛顿州新冠病毒传播的影响。
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Mar 12;4(1):49. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00422-7.
3
Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control.
Nature. 2025 Feb;638(8051):623-635. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08564-w. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
4
Embedding risk monitoring in infectious disease surveillance for timely and effective outbreak prevention and control.将风险监测嵌入传染病监测中,以实现及时有效的疫情预防和控制。
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Feb 17;10(2):e016870. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016870.
5
Epidemiological methods in transition: Minimizing biases in classical and digital approaches.转型中的流行病学方法:最大限度减少传统方法和数字方法中的偏差。
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Jan 13;4(1):e0000670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000670. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
Towards pandemic preparedness: ability to estimate high-resolution social contact patterns from longitudinal surveys.迈向大流行防范:从纵向调查中估计高分辨率社会接触模式的能力。
Res Sq. 2024 Dec 11:rs.3.rs-5182601. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-5182601/v1.
7
Temporal contact patterns and the implications for predicting superspreaders and planning of targeted outbreak control.时间接触模式及其对预测超级传播者和有针对性的疫情防控规划的影响。
J R Soc Interface. 2024 Dec;21(221):20240358. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0358. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
8
Predictors of the continuous use of an infectious disease self-management app for epidemiological investigations: a survey of young and middle-aged adults in South Korean citizens.用于传染病自我管理的应用程序的连续使用的预测因素:对韩国公民中年轻和中年成年人的调查。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 16;24(1):1419. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11937-6.
9
Effectiveness of probabilistic contact tracing in epidemic containment: The role of superspreaders and transmission path reconstruction.概率性接触者追踪在疫情控制中的有效性:超级传播者的作用和传播路径重建
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Sep 3;3(9):pgae377. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae377. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
Evaluation of the effectiveness of Washington State's digital COVID-19 exposure notification system over one pandemic year.评估华盛顿州数字化 COVID-19 接触者通知系统在一个大流行年度内的有效性。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 14;12:1408178. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1408178. eCollection 2024.
基于经验接触网络的数字接触追踪在大流行控制中的应用。
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 12;12(1):1655. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21809-w.
4
Estimated transmissibility and impact of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England.在英格兰,估计 SARS-CoV-2 谱系 B.1.1.7 的传染性和影响。
Science. 2021 Apr 9;372(6538). doi: 10.1126/science.abg3055. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
5
Time to evaluate COVID-19 contact-tracing apps.评估新冠病毒接触者追踪应用程序的时机到了。
Nat Med. 2021 Mar;27(3):361-362. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01236-6.
6
A population-based controlled experiment assessing the epidemiological impact of digital contact tracing.基于人群的对照实验评估数字接触者追踪的流行病学影响。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 26;12(1):587. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20817-6.
7
To quarantine, or not to quarantine: A theoretical framework for disease control via contact tracing.隔离,还是不隔离:通过接触者追踪进行疾病控制的理论框架。
Epidemics. 2021 Mar;34:100428. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2020.100428. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
8
Early evidence of effectiveness of digital contact tracing for SARS-CoV-2 in Switzerland.瑞士数字接触者追踪在 SARS-CoV-2 防控中的早期有效性证据。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2020 Dec 16;150:w20457. doi: 10.4414/smw.2020.20457. eCollection 2020 Dec 14.
9
Implication of backward contact tracing in the presence of overdispersed transmission in COVID-19 outbreaks.在新冠疫情中存在过度分散传播的情况下反向接触者追踪的意义。
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Mar 31;5:239. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16344.3. eCollection 2020.
10
Impact of delays on effectiveness of contact tracing strategies for COVID-19: a modelling study.新冠病毒接触者追踪策略有效性延迟的影响:建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Aug;5(8):e452-e459. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30157-2. Epub 2020 Jul 16.