• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术后膜部尿道长度和膀胱尿道吻合位置对机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺根治术后短期控尿恢复的意义。

Significance of postoperative membranous urethral length and position of vesicourethral anastomosis for short-term continence recovery following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Urol. 2022 Sep 7;22(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01097-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12894-022-01097-2
PMID:36071427
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9450420/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

We assess whether short-term recovery of urinary incontinence following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RARP) is associated with postoperative membranous urethral length (MUL) and position of vesico-urethral anastomosis (PVUA).

METHODS

Clinical variables including PVUA and pre-and postoperative MUL were evaluated in 251 patients who underwent RARP from August 2019 to February 2021. Continence recovery was defined as no pad or one security liner per day assessed by patient interview at least 6 months follow-up. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess variables associated with continence recovery at 3 months after the operation.

RESULTS

Continence recovery rates at 3 and 6 months were 75% and 84%, respectively. Lower BMI (< 25 kg/m) (p = 0.040), longer preoperative MUL (≥ 9.5 mm) (p = 0.013), longer postoperative MUL (≥ 9 mm) (p < 0.001), higher PVUA (< 14.5 mm) (p = 0.019) and shorter operating time (< 170 min) (p = 0.013) were significantly associated with continence recovery at 3 months in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis revealed that postoperative MUL (OR 3.75, 95% CI 1.90-7.40, p < 0.001) and higher PVUA (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.07-3.82, p = 0.032) were independent factors for continence recovery. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the multivariate analysis, with urinary continence recovery rates found to have increased in turn with rates of 43.7% versus 68.2% versus 85.0% (p < 0.001) at 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

PVUA and postoperative MUL were significant factors for short-term continence recovery. Preservation of urethral length might contribute to continence recovery after RARP.

摘要

背景

我们评估机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)后短期尿失禁恢复是否与术后膜状尿道长度(MUL)和膀胱尿道吻合术位置(PVUA)有关。

方法

评估了 2019 年 8 月至 2021 年 2 月期间接受 RARP 的 251 例患者的 PVUA 和术前及术后 MUL 等临床变量。通过患者在至少 6 个月的随访中每天进行一次访谈,评估有无垫或一个安全衬垫来确定是否恢复尿控。使用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析来评估与术后 3 个月时恢复尿控相关的变量。

结果

术后 3 个月和 6 个月的尿控恢复率分别为 75%和 84%。较低的 BMI(<25kg/m)(p=0.040)、较长的术前 MUL(≥9.5mm)(p=0.013)、较长的术后 MUL(≥9mm)(p<0.001)、较高的 PVUA(<14.5mm)(p=0.019)和较短的手术时间(<170min)(p=0.013)在单变量分析中与术后 3 个月时的尿控恢复显著相关。多变量分析显示,术后 MUL(OR 3.75,95%CI 1.90-7.40,p<0.001)和较高的 PVUA(OR 2.02,95%CI 1.07-3.82,p=0.032)是尿控恢复的独立因素。根据多变量分析将患者分为 3 组,发现尿控恢复率依次增加,3 个月时分别为 43.7%、68.2%和 85.0%(p<0.001)。

结论

PVUA 和术后 MUL 是短期尿控恢复的重要因素。保留尿道长度可能有助于 RARP 后恢复尿控。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b713/9450420/f83d2b9af937/12894_2022_1097_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b713/9450420/33d48fb08518/12894_2022_1097_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b713/9450420/f83d2b9af937/12894_2022_1097_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b713/9450420/33d48fb08518/12894_2022_1097_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b713/9450420/f83d2b9af937/12894_2022_1097_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Significance of postoperative membranous urethral length and position of vesicourethral anastomosis for short-term continence recovery following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.术后膜部尿道长度和膀胱尿道吻合位置对机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺根治术后短期控尿恢复的意义。
BMC Urol. 2022 Sep 7;22(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01097-2.
2
Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using the Novel Urethral Fixation Technique Versus Standard Vesicourethral Anastomosis.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术采用新型尿道固定技术与标准膀胱尿道吻合术的比较。
Eur Urol. 2021 Apr;79(4):530-536. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.028. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3
Minimal residual membranous urethral length and membranous urethral length predict poor recovery from incontinence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and after open radical prostatectomy.最小残余膜尿道长度和膜尿道长度可预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后和开放性根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁恢复不良。
Int J Urol. 2022 Dec;29(12):1517-1523. doi: 10.1111/iju.15030. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
4
Factors Contributing to Early Recovery of Urinary Continence Analyzed by Pre- and Postoperative Pelvic Anatomical Features at Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.通过机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术前后盆腔解剖特征分析尿失禁早期恢复的影响因素。
J Endourol. 2015 Jun;29(6):683-90. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0708. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
5
Simple and reliable predictive factor for early recovery of urinary continence after non-nerve-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.非神经保留机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后尿控早期恢复的简单可靠预测因素。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):1077-1083. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01516-4. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
6
Variations in predictors for urinary continence recovery at different time periods following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助前列腺根治术后不同时间段尿控恢复的预测因素的变化。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2024 Jan;17(1):e13243. doi: 10.1111/ases.13243. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
7
[Relationship between recovery of urinary continence after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and preoperative/postoperative membranous urethral length].腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁恢复与术前/术后膜部尿道长度的关系
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Apr 18;54(2):299-303. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.02.017.
8
Association Between Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Urethral Parameters and Continence Recovery Following Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.基于术前磁共振成像的尿道参数与机器人辅助前列腺根治术后控尿功能恢复的关系。
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Sep 15;6(5):1013-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
9
Appropriate preoperative membranous urethral length predicts recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.术前适当的膜尿道长度可预测机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术后尿控的恢复情况。
World J Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov 16;16(1):224. doi: 10.1186/s12957-018-1523-2.
10
Postoperative membranous urethral length is the single most important surgical factor predicting recovery of postoperative urinary continence.术后膜状尿道长度是预测术后尿控恢复的唯一最重要的手术因素。
Urol Oncol. 2020 Dec;38(12):930.e7-930.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.07.024. Epub 2020 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between maximal urethral length preservation and postoperative continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后最大尿道长度保留与术后控尿之间的关联:一项荟萃分析和系统评价
Asian J Androl. 2025 Mar 1;27(2):225-230. doi: 10.4103/aja202481. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
2
Early recovery of urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with membranous urethra and neurovascular bundle preservation.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿控功能的早期恢复与膜部尿道和神经血管束的保留有关。
Int J Urol. 2024 May;31(5):492-499. doi: 10.1111/iju.15388. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Novel anatomical apical dissection utilizing puboprostatic "open-collar" technique: Impact on apical surgical margin and early continence recovery.采用耻骨前列腺“开放环”技术的新型解剖学顶端剥离术:对顶端手术切缘及早期控尿恢复的影响
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 15;16(4):e0249991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249991. eCollection 2021.
2
Postoperative membranous urethral length is the single most important surgical factor predicting recovery of postoperative urinary continence.术后膜状尿道长度是预测术后尿控恢复的唯一最重要的手术因素。
Urol Oncol. 2020 Dec;38(12):930.e7-930.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.07.024. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
3
Simple and reliable predictive factor for early recovery of urinary continence after non-nerve-sparing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
非神经保留机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后尿控早期恢复的简单可靠预测因素。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):1077-1083. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01516-4. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
Improvement in early urinary continence recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy based on postoperative pelvic anatomic features: a retrospective review.
基于术后盆腔解剖特征的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后早期尿控恢复的改善:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Urol. 2019 Sep 18;19(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0519-8.
4
Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy vs the standard approach: a systematic review and analysis of comparative outcomes.保留 Retzius 间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与标准方法的比较:系统评价和比较结果分析。
BJU Int. 2020 Jan;125(1):8-16. doi: 10.1111/bju.14887. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
5
Functional and Oncologic Outcomes Between Open and Robotic Radical Prostatectomy at 24-month Follow-up in the Swedish LAPPRO Trial.在瑞典 LAPPRO 试验中,24 个月随访时开放与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的功能与肿瘤学结果。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Oct;1(5):353-360. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
6
Posterior, Anterior, and Periurethral Surgical Reconstruction of Urinary Continence Mechanisms in Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Description and Video Compilation of Commonly Performed Surgical Techniques.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中尿控机制的后、前和尿道周围外科重建:常用手术技术的描述和视频汇编。
Eur Urol. 2019 Dec;76(6):814-822. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.035. Epub 2018 Dec 2.
7
Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术与开放经耻骨后前列腺根治术的比较:一项随机对照研究的 24 个月结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug;19(8):1051-1060. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30357-7. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
8
A Novel Approach for Apical Dissection During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: The "Collar" Technique.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术时尖部解剖的新方法:“颈圈”技术。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Sep;4(5):677-685. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 May 7.
9
Retzius-sparing Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Associated with Less Bladder Neck Descent and Better Early Continence Outcome.保留雷氏间隙的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与较少的膀胱颈下移及更好的早期控尿结果相关。
Anticancer Res. 2018 Jan;38(1):345-351. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12228.
10
The Effect of Nerve Sparing Status on Sexual and Urinary Function: 3-Year Results from the CEASAR Study.神经保留状态对性功能和尿控功能的影响:CEASAR 研究的 3 年结果。
J Urol. 2018 May;199(5):1202-1209. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.037. Epub 2017 Dec 16.