• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Testing equality of relative survival patterns based on aggregated data.

作者信息

Hakulinen T, Tenkanen L, Abeywickrama K, Päivärinta L

出版信息

Biometrics. 1987 Jun;43(2):313-25.

PMID:3607203
Abstract

The relative survival rate is defined as the ratio of the survival rate observed in a patient group under consideration to the survival rate expected in a group of people similar to the patient group at the beginning of the follow-up interval, with respect to all possible factors (e.g., age and sex) affecting survival, except the disease under study. Survival from cancer and other chronic diseases is often measured by this quantity, which is adjusted for the effect of mortality attributable to competing risks of death. In this paper, maximum likelihood ratio tests are constructed on the basis of aggregated data for testing the equality of relative survival rates between patient groups against proportional hazards and general alternative hypotheses. The tests are applied to the Finnish nationwide data on colon cancer patients with nonlocalized tumors as reported to the Finnish Cancer Registry. Simulation studies show that the maximum likelihood ratio tests compare favorably with alternative methods proposed earlier. Moreover, the maximum likelihood ratio tests are more extensive in coverage and are based on more applicable alternative hypotheses than the other test statistics. Finally, an extension to proportional hazards regression models of the relative survival rates is suggested.

摘要

相似文献

1
Testing equality of relative survival patterns based on aggregated data.
Biometrics. 1987 Jun;43(2):313-25.
2
Comparison of Cox's and relative survival models when estimating the effects of prognostic factors on disease-specific mortality: a simulation study under proportional excess hazards.在估计预后因素对疾病特异性死亡率的影响时Cox模型与相对生存模型的比较:比例超额风险下的模拟研究
Stat Med. 2005 Dec 30;24(24):3887-909. doi: 10.1002/sim.2392.
3
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.预防性卵巢切除术:降低美国上皮性卵巢癌死亡率。一场持续的争论。
Oncologist. 1996;1(5):326-330.
4
Effects of long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution on respiratory and cardiovascular mortality in the Netherlands: the NLCS-AIR study.长期暴露于交通相关空气污染对荷兰呼吸道和心血管疾病死亡率的影响:荷兰长期队列空气污染研究(NLCS-AIR研究)
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2009 Mar(139):5-71; discussion 73-89.
5
"Just Another Statistic".“只是又一个统计数字”
Oncologist. 1998;3(3):III-IV.
6
[Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].[意大利关于空气污染短期影响研究的荟萃分析]
Epidemiol Prev. 2001 Mar-Apr;25(2 Suppl):1-71.
7
A relative survival regression model using B-spline functions to model non-proportional hazards.一种使用B样条函数对非比例风险进行建模的相对生存回归模型。
Stat Med. 2003 Sep 15;22(17):2767-84. doi: 10.1002/sim.1484.
8
Specialized care and survival of ovarian cancer patients in The Netherlands: nationwide cohort study.荷兰卵巢癌患者的专科护理与生存情况:全国队列研究
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Mar 19;100(6):399-406. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn033. Epub 2008 Mar 11.
9
The impact of spontaneous tumour perforation on outcome following colon cancer surgery.自发性肿瘤穿孔对结肠癌手术后结局的影响。
Colorectal Dis. 2008 Oct;10(8):775-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2007.01412.x. Epub 2008 Feb 11.
10
Assessing time-by-covariate interactions in relative survival models using restrictive cubic spline functions.使用限制性立方样条函数评估相对生存模型中的时间-协变量交互作用。
J Cancer Epidemiol Prev. 2002;7(3):113-22.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term excess mortality of patients with treated and untreated unruptured intracranial aneurysms.治疗和未治疗的颅内未破裂动脉瘤患者的长期超额死亡率。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;84(8):888-92. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-303073. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
2
Influence of stage at diagnosis on survival differences for rectal cancer in three European populations.诊断分期对三个欧洲人群中直肠癌生存差异的影响。
Br J Cancer. 1999 Oct;81(3):463-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690716.
3
Survival after rectal cancer: differences between hospital catchment areas. A nationwide study in Sweden.
直肠癌患者的生存率:医院服务区域之间的差异。瑞典的一项全国性研究。
Gut. 1999 Jul;45(1):39-44. doi: 10.1136/gut.45.1.39.
4
Long term relative survival after surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysm in western Australia: population based study.西澳大利亚腹主动脉瘤手术后的长期相对生存率:基于人群的研究。
BMJ. 1998 Sep 26;317(7162):852-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7162.852.
5
Adjusting and comparing survival curves by means of an additive risk model.通过相加风险模型调整和比较生存曲线。
Lifetime Data Anal. 1998;4(2):149-68. doi: 10.1023/a:1009633523532.
6
Survival rates for four forms of cancer in the United States and Ontario.美国和安大略省四种癌症的生存率。
Am J Public Health. 1997 Jul;87(7):1164-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.7.1164.
7
Histological features of prognostic significance in CML--an immunohistochemical and morphometric study (multivariate regression analysis) on trephine biopsies of the bone marrow.慢性粒细胞白血病预后意义的组织学特征——骨髓活检切片的免疫组织化学和形态计量学研究(多变量回归分析)
Ann Hematol. 1993 Jun;66(6):291-302. doi: 10.1007/BF01695971.
8
Estimation and projections of stomach cancer trends in Italy.意大利胃癌趋势的评估与预测。
Cancer Causes Control. 1995 Jul;6(4):339-46. doi: 10.1007/BF00051409.