• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在学术界,拥有一席之地是远远不够的:论非裔女性的代表性问题。

A seat at the table is not enough: a perspective on Black women representation in academia.

机构信息

Peter Medawar Building for Pathogen Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Immunol Cell Biol. 2022 Oct;100(9):679-682. doi: 10.1111/imcb.12584. Epub 2022 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1111/imcb.12584
PMID:36073663
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9826098/
Abstract

This article is a personal perspective on the double-dose effect of racism and sexism on Black females within the academic system. I present statistical evidence of the under-representation of this group in academic leadership positions and discuss some factors - systematic and cultural - that have contributed to the low numbers of Black women in academic leadership. The detrimental impact of this under-representation is supported by anecdotes from other Black women in academia. Finally, I propose some practical solutions to increase the representation of Black women in academia through the proactive inclusion of Black women in the design of frameworks and policies targeted to improve racial and gender-based inequality.

摘要

这是一篇关于种族主义和性别歧视对学术体系中黑人女性的双重影响的个人观点文章。本文呈现了该群体在学术领导层中代表性不足的统计证据,并讨论了一些促成黑人女性在学术领导层中人数较少的系统性和文化性因素。这种代表性不足的不利影响得到了学术界其他黑人女性的轶事证据的支持。最后,我提出了一些切实可行的解决方案,通过积极将黑人女性纳入旨在改善种族和性别不平等的框架和政策的设计中,来增加学术界中黑人女性的代表性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b295/9826098/700b1bffe25a/IMCB-100-679-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b295/9826098/b8965421891c/IMCB-100-679-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b295/9826098/700b1bffe25a/IMCB-100-679-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b295/9826098/b8965421891c/IMCB-100-679-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b295/9826098/700b1bffe25a/IMCB-100-679-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A seat at the table is not enough: a perspective on Black women representation in academia.在学术界,拥有一席之地是远远不够的:论非裔女性的代表性问题。
Immunol Cell Biol. 2022 Oct;100(9):679-682. doi: 10.1111/imcb.12584. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
2
Turning Chutes into Ladders for Women Faculty: A Review and Roadmap for Equity in Academia.为女性教职员工打造晋升之阶:学术界公平的综述与路线图。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 May;29(5):721-733. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8027. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
3
Leadership experiences and practices of South African health managers: what is the influence of gender? -a qualitative, exploratory study.南非卫生管理人员的领导经验和实践:性别有何影响?——一项定性、探索性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Sep 18;17(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0859-0.
4
Women in anaesthesia: a scoping review.麻醉科中的女性:范围综述。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Mar;124(3):e134-e147. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.021. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
5
Increasing women in leadership in global health.增加全球卫生领域的女性领导力。
Acad Med. 2014 Aug;89(8):1103-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000369.
6
Race, ethnicity, and gender in academic obstetrics and gynecology: 12-year trends.学术妇产科中的种族、民族和性别:12 年趋势。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 Nov;2(4):100178. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100178. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
7
Differential retention contributes to racial/ethnic disparity in U.S. academia.差异保留导致美国学术界的种族/民族差异。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 1;16(12):e0259710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259710. eCollection 2021.
8
Visible, invisible: Black women in higher education.看得见的,看不见的:高等教育中的黑人女性
Front Sociol. 2023 Apr 20;8:974617. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.974617. eCollection 2023.
9
Diversification of Academic Surgery, Its Leadership, and the Importance of Intersectionality.学术外科的多元化、领导力及其交叉性的重要性。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Aug 1;156(8):748-756. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.1546.
10
Does gender influence leadership roles in academic surgery in the United States of America? A cross-sectional study.性别是否会影响美国学术外科领域的领导角色?一项横断面研究。
Int J Surg. 2020 Nov;83:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.08.029. Epub 2020 Aug 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Dismantle racism in science.消除科学中的种族主义。
Science. 2022 Mar 4;375(6584):937. doi: 10.1126/science.abo7849. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
2
Power and bullying in research.研究中的权力与霸凌行为
Lancet. 2022 Feb 19;399(10326):695. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02869-5.
3
Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions.学术界的性别偏见:一个需要解决的终身问题。
Neuron. 2021 Jul 7;109(13):2047-2074. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002.
4
Systemic racism in higher education.高等教育中的系统性种族主义。
Science. 2020 Sep 18;369(6510):1440-1441. doi: 10.1126/science.abd7140.
5
Racism in academia, and why the 'little things' matter.学术界的种族主义以及为何“小事”至关重要。
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7822):653-654. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-02471-6.
6
Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic groups in England are at increased risk of death from COVID-19: indirect standardisation of NHS mortality data.英格兰的黑人、亚裔和少数族裔群体死于新冠病毒的风险更高:英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)死亡率数据的间接标准化
Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Jun 24;5:88. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15922.2. eCollection 2020.
7
Time to look in the mirror.是时候照照镜子了。
Science. 2020 Jun 12;368(6496):1161. doi: 10.1126/science.abd1896. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
8
Stakeholder engagement in policy development: challenges and opportunities for human genomics.利益相关者参与政策制定:人类基因组学面临的挑战与机遇
Genet Med. 2015 Dec;17(12):949-57. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.8. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
9
Black women talk about workplace stress and how they cope.黑人女性谈论职场压力以及她们如何应对。
J Black Stud. 2012;43(2):207-26. doi: 10.1177/0021934711413272.
10
More women for higher education.更多女性接受高等教育。
Science. 1972 Nov 24;178(4063):815. doi: 10.1126/science.178.4063.815.