Suppr超能文献

来自七个在经济和文化上具有多样性的社会的儿童和青少年在有限的资源分配上对朋友和陌生人的差异。

Variations in limited resources allocation towards friends and strangers in children and adolescents from seven economically and culturally diverse societies.

机构信息

Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninskiy pr-t, 32a, Moscow, Russia, 199334.

National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 8;12(1):15232. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19354-7.

Abstract

Humans are unique among primates in altruism and sharing limited recourses towards non-kin. Our study revealed the differences in proportions of individuals ready to share limited resources with virtual friend compared to virtual stranger in children and adolescents from seven ethnic groups, represented by four traditional rural African societies from Tanzania with different types of economy and three societies from Russia. The study was conducted between 2015 and 2020, and the data on 2253 individuals (1104 males and 1149 females) were obtained. Six economic games with limited resource allocations were conducted: Prosocial, Envy, and Sharing games with imagined friends and stranger partners accordingly. All players were later classified according to their decisions in all six games into four behavioral types: egoistic, egalitarian, altruistic, and mixed. The effects of population origin, gender, age, and stranger/friend type of interaction on the behavior were estimated by multinomial logistic regression. It was demonstrated that more respondents prefer altruistic and egalitarian behavior than egoistic and mixed in the whole sample. However, significant parochial effect was found. The study revealed significant main effects of ethnicity, age, and the interaction effects of ethnicity and parochial tendencies, and ethnicity and age on the behavior of players.

摘要

人类在利他主义和与非亲属分享有限资源方面与灵长类动物不同。我们的研究揭示了在来自坦桑尼亚的四个具有不同经济类型的传统非洲社会以及三个俄罗斯社会的七个族群的儿童和青少年中,与虚拟朋友相比,个体愿意与虚拟陌生人分享有限资源的比例差异。这项研究于 2015 年至 2020 年进行,共获得了 2253 名个体(1104 名男性和 1149 名女性)的数据。进行了六项有限资源分配的经济游戏:亲社会、嫉妒和与想象中的朋友和陌生伙伴分享游戏。所有参与者根据他们在所有六个游戏中的决策被分为四种行为类型:利己主义、平等主义、利他主义和混合。通过多项逻辑回归估计了人口来源、性别、年龄以及陌生人/朋友类型的相互作用对行为的影响。结果表明,与利己主义和混合行为相比,更多的受访者更喜欢利他主义和平等主义行为。然而,发现了显著的地方偏见效应。研究还揭示了种族、年龄以及种族和地方倾向以及种族和年龄之间的相互作用对参与者行为的显著主要影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d18/9458677/a2f26a9cbd95/41598_2022_19354_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验