Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 8;22(1):1134. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08517-x.
Access to clinicians competent in transgender health remains a significant barrier and contributor toward health inequity for transgender people. Studies on access and barriers to care have predominantly evaluated transgender patients' perceptions, but scant research has included the perspectives of clinicians.
We conducted a qualitative study to explore how clinicians (meaning physicians and advanced practice providers, in this paper) in the United States: (1) attain and utilize information, (2) perceive barriers and facilitators, and (3) understood gaps in their professional training, in regard to practicing transgender health care.
A Qualitative Descriptive approach guided our conventional content analysis of field notes and interviews with clinicians within a parent study that explored health care access among transgender adults. Transcripts were coded into meaning units that were iteratively abstracted into themes. Standard measures were performed to promote the trustworthiness of the analysis and reduce bias.
Participants (n = 13) consisted of physicians (n = 8), physician assistants (n = 3), and nurse practitioners (n = 2). The majority were women (n = 11), identified as White (n = 9), cisgender (n = 13), and ages ranged from 31 - 58 years. Five main themes were identified: (1) Knowledge Acquisition: Formal and Informal Pathways to Competency; (2) Perceived Challenges and Barriers: I didn't know what I was doing; (3) Power to Deny: Prescriptive Authority and Gatekeeping; (4) Stigma: This is really strange, and I can't really understand it; (5) Reflections: Strategies for Success, Rewards, and Personal Motivations.
Clinicians gained a sense of comfort and competence with mentorship, self-directed learning, clinical experience, and person-centered, harm-reduction approaches. Stigma, bias, and structural-level factors were barriers to providing care. This study offers a unique perspective of clinicians' motivations and strategies for providing gender-affirming care and elucidates how stigma impacts the delivery of gender-affirming care.
获得精通 transgender 健康的临床医生仍然是 transgender 人群健康不平等的一个重大障碍和促成因素。关于获得和获得护理的障碍的研究主要评估了 transgender 患者的看法,但几乎没有研究包括临床医生的观点。
我们进行了一项定性研究,以探讨美国的临床医生(在本文中是指医生和高级实践提供者):(1)获得和利用信息;(2)感知障碍和促进因素;(3)了解他们在 transgender 医疗保健方面的专业培训差距。
在一项探索 transgender 成年人获得医疗保健机会的母研究中,我们采用定性描述方法指导对临床医生的现场笔记和访谈进行常规内容分析。将转录本编码为有意义的单位,然后迭代抽象为主题。采用标准措施提高分析的可信度并减少偏见。
参与者(n=13)由医生(n=8)、医生助理(n=3)和执业护士(n=2)组成。大多数是女性(n=11),被认定为白人(n=9)、顺性别者(n=13),年龄在 31 岁至 58 岁之间。确定了五个主要主题:(1)知识获取:胜任的正式和非正式途径;(2)感知到的挑战和障碍:我不知道自己在做什么;(3)拒绝的权力:规定性权威和把关;(4)污名:这真的很奇怪,我真的无法理解;(5)反思:成功、奖励和个人动机的策略。
临床医生通过指导、自我指导学习、临床经验以及以患者为中心、减少伤害的方法获得了舒适感和能力。污名、偏见和结构性因素是提供护理的障碍。这项研究提供了临床医生提供性别肯定护理的动机和策略的独特视角,并阐明了污名如何影响性别肯定护理的提供。