Suppr超能文献

确定DNA损伤反应(DDR)抑制剂在宫颈癌治疗中的潜力。

Determining the Potential of DNA Damage Response (DDR) Inhibitors in Cervical Cancer Therapy.

作者信息

Saha Santu, Rundle Stuart, Kotsopoulos Ioannis C, Begbie Jacob, Howarth Rachel, Pappworth Isabel Y, Mukhopadhyay Asima, Kucukmetin Ali, Marchbank Kevin J, Curtin Nicola

机构信息

Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.

The Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre (NGOC), Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Gateshead NE9 6SX, UK.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 1;14(17):4288. doi: 10.3390/cancers14174288.

Abstract

Cisplatin-based chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for advanced cervical cancer (CC) but the response rate is poor (46-72%) and cisplatin is nephrotoxic. Therefore, better treatment of CC is urgently needed. We have directly compared, for the first time, the cytotoxicity of four DDR inhibitors (rucaparib/PARPi, VE-821/ATRi, PF-477736/CHK1i and MK-1775/WEE1i) as single agents, and in combination with cisplatin and radiotherapy (RT) in a panel of CC cells. All inhibitors alone caused concentration-dependent cytotoxicity. Low ATM and DNA-PKcs levels were associated with greater VE-821 cytotoxicity. Cisplatin induced ATR, CHK1 and WEE1 activity in all of the cell lines. Cisplatin only activated PARP in S-phase cells, but RT activated PARP in the entire population. Rucaparib was the most potent radiosensitiser and VE-821 was the most potent chemosensitiser. VE-821, PF-47736 and MK-1775 attenuated cisplatin-induced S-phase arrest but tended to increase G2 phase accumulation. In mice, cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury was associated with oxidative stress and PARP activation and was prevented by rucaparib. Therefore, while all inhibitors investigated may increase the efficacy of CRT, the greatest clinical potential of rucaparib may be in limiting kidney damage, which is dose-limiting.

摘要

基于顺铂的放化疗(CRT)是晚期宫颈癌(CC)的标准治疗方法,但缓解率较低(46-72%),且顺铂具有肾毒性。因此,迫切需要更好的CC治疗方法。我们首次直接比较了四种DNA损伤修复(DDR)抑制剂(鲁卡帕尼/聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶抑制剂(PARPi)、VE-821/共济失调毛细血管扩张症和Rad3相关蛋白激酶抑制剂(ATRi)、PF-477736/细胞周期检查点激酶1抑制剂(CHK1i)和MK-1775/wee1样蛋白激酶抑制剂(WEE1i))作为单一药物以及与顺铂和放疗(RT)联合使用时在一组CC细胞中的细胞毒性。所有抑制剂单独使用时均引起浓度依赖性细胞毒性。低水平的共济失调毛细血管扩张症突变基因(ATM)和DNA依赖蛋白激酶催化亚基(DNA-PKcs)与更高的VE-821细胞毒性相关。顺铂在所有细胞系中诱导共济失调毛细血管扩张症和Rad3相关蛋白(ATR)、细胞周期检查点激酶1(CHK1)和wee1样蛋白激酶(WEE1)的活性。顺铂仅在S期细胞中激活聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶(PARP),但放疗在整个细胞群体中激活PARP。鲁卡帕尼是最有效的放射增敏剂,VE-821是最有效的化学增敏剂。VE-821、PF-47736和MK-1775减轻了顺铂诱导的S期阻滞,但倾向于增加G2期积累。在小鼠中,顺铂诱导的急性肾损伤与氧化应激和PARP激活相关,而鲁卡帕尼可预防这种损伤。因此,虽然所有研究的抑制剂都可能提高CRT的疗效,但鲁卡帕尼最大的临床潜力可能在于限制肾损伤,而肾损伤是剂量限制性的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9a8/9454916/46ea9d74c2ce/cancers-14-04288-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验