Vicent Jorge, Verrelst Jochem, Rivera-Caicedo Juan Pablo, Sabater Neus, Muñoz-Marí Jordi, Camps-Valls Gustau, Moreno José
Image Processing Laboratory, University of Valencia, Valencia 46980, Spain.
CONACYT-UAN, Departamento: Secretaria de investigatión y posgrado, 63155, Tepic, Mexico.
IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens. 2018 Oct 26;11(12):4918-4931. doi: 10.1109/jstars.2018.2875330.
Computationally expensive radiative transfer models (RTMs) are widely used to realistically reproduce the light interaction with the earth surface and atmosphere. Because these models take long processing time, the common practice is to first generate a sparse look-up table (LUT) and then make use of interpolation methods to sample the multidimensional LUT input variable space. However, the question arise whether common interpolation methodsperform most accurate. As an alternative to interpolation, this paper proposes to use emulation, i.e., approximating the RTM output by means of the statistical learning. Two experiments were conducted to assess the accuracy in delivering spectral outputs using interpolation and emulation: at canopy level, using PROSAIL; and at top-of-atmosphere level, using MODTRAN. Various interpolation (nearest-neighbor, inverse distance weighting, and piece-wice linear) and emulation [Gaussian process regression (GPR), kernel ridge regression, and neural networks] methods were evaluated against a dense reference LUT. In all experiments, the emulation methods clearly produced more accurate output spectra than classical interpolation methods. The GPR emulation performed up to ten times more accurately than the best performing interpolation method, and this with a speed that is competitive with the faster interpolation methods. It is concluded that emulation can function as a fast and more accurate alternative to commonly used interpolation methods for reconstructing RTM spectral data.
计算成本高昂的辐射传输模型(RTMs)被广泛用于逼真地再现光与地球表面和大气的相互作用。由于这些模型处理时间长,常见做法是先生成一个稀疏查找表(LUT),然后利用插值方法对多维LUT输入变量空间进行采样。然而,常见的插值方法是否最为精确这一问题随之而来。作为插值的替代方法,本文提议使用仿真,即通过统计学习来逼近RTM输出。进行了两项实验,以评估使用插值和仿真来提供光谱输出的准确性:在冠层水平,使用PROSAIL模型;在大气顶层水平,使用MODTRAN模型。针对一个密集的参考LUT,评估了各种插值(最近邻、反距离加权和分段线性)和仿真[高斯过程回归(GPR)、核岭回归和神经网络]方法。在所有实验中,仿真方法明显比传统插值方法产生更准确的输出光谱。GPR仿真的表现比性能最佳的插值方法精确高达十倍,而且其速度与较快的插值方法相当。得出的结论是,对于重建RTM光谱数据,仿真可以作为一种快速且更精确的替代常用插值方法的手段。