Suppr超能文献

一种用于主要腹部癌症手术患者的基于可穿戴贴片的远程早期预警评分(REWS)。

A wearable patch based remote early warning score (REWS) in major abdominal cancer surgery patients.

作者信息

van der Stam Jonna A, Mestrom Eveline H J, Nienhuijs Simon W, de Hingh Ignace H J T, Boer Arjen-Kars, van Riel Natal A W, de Groot Koen T J, Verhaegh Wim, Scharnhorst Volkher, Bouwman R Arthur

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Clinical Laboratory, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Expert Center Clinical Chemistry Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care & Pain Medicine, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jan;49(1):278-284. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.08.034. Epub 2022 Sep 2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The shift toward remote patient monitoring methods to detect clinical deterioration requires testing of wearable devices in real-life clinical settings. This study aimed to develop a remote early warning scoring (REWS) system based on continuous measurements using a wearable device, and compare its diagnostic performance for the detection of deterioration to the diagnostic performance of the conventional modified early warning score (MEWS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study population of this prospective, single center trial consisted of patients who underwent major abdominal cancer surgery and were monitored using routine in-hospital spotcheck measurements of the vital parameters. Heart and respiratory rates were measured continuously using a wireless accelerometer patch (HealthDot). The prediction by MEWS of deterioration toward a complication graded Clavien-Dindo of 2 or higher was compared to the REWS derived from continuous measurements by the wearable patch.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 103 patients and 1909 spot-check measurements were included in the analysis. Postoperative deterioration was observed in 29 patients. For both EWS systems, the sensitivity (MEWS: 0.20 95% CI: [0.13-0.29], REWS: 0.20 95% CI: [0.13-0.29]) and specificity (MEWS: 0.96 95% CI: [0.95-0.97], REWS: 0.96 95% CI: [0.95-0.97]) were assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic value of the REWS method, based on continuous measurements of the heart and respiratory rates, is comparable to that of the MEWS in patients following major abdominal cancer surgery. The wearable patch could detect the same amount of deteriorations, without requiring manual spot check measurements.

摘要

引言

向用于检测临床病情恶化的远程患者监测方法的转变需要在现实临床环境中对可穿戴设备进行测试。本研究旨在基于使用可穿戴设备的连续测量开发一种远程预警评分(REWS)系统,并将其对病情恶化的诊断性能与传统改良预警评分(MEWS)的诊断性能进行比较。

材料与方法

这项前瞻性单中心试验的研究人群包括接受腹部大手术的患者,这些患者通过常规的院内生命体征参数抽查测量进行监测。使用无线加速度计贴片(HealthDot)连续测量心率和呼吸频率。将MEWS对Clavien-Dindo分级为2级或更高的并发症恶化的预测与可穿戴贴片连续测量得出的REWS进行比较。

主要结果

分析共纳入103例患者和1909次抽查测量。观察到29例患者术后病情恶化。对于这两种预警评分系统,均评估了敏感性(MEWS:0.20 95%CI:[0.13 - 0.29],REWS:0.20 95%CI:[0.13 - 0.29])和特异性(MEWS:0.96 95%CI:[0.95 - 0.97],REWS:0.96 95%CI:[0.95 - 0.97])。

结论

基于心率和呼吸频率连续测量的REWS方法在腹部大手术后患者中的诊断价值与MEWS相当。可穿戴贴片能够检测到相同数量的病情恶化情况,而无需人工进行抽查测量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验