Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Autoimmun Rev. 2022 Nov;21(11):103188. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2022.103188. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
Despite an unprecedented rise in the number of biological therapies developed for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) during the last decades, most randomised clinical trials (RCTs) have failed to reach their primary efficacy endpoint. These endpoints mainly constitute composite outcomes that encompass disease activity indices derived from clinician-reported and laboratory data and do not necessarily reflect the patient perspective, as symptoms that represent major concerns to patients, such as fatigue, are seldom part of the evaluation. To overcome this limitation, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) constitute useful tools for evaluating the effect of an intervention on facets that are particularly relevant for the patients. In the present review, we performed a systematic literature search aiming to examine the effect of biological therapies on SLE patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and fatigue in RCT and real-life settings. We summarised results concerning 14 different biological agents, the majority of which targeting B cells or type I interferons, and discuss strategies that have been used to analyse HRQoL data, putting emphasis on minimal clinically important differences and the potential use of PROs as distinct targets in treat-to-target approaches. Lastly, we discuss differences between generic and disease-specific PRO measures and highlight the need of using a combination thereof aiming to capture the patient perspective in a comprehensive manner.
尽管过去几十年中针对系统性红斑狼疮 (SLE) 开发了数量空前的生物疗法,但大多数随机临床试验 (RCT) 都未能达到其主要疗效终点。这些终点主要由综合结果组成,包括来自临床医生报告和实验室数据的疾病活动指数,不一定反映患者的观点,因为代表患者主要关注点的症状(如疲劳)很少纳入评估。为了克服这一局限性,患者报告的结局 (PROs) 是评估干预措施对患者特别相关方面影响的有用工具。在本综述中,我们进行了系统的文献检索,旨在检查生物疗法对 RCT 和真实环境中 SLE 患者健康相关生活质量 (HRQoL) 和疲劳的影响。我们总结了涉及 14 种不同生物制剂的结果,其中大多数针对 B 细胞或 I 型干扰素,并讨论了用于分析 HRQoL 数据的策略,重点是最小临床重要差异和 PRO 作为治疗目标的潜在用途。最后,我们讨论了通用和疾病特异性 PRO 测量之间的差异,并强调需要结合使用它们,以全面捕捉患者的观点。