Xu Zhuo, Wang Zhilin, Zhong Bo, Wang Minjiao, Fan Xiaoqin, Ren Cuncun, Qi Meihao, Lin Ying, Zha Dingjun
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Division of Mechanics and Acoustics, National Institute of Metrology, Beijing, China.
Front Neurol. 2022 Aug 25;13:956996. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.956996. eCollection 2022.
Aging is a process associated with degeneration and dysfunction of peripheral vestibular system or apparatus. This study aimed to investigate the influence of aging on ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) response rates and recording parameters using the B81 bone vibrator and compare them with air conduction stimuli (ACS) oVEMP response characteristics.
In 60 healthy participants aged 10-71 years (mean age 39.9; 29 male participants), the oVEMP response was elicited using a B81 bone vibrator and an ER-3A insert earphone. The effects of age and stimulus on oVEMP response rates and recording parameters were evaluated.
Response rates and amplitudes declined with aging using either ACS or bone-conducted vibration (BCV) stimulation, particularly in individuals over 60 years of age, whereas thresholds increased and N1 latencies were prolonged. BCV showed fewer risks of absent oVEMP response than ACS ( = 0.002). BCV acquired higher amplitudes ( < 0.001), lower thresholds, and shorter N1 and P1 latencies (all < 0.001) than ACS.
The absence of an oVEMP response may be attributed to aging rather than a concurrent vestibular disorder. B81-BCV likely produces higher mechanical drives to the vestibular hair cells at safer and non-traumatic levels compared with ACS and therefore may be more likely to evoke a response in the elderly cohort, whose vestibular function and mechanical sensitivity have declined. Thus, B81-BCV stimulation is more effective and safer to elicit oVEMPs, and it should be recommended when ACS fails in the clinic, particularly in the elderly population.
衰老过程与外周前庭系统或器官的退化及功能障碍相关。本研究旨在探讨衰老对使用B81骨振动器的眼前庭诱发肌源性电位(oVEMP)反应率及记录参数的影响,并将其与气导刺激(ACS)oVEMP反应特征进行比较。
对60名年龄在10 - 71岁(平均年龄39.9岁;29名男性参与者)的健康受试者,使用B81骨振动器和ER - 3A插入式耳机诱发oVEMP反应。评估年龄和刺激对oVEMP反应率及记录参数的影响。
使用ACS或骨传导振动(BCV)刺激时,反应率和波幅均随衰老而下降,尤其在60岁以上个体中,而阈值升高,N1潜伏期延长。与ACS相比,BCV诱发oVEMP反应缺失的风险更低(P = 0.002)。与ACS相比,BCV获得更高的波幅(P < 0.001)、更低的阈值以及更短的N1和P1潜伏期(均P < 0.001)。
oVEMP反应缺失可能归因于衰老而非并发的前庭疾病。与ACS相比,B81 - BCV可能在更安全且无创的水平上对前庭毛细胞产生更高的机械驱动,因此更有可能在老年人群中诱发反应,因为他们的前庭功能和机械敏感性已经下降。因此,B81 - BCV刺激诱发oVEMP更有效且更安全,当临床中ACS未能引出反应时,尤其在老年人群中,应推荐使用B81 - BCV刺激。