• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于微创外科影像技术的肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石的临床价值分析

Clinical Value Analysis of Hepatectomy Based on Minimally Invasive Surgical Imaging for Hepatolithiasis.

作者信息

Zhang Shubin, Xing Zhongqiang, Zhou Xinbo, Hu Zixuan, Liu Jianhua

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiangzhuang 050000, Hebei, China.

出版信息

Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Aug 31;2022:3306771. doi: 10.1155/2022/3306771. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/3306771
PMID:36091583
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9451971/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical value of hepatectomy based on minimally invasive surgical images in the treatment of hepatolithiasis.

METHODS

The clinical data of 87 patients with hepatolithiasis who received treatment in the Department of General Surgery of our hospital from February 2020 to September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different surgical methods, the patients were divided into minimally invasive group ( = 43) and laparotomy group ( = 44). Perioperative conditions and stone clearance rate were compared.

RESULTS

The preoperative conditions of patients in the two groups were comparable, and the average operation time in the minimally invasive group was significantly longer than that in the laparotomy group ( = 18.783, < 0.001). There was no significant difference in intraoperative bleeding, postoperative fasting time, postoperative complications, and stone clearance between the two groups ( > 0.05). Postoperative hospital stay was significantly lower in the minimally invasive group than that in the laparotomy group ( = -0.486, < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Hepatectomy based on minimally invasive surgical imaging for hepatolithiasis is safe and feasible, has high clinical value, and can achieve similar short-term clinical efficacy to laparotomy and reduce the postoperative hospital stay of patients, reflecting its minimally invasive advantages, and it is worthy of clinical application.

摘要

目的

探讨基于微创外科影像的肝切除术在肝内胆管结石治疗中的临床价值。

方法

回顾性分析2020年2月至2021年9月在我院普通外科接受治疗的87例肝内胆管结石患者的临床资料。根据手术方式不同,将患者分为微创组(n = 43)和开腹组(n = 44)。比较两组围手术期情况及结石清除率。

结果

两组患者术前情况具有可比性,微创组平均手术时间显著长于开腹组(t = 18.783,P < 0.001)。两组术中出血量、术后禁食时间、术后并发症及结石清除情况比较,差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。微创组术后住院时间显著短于开腹组(t = -0.486,P < 0.001)。

结论

基于微创外科影像的肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石安全可行,具有较高的临床价值,可获得与开腹手术相似的短期临床疗效,减少患者术后住院时间,体现了其微创优势,值得临床应用。

相似文献

1
Clinical Value Analysis of Hepatectomy Based on Minimally Invasive Surgical Imaging for Hepatolithiasis.基于微创外科影像技术的肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石的临床价值分析
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Aug 31;2022:3306771. doi: 10.1155/2022/3306771. eCollection 2022.
2
Minimally invasive surgery versus open hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: A systematic review and meta analysis.微创外科与开腹肝切除术治疗肝胆管结石病的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Mar;51:191-198. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.038. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
3
Preliminary Exploration on the Efficacy of Augmented Reality-Guided Hepatectomy for Hepatolithiasis.增强现实引导肝切除术治疗肝胆管结石的初步探索
J Am Coll Surg. 2022 Oct 1;235(4):677-688. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000285. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
4
Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: a feasibility and safety study in 29 patients.腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石:29例患者的可行性与安全性研究
Surg Endosc. 2007 Jul;21(7):1074-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9306-9. Epub 2007 May 22.
5
[Safety and efficacy evaluation of laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: a propensity score matched analysis].[腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石的安全性和疗效评估:倾向评分匹配分析]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 1;60(6):593-598. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20211212-00594.
6
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for complex hepatolithiasis: a propensity score matching analysis.机器人辅助腹腔镜手术治疗复杂肝内胆管结石:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2539-2547. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6547-8. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
7
Reoperation for recurrent hepatolithiasis: laparotomy versus laparoscopy.复发性肝内胆管结石的再次手术:开腹手术与腹腔镜手术对比
Surg Endosc. 2017 Aug;31(8):3098-3105. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5631-9. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
8
[Open hepatectomy versus laparoscopic in the treatment of primary left-sided hepatolithiasis: a propensity, long-term follow-up analysis at a single center].[开放肝切除术与腹腔镜手术治疗原发性左侧肝内胆管结石:单中心倾向评分长期随访分析]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jul 1;58(7):530-538. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20191114-00561.
9
Laparoscopic left-sided hepatectomy for the treatment of hepatolithiasis: A comparative study with open approach.腹腔镜左半肝切除术治疗肝胆管结石:与开放手术的对比研究。
Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.068. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
10
Laparoscopic vs open left hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis.腹腔镜与开腹左半肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石的比较。
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jun 14;16(22):2818-23. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i22.2818.

本文引用的文献

1
Resection of extrahepatic bile ducts with partial hepatectomy for treating intra- and extrahepatic hepatolithiasis.肝外胆管切除联合部分肝切除术治疗肝内外胆管结石。
BMC Surg. 2021 Dec 15;21(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01419-5.
2
Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Left Lateral Hepatectomy and Open Left Lateral Hepatectomy for Hepatolithiasis: A Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜左外叶肝切除术与开腹左外叶肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石的安全性和有效性比较:一项Meta分析
Front Surg. 2021 Nov 16;8:749285. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.749285. eCollection 2021.
3
Application of Laparoscopic Technique in the Treatment of Hepatolithiasis.腹腔镜技术在肝内胆管结石治疗中的应用。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Nov 25;31(2):247-253. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000871.
4
Management of Hepatolithiasis: Review of the Literature.肝内胆管结石的治疗:文献综述
Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2020 May 7;22(6):30. doi: 10.1007/s11894-020-00765-3.
5
Total laparoscopic partial hepatectomy versus open partial hepatectomy for primary left-sided hepatolithiasis: A propensity, long-term follow-up analysis at a single center.腹腔镜与开腹左半肝切除术治疗原发性左肝内胆管结石的对比:单中心倾向性长期随访分析。
Surgery. 2018 Apr;163(4):714-720. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.10.053. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
6
Laparoscopic open hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov 21;23(43):7791-7806. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i43.7791.
7
Laparoscopic left-sided hepatectomy for the treatment of hepatolithiasis: A comparative study with open approach.腹腔镜左半肝切除术治疗肝胆管结石:与开放手术的对比研究。
Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.068. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
8
Laparoscopic Versus Open Left-Sided Hepatectomy for Hepatolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜与开放左半肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Sep;27(9):951-958. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0357. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
9
Laparoscopic versus open left hemihepatectomy for hepatolithiasis.腹腔镜与开放左半肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石
J Surg Res. 2015 Dec;199(2):402-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.06.021. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
10
Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: a feasibility and safety study in 29 patients.腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石:29例患者的可行性与安全性研究
Surg Endosc. 2007 Jul;21(7):1074-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9306-9. Epub 2007 May 22.