• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜左外叶肝切除术与开腹左外叶肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石的安全性和有效性比较:一项Meta分析

Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Left Lateral Hepatectomy and Open Left Lateral Hepatectomy for Hepatolithiasis: A Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Wang Xiaoji, Chen Ai, Fu Qiurong, Cai Chunping

机构信息

Department of Liver and Gallbladder Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.

Department of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2021 Nov 16;8:749285. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.749285. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2021.749285
PMID:34869557
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8635008/
Abstract

Intrahepatic duct (IHD) stones, also known as hepatolithiasis, refers to any intrahepatic stones of the left and right hepatic ducts. It is a benign biliary tract disease with a high recurrence rate, with many complications, and difficulty in radical cure. The aim of this review and meta-analysis is to compare the safety and efficacy of the laparoscopic left lateral hepatectomy (LLLH) and open left lateral hepatectomy (OLLH) for IHD stones. Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, WangFang Data, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the comparison of LLLH and OLLH in the treatment of hepatolithiasis. Standard mean difference (SMD), odds ratio (OR), and 95% CI were calculated using the random-effects model or fixed-effects model according to the heterogeneity between studies. From January 01, 2001 to May 30, 2021, 1,056 articles were retrieved, but only 13 articles were finally included for the meta-analysis. The results showed that compared to the OLLH group, LLLH resulted in smaller surgical incision, less intraoperative blood loss, faster postoperative recovery, and fewer postoperative complications (surgical incision: SMD = -3.76, 95% CI: -5.40, -2.12; intraoperative blood loss: SMD = -0.95, 95% CI: -1.69, -0.21; length of hospital stay: SMD = -1.56, 95% CI: -2.37, -0.75; postoperative complications: OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.26, 0.78). In the treatment of hepatolithiasis, compared with OLLH, LLLH has the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss, smaller incisions, less postoperative complications, shorter hospital stay, shorter time to first postoperative exhaust, and postoperative ambulation, and rapid postoperative recovery.

摘要

肝内胆管(IHD)结石,又称肝内胆管结石,是指左右肝管内的任何肝内结石。它是一种良性胆道疾病,复发率高,并发症多,根治困难。本综述和荟萃分析的目的是比较腹腔镜左外叶肝切除术(LLLH)和开腹左外叶肝切除术(OLLH)治疗IHD结石的安全性和有效性。检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane、万方数据和中国知网,以查找关于LLLH和OLLH治疗肝内胆管结石比较的随机对照试验(RCT)。根据研究间的异质性,使用随机效应模型或固定效应模型计算标准化均数差(SMD)、比值比(OR)和95%可信区间(CI)。2001年1月1日至2021年5月30日,共检索到1056篇文章,但最终仅纳入13篇文章进行荟萃分析。结果显示,与OLLH组相比,LLLH手术切口更小、术中出血量更少、术后恢复更快、术后并发症更少(手术切口:SMD = -3.76,95%CI:-5.40,-2.12;术中出血量:SMD = -0.95,95%CI:-1.69,-0.21;住院时间:SMD = -1.56,95%CI:-2.37,-0.75;术后并发症:OR = 0.45,95%CI:0.26,0.78)。在肝内胆管结石的治疗中,与OLLH相比,LLLH具有术中出血量少、切口小、术后并发症少、住院时间短、首次排气时间短、术后下床活动早以及术后恢复快等优点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f696/8635008/bdc6c1321fc5/fsurg-08-749285-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f696/8635008/3a6d4d7a1400/fsurg-08-749285-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f696/8635008/c15fd9fee808/fsurg-08-749285-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f696/8635008/3af838ae472c/fsurg-08-749285-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f696/8635008/bdc6c1321fc5/fsurg-08-749285-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f696/8635008/3a6d4d7a1400/fsurg-08-749285-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f696/8635008/c15fd9fee808/fsurg-08-749285-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f696/8635008/3af838ae472c/fsurg-08-749285-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f696/8635008/bdc6c1321fc5/fsurg-08-749285-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Left Lateral Hepatectomy and Open Left Lateral Hepatectomy for Hepatolithiasis: A Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜左外叶肝切除术与开腹左外叶肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石的安全性和有效性比较:一项Meta分析
Front Surg. 2021 Nov 16;8:749285. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.749285. eCollection 2021.
2
Laparoscopic hepatectomy produces better outcomes for hepatolithiasis than open hepatectomy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜肝切除术治疗肝胆管结石症的效果优于开腹肝切除术:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Mar;51:151-163. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
3
Laparoscopic open hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov 21;23(43):7791-7806. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i43.7791.
4
Laparoscopic left-sided hepatectomy for the treatment of hepatolithiasis: A comparative study with open approach.腹腔镜左半肝切除术治疗肝胆管结石:与开放手术的对比研究。
Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:117-123. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.068. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
5
Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for giant hepatic cysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹肝切除术治疗巨大肝囊肿的安全性和有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Transl Cancer Res. 2022 May;11(5):1230-1244. doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-910.
6
[Open hepatectomy versus laparoscopic in the treatment of primary left-sided hepatolithiasis: a propensity, long-term follow-up analysis at a single center].[开放肝切除术与腹腔镜手术治疗原发性左侧肝内胆管结石:单中心倾向评分长期随访分析]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jul 1;58(7):530-538. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20191114-00561.
7
Minimally invasive surgery versus open hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: A systematic review and meta analysis.微创外科与开腹肝切除术治疗肝胆管结石病的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Mar;51:191-198. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.038. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
8
Comparison of laparoscopic versus open left-sided hepatectomy for intrahepatic duct stones.腹腔镜与开腹左半肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石的比较
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):259-65. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4200-3. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
9
Laparoscopic Versus Open Left-Sided Hepatectomy for Hepatolithiasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜与开放左半肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Sep;27(9):951-958. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0357. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
10
[Safety and efficacy evaluation of laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: a propensity score matched analysis].[腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石的安全性和疗效评估:倾向评分匹配分析]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 1;60(6):593-598. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20211212-00594.

引用本文的文献

1
Thulium laser-assisted laparoscopic management of intrahepatic stones in recurrent pyogenic cholangitis: A case report and review of minimally invasive approaches.铥激光辅助腹腔镜治疗复发性化脓性胆管炎肝内结石:一例报告及微创治疗方法综述
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2025 Mar;128:111005. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.111005. Epub 2025 Feb 2.
2
Development of a novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection procedure in patients with intrahepatic duct stones.肝内胆管结石患者腹腔镜肝切除手术新型难度评分系统的开发
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Oct 27;16(10):3133-3141. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3133.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Novel Approaches in Pilonidal Sinus Treatment.藏毛窦治疗的新方法。
Prague Med Rep. 2016;117(4):145-152. doi: 10.14712/23362936.2016.15.
2
Surgical outcomes following laparoscopic major hepatectomy for various liver diseases.各种肝脏疾病行腹腔镜下大肝切除术后的手术结果。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Oct;95(43):e5182. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005182.
3
Comparative Short-term Benefits of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: 9000 Cases and Climbing.腹腔镜肝切除术的短期比较效益:9000例且仍在增加。
Hepatolithiasis: Epidemiology, presentation, classification and management of a complex disease.
肝内胆管结石:一种复杂疾病的流行病学、临床表现、分类及管理
World J Gastroenterol. 2024 Apr 7;30(13):1836-1850. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i13.1836.
4
Clinical Value Analysis of Hepatectomy Based on Minimally Invasive Surgical Imaging for Hepatolithiasis.基于微创外科影像技术的肝切除术治疗肝内胆管结石的临床价值分析
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Aug 31;2022:3306771. doi: 10.1155/2022/3306771. eCollection 2022.
Ann Surg. 2016 Apr;263(4):761-77. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001413.
4
Laparoscopic hepatectomy by curettage and aspiration: a report of 855 cases.刮除抽吸式腹腔镜肝切除术:855例报告
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):2904-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4576-0. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
5
Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data.MetaProp:用于对二项数据进行荟萃分析的 Stata 命令。
Arch Public Health. 2014 Nov 10;72(1):39. doi: 10.1186/2049-3258-72-39. eCollection 2014.
6
Pure Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection in Treatment of Hepatolithiasis Within the Left Lobes: A Randomized Trial Study.纯腹腔镜与开放肝切除术治疗左叶肝内胆管结石的随机对照试验研究
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Oct;25(5):392-4. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000120.
7
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
8
Endoscopic or laparoscopic approach for hepatolithiasis in the era of endoscopy in China.中国内镜时代肝内胆管结石的内镜或腹腔镜治疗方法
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jan;29(1):154-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3669-5. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
9
Comparison of laparoscopic versus open left hemihepatectomy for left-sided hepatolithiasis.腹腔镜与开腹左半肝切除术治疗左侧肝内胆管结石的比较。
Int J Med Sci. 2014 Jan 2;11(2):127-33. doi: 10.7150/ijms.7516. eCollection 2014.
10
Surgical management of recurrent pyogenic cholangitis: 10 years of experience in a tertiary referral centre in Hong Kong.复发性化脓性胆管炎的外科治疗:香港一家三级转诊中心的10年经验
HPB (Oxford). 2014 Aug;16(8):776-80. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12185. Epub 2013 Nov 7.