Cogan Elie
Department of Internal Medicine, CHIREC Hospitals and Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 24;9:932138. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.932138. eCollection 2022.
Scientific fraud represents, to varying degrees, an increasingly important part of medical literature and is estimated to make up nearly 20% of this literature. The increase in the number of articles accessible in preprint without peer review during the COVID-19 pandemic has led to an increase in the accessibility of fraudulent articles. In recent years, the viral increase in the number of predatory journals has contributed to polluting the scientific literature with articles whose content is unverifiable. Given the international nature of biomedical research, there is an urgent need to define unequivocally what is considered scientific fraud. In order to counter scientific misconduct, national and supranational procedures should be implemented to inform researchers at the beginning of their medical and biomedical training. Ethics commissions should implement local procedures for monitoring ongoing research. Finally, the fight against predatory journals requires information for researchers and the availability of tools to identify these journals.
科学欺诈在不同程度上已成为医学文献中日益重要的一部分,据估计占该文献的近20%。在新冠疫情期间,未经同行评审的预印本文章数量增加,导致欺诈性文章的可获取性增加。近年来,掠夺性期刊数量的激增致使科学文献被内容无法核实的文章所污染。鉴于生物医学研究的国际性,迫切需要明确界定何为科学欺诈。为了打击科学不端行为,应实施国家和超国家程序,以便在医学和生物医学研究人员培训之初就向他们提供相关信息。伦理委员会应实施本地程序以监测正在进行的研究。最后,打击掠夺性期刊需要为研究人员提供信息以及提供识别这些期刊的工具。